Duplicate Appendix With Acute Ruptured Appendicitis: A Case Report

A 33-year-old African-American female presented to the Emergency Department with migratory right lower quadrant pain of 4 days duration associated with nausea and vomiting. Clinical evaluation showed that she was febrile and had a tender right lower quadrant with rebound tenderness and guarding. Her white blood cell count was elevated with neutrophilia. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed possible acute appendicitis with perforation and purulent fluid collection in the pelvis. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed 2 appendices attached via separate bases to 1 cecum. The anterior appendix was inflamed with a gangrenous tip while the posterior appendix was grossly normal (Fig. 1). Both appendices were located on the taenia-coli. No other intra-abdominal anomalies were discovered. Subsequently an emergent laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Histopathology confirmed normal appendiceal tissue in one specimen and severe acute transmural appendicitis in the other (Fig. 2). There were no postoperative complications. The patient was discharged home in stable condition after 3 days in the hospital.

Duplication in the digestive tract is a rare complication in adults since more than 80% of cases present as an acute abdomen or bowel obstruction before the age of 2.⁴  Appendiceal duplication is extremely rare with an incidence of 0.004% to 0.009% in appendectomy specimens.^5,6  Appendiceal duplication can be isolated or associated with cecal duplication. Appendiceal duplications were first classified in 1936 by Cave,⁷  updated in 1962 by Wallbridge,⁸  and then again by Bierman in 1993.⁹  They classified the major kinds of anomalies into Types A, B, C, and D. Type A has a single cecum with various degrees of incomplete appendiceal duplication. Type B has a normal appendix that arises from the cecum and is subdivided into 4 separate types depending on where the second appendix is located. Type B1 (avian-type appendix) arises symmetrically from the other side of the ileocecal valve; this resembles the arrangement in birds. Type B2 (tenia coli type) arises anywhere along the lines of the tenia coli. Type B3 arises from the hepatic flexure,⁹  and Type B4 arises from the splenic flexure.⁶  Type C is a duplication of the cecum, each containing an appendix. Type D, the most recently described type by Mesko et al in 1986,¹⁰  is a horseshoe appendix—a single appendix with 2 openings into the cecum. A case of appendiceal triplication has also been reported.¹¹  Coker et al¹²  suggested an embryologic etiology for these anomalies (Table 1).¹³ 

Suspicion of a duplicated appendix should prompt further investigation into the possibility of other congenital anomalies, including duplications or anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract or genitourinary tract,¹⁴  gastroschisis,¹⁵  and vertebral anomalies,^5,16  especially in type B1 and C cases.¹⁷  Type B2 duplication is not known to be associated with any other congenital anomalies (Table 1).¹⁷ 

The case described above falls under the Type B2 classification as there were 2 separate appendices attached via separate bases onto the cecum. The duplicate appendix was located over the taenia-coli. Type B2 is the most frequently reported duplication of the appendix.¹⁸ 

Reports of appendicitis in patients with a duplicated appendix are rare in the literature, however, it is likely that many cases are missed simply because the second appendix was never identified. Retrocecal appendices and type B duplications are most likely to remain unnoticed.¹⁷  Identification of the anomaly can be further confounded when the clinical presentation mimics other conditions, such as adenocarcinoma of the colon,¹⁹  small bowel obstruction, volvulus, or intussusception.²⁰  In cases where appendiceal duplication is suspected, histopathologic examination must show a complete and separate inner circular and outer longitudinal muscle layer and the appropriate amount and arrangement of lymphoid tissue to differentiate a duplicate appendix from an appendiceal or solitary cecal diverticulum.²¹ 

Appendiceal duplication should be in the differential diagnosis when a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis does not correlate with the operative finding of a normal looking appendix. Although a very rare entity, ensuring its absence would prevent diagnostic ambiguity. It is recommended that if multiple appendices are located, all of them should be removed to avoid any diagnostic ambiguity in the evaluation of abdominal pain in future. This would also avoid any medicolegal ramifications of a “previously removed” appendix.²² 

Although appendiceal duplication occurs very rarely, awareness of this congenital anomaly and thorough intraoperative inspection are critical to avoid the potential consequences of missing a second appendix, as well as any associated congenital anomalies, and to minimize confusion with other intra-abdominal structures.