1-13 of 13
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine (2021)
Published: 05 April 2021
Journal Articles
Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine (2020) 1 (1): 9–14.
Published: 14 December 2020
Images
Comparing fluoroscopy time in minutes between pedal (EC) and no pedal (TC)....
Published: 14 December 2020
Figure 1 Comparing fluoroscopy time in minutes between pedal (EC) and no pedal (TC). The mean for pedal-use group was 2.4 minutes (95% CI 2.11–2.69), and for no-pedal group was 1.835 minutes (95% CI 1.6–2.07). This figure compares EC (187 ERCP) versus TC (250 ERCP). The results show a statisticall... More
Images
Comparing DAP in Gy·cm 2  between pedal (EC) versus no pedal (TC). The mean...
Published: 14 December 2020
Figure 2 Comparing DAP in Gy·cm 2 between pedal (EC) versus no pedal (TC). The mean for the pedal-use group was DAP of 17,641.618 Gy·cm 2 (95% CI 14,900–20,300), and for no-pedal group was DAP of 13,414.262 Gy·cm 2 (95% CI 11,600–15,300). This figure compares EC (187 ERCP) versus TC (250 ERCP).... More
Images
Comparing fluoroscopy time between degrees of difficulty. Degree 1 (in blue...
Published: 14 December 2020
Figure 3 Comparing fluoroscopy time between degrees of difficulty. Degree 1 (in blue) mean was 1.581 minutes (95% CI 1.27–1.9), degree 2 (in yellow) mean was 1.646 minutes (95% CI 1.44–1.86), degree 3 (in gray) mean was 2.46 minutes (95% CI 2.09–2.83), degree 4 (in red) mean was 4.021 minutes (95%... More
Images
Comparing DAP Gy·cm 2  between degrees of difficulty. Degree 1 (in blue) me...
Published: 14 December 2020
Figure 4 Comparing DAP Gy·cm 2 between degrees of difficulty. Degree 1 (in blue) mean was 12,716.656 Gy·cm 2 (95% CI 9760–15,700), degree 2 (in yellow) mean was 11,426.192 Gy·cm 2 (95% CI 10,000–12,800), degree 3 (in gray) mean was 16,641.576 Gy·cm 2 (95% CI 13,600–19,700), degree 4 (in red) m... More
Journal Articles
Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine (2020) 1 (1): 3–8.
Published: 21 October 2020
Journal Articles
Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine (2020) 1 (1): 15–19.
Published: 21 October 2020
Images
Images from digital subtraction angiography (A) and cone beam computed tomo...
Published: 21 October 2020
Figure 1 Images from digital subtraction angiography (A) and cone beam computed tomography (B) performed in the interventional radiology suite after an endobronchial blocker was placed at bedside under mobile fluoroscopic system guidance. More
Images
Angiogram demonstrating (A) pulmonary artery rupture. (B) Placement of an e...
Published: 21 October 2020
Figure 2 Angiogram demonstrating (A) pulmonary artery rupture. (B) Placement of an endobronchial blocker, which achieved hemostasis and allowed the embolization to be completed. More
Images
Cone beam computed tomography images obtained before (A) and after (B) a di...
Published: 21 October 2020
Figure 3 Cone beam computed tomography images obtained before (A) and after (B) a dislodged endobronchial blocker was repositioned from the trachea to the right main stem bronchus. More
Images
Cone beam computed tomography images of endobronchial blockers placed in th...
Published: 21 October 2020
Figure 4 Cone beam computed tomography images of endobronchial blockers placed in the trachea and right main stem bronchus under fluoroscopic guidance. More
Journal Articles