Objective

The necessity of radical debridement in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is increasingly challenged. We introduce the 1-stage surgical treatment with 270° retention of the spinal structure via a posterior-only approach and investigate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of this method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.

Summary of Background Data

In former research articles, many potential disadvantages are found in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis after radical debridement, such as prolonged operative time, increased the surgical trauma, unsatisfactory bony fusion, instability of the spine, and too much blood loss.

Methods

Twenty-one patients who had thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis were admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and September 2014. All of them were treated with 1-stage surgical treatment by internal fixation, focal debridement, and fusion via the posterior-only approach. Then, the clinical efficacy was evaluated, with the Cobb angle reflecting spinal kyphotic angles, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Frankel Grade scores, and imaging examination preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

Patients were followed up for 24 to 40 months (mean, 29.95 months), Fusion occurred at 4 to 9 months (mean, 5.86 months). There were significant differences between groups regarding the Cobb angle, ESR, and Frankel Grade scores. Delayed wound healing affected 1 patient because of diabetes. No complications regarding the internal fixation and no tuberculosis recurrence were observed during follow-up.

Conclusions

Combined with anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy, the method, characterized by 270° retention of the spinal structure, can be an effective and feasible method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.

In recent decades, with the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains and the increasing incidence of human inmmunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, total tuberculosis incidence has increased all over the world, especially in developing countries.1,2  Although spinal tuberculosis accounts for less than 1% of patients of tuberculosis, it is a destructive form of tuberculosis destroying the vertebral structure, resulting in kyphosis formation and spinal cord compression.3,4 

Anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy remains the mainstay for treating early stage spinal tuberculosis. However, it could not avoid the spinal cord compression or sequelae of kyphosis in some cases. Therefore, surgical methods still play an important role in treating spinal tuberculosis. The reported surgical treatment methods, including anterior or posterior radical debridement, may result in consequences, such as prolonged operative time, increased surgical trauma, unsatisfactory bony fusion, and instability of the spine.5  Thus, we introduce the 1-stage surgical treatment with 270° retention of the spinal structure via a posterior-only approach, and the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of this method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.

Patient information

From January 2013 to September 2014, we enrolled 21 patients with active spinal tuberculosis of the thoracic or lumbar spine with indications for surgery: (1) progressive neurological deficit; (2) persistent pain caused by instability; (3) severe kyphosis or kyphosis likely to progress; and (4) poor outcomes after conservative chemotherapy. Permission was obtained from the hospital ethics committee before starting this study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal guardians.

Medical records of clinical and operative reports, radiographic images, and pathology reports were extracted. The diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis is determined by nonspecific laboratory findings including blood routine examination, blood chemistry profile, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and by imaging findings such as spine X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).The Cobb angle is measured on spinal X-ray. The involvement of contiguous vertebral end plates, the destruction of vertebrae, and the location of sequestrums were identified on CT. Abscess, spinal cord compression, and destruction of intervertebral discs are observed by MRI. In addition, neurologic status is also evaluated according to the Frankel grade scores.

Preoperative procedure

The patients received antituberculosis drugs after the preliminary diagnosis for at least 3 weeks, together with strict bed rest and measures to improve general condition and nutrition. Antituberculosis drugs included ethambutol (EMB) 750 mg/d, isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/d, pyrazinamide (PZA) 1500 mg/d, rifampicin (RFP) 450 mg/d, and levofloxacin 300 mg/d. Surgery was performed under the cover of chemotherapy. Generally, surgery was performed when physical condition improved obviously.

Surgical method

Given general endotracheal anesthesia in prone position, we made the posterior median longitudinal incision and continued to incise until spinous process and vertebral plate were exposed clearly. In step 1, we set the internal fixation screws through the vertebral pedicle as planned and corrected the kyphosis of certain degree by a rod at the same time. In step 2, we identified the vertebrae according to imaging findings and chose the severely involved side of vertebrae, with the opposite side filled in with gauze. We stripped the unilateral vertebral plate and zygapophyseal joints by rongeur in the chosen side, during which we freed and protected the upper and lower lumbar nerve roots (Fig. 1a and 1c), but sometimes sacrificed the thoracic nerves (Fig. 1b and 1d).Then we entered the targeted space, drained the abscess with negative pressure, and curetted the central lesion (Fig. 1e), which was the involved vertebral body and the intervertebral disc in most cases, with satellite lesions retained. The kind of lesion resection was considered focal debridement instead of radical debridement. In step 3, we resected the appropriate autogenous bone from posterior superior iliac spine (Fig. 1f). After careful disposal, we implanted the bone graft into the debrided space. As the above steps were completed, 270° of the spinal structure remained (Fig. 2). Treatment with streptomycin (1.0 g) was locally administered. A negative pressure drainage tube was routinely fixed on the operated side. The debrided tissue and bone were kept for culture and histopathologic examination.

Fig. 1

During the operation, (a and c) we freed and protected the lumbar nerve (arrow) in treating lumbar tuberculosis, (b and d) but sometimes sacrificed the thoracic nerve (arrow, with the ligature presented) in treating thoracic tuberculosis. (e and f) The surgical procedures also contain curetting the central lesion and resecting the appropriate autogenous bone from the posterior superior iliac spine (c is enlargement of a, and d is enlargement of b).

Fig. 1

During the operation, (a and c) we freed and protected the lumbar nerve (arrow) in treating lumbar tuberculosis, (b and d) but sometimes sacrificed the thoracic nerve (arrow, with the ligature presented) in treating thoracic tuberculosis. (e and f) The surgical procedures also contain curetting the central lesion and resecting the appropriate autogenous bone from the posterior superior iliac spine (c is enlargement of a, and d is enlargement of b).

Close modal
Fig. 2

During the operation, (a–c) we resected the unilateral vertebral plate and zygapophyseal joints and (e and f) implanted the bone graft and kept 270° of the spinal structure.

Fig. 2

During the operation, (a–c) we resected the unilateral vertebral plate and zygapophyseal joints and (e and f) implanted the bone graft and kept 270° of the spinal structure.

Close modal

Postoperative procedure

Antibiotics were administrated during the first week after the operation. The negative pressure drainage tube was pulled out when drainage flow was less than 30 mL/d. The stitches were normally removed 14 days after the operation. Patients were instructed to wear a brace for at least 6 months. The patients were given the antituberculosis drugs for 12 to 18 months postoperatively. ESR and liver and kidney function were examined once a month postoperatively to monitor any adverse reactions of the antituberculosis drugs, and all patients were followed up on an outpatient basis at 3-month intervals for the first 6 months and then 6-month intervals for the next 2 years, and annually for life thereafter. X-rays were performed once a month, and MRIs were taken every 3 months.

Statistical analysis

Mean and standard deviation were used to describe normal distribution data. Median and quartile percentile were used to describe skewed distribution data. Paired t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze the comparison between 2 different times. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the comparison among 3 different times, and the LSD t test was used as the post hoc test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed by PASW Statistics, version 21.0.

Twenty-one consecutive patients with thoracic or lumbar tuberculosis were enrolled in this study, and the characteristics of the patients are described in Table 1. The population comprised 13 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 47.9 (range, 24–73) years. All patients presented with constitutional symptoms such as fatigue, weakness, night sweats, lower fever with weight loss, or other symptoms of different degrees. The most common symptom was dorsal spine pain (90.5%), followed by neurologic complaints (76.2%). Although abscesses of different size were identified in all patients, absolute paraplegia did not occur in this study. On admission, the neurologic compromise function was assessed: 4 cases of grade C, 12 cases of grade D, and 5 cases of grade E. The mean Cobb angle of the 21 cases at diagnosis was 17.24° (range, 8°–25°), and the median ESR was 28 (range, 2–113) mm/h.

Table 1

Clinical data of all patients

Clinical data of all patients
Clinical data of all patients

All 21 patients underwent a 1-stage surgical treatment by internal fixation, focal debridement, and fusion via the posterior-only approach. The mean operation time was 230 (range, 120–300) minutes. The median of intraoperative blood loss was 500 (range, 200–1500) mL. Transfusion volume of blood or blood products ranged from 0 to 1500 mL, and 11 cases did not receive transfusions. The detailed surgery information is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2

General condition and surgical results of the patients

General condition and surgical results of the patients
General condition and surgical results of the patients

For all cases, the mean follow-up period was 29.95 months (range, 15–40 months). After the operation, anemia and hypoproteinemia were corrected in time. The pretreatment ESR ranged from 2 to 113 mm/h, and the postoperative ESR ranged from 5 to 22 mm/h at the 3-month follow-up. The ESR of all patients had significantly decreased (P < 0.05; Table 3). The mean Cobb angles distinctly reduced from 17.24° (range, 8°–25°) preoperatively to 10.38° (range, 5°–16°) in the immediate postoperative period and 12.67° (range, 6°–18°) at final follow-up. The loss of correction was only 2.29° (Fig. 3). The results of post hoc analysis showed there was statistical significance of Cobb angle between each time by LSD t test (P < 0.05; Table 3). During follow-up, the mean bony fusion time is 5.86 (median, 4–9) months. At the last visit, in the 16 patients with preoperative neurologic deficit, 2 with grade C recovered to normal, 2 with grade C recovered to grade D, and 12 with grade D recovered to normal. They had distinct improvement in the Frankel Grade scores postoperatively (P < 0.05; Table 3). Delayed wound healing affected 1 patient because of diabetes, and no sinus formation was observed in the patients. No complications regarding internal fixation and no tuberculosis recurrence were observed during follow-up. All 21 patients obtained complete intervertebral bony fusion (Fig. 4) with a mean time of 5.86 months (range, 4–9 months).

Table 3

Comparison of variables over time

Comparison of variables over time
Comparison of variables over time
Fig. 3

Postoperative correction was successful, and loss of correction was acceptable at the final follow-up (time 1 preoperatively; time 2 postoperatively; time 3 last follow-up).

Fig. 3

Postoperative correction was successful, and loss of correction was acceptable at the final follow-up (time 1 preoperatively; time 2 postoperatively; time 3 last follow-up).

Close modal
Fig. 4

A 34-year-old woman had back pain for 4 months and incomplete paralysis for 2 weeks. On admission, the neurologic deficit was assessed as grade D. (a and b) Preoperative lateral X-ray and CT scan showed involved segments located at L2. (c) Preoperative MRI showed the presence of a local abscess and compressed spinal cord. Radiography showed fixation was in good position postoperatively (d) and at 6-month follow-up (g). (e and f) The graft bone achieved bony fusion successfully. (h) Postoperative MRI showed disappearance of local abscess and no spinal cord compression. At last visit, the patient's Frankel grade recovered to E (e is enlargement of d, and f is enlargement of g).

Fig. 4

A 34-year-old woman had back pain for 4 months and incomplete paralysis for 2 weeks. On admission, the neurologic deficit was assessed as grade D. (a and b) Preoperative lateral X-ray and CT scan showed involved segments located at L2. (c) Preoperative MRI showed the presence of a local abscess and compressed spinal cord. Radiography showed fixation was in good position postoperatively (d) and at 6-month follow-up (g). (e and f) The graft bone achieved bony fusion successfully. (h) Postoperative MRI showed disappearance of local abscess and no spinal cord compression. At last visit, the patient's Frankel grade recovered to E (e is enlargement of d, and f is enlargement of g).

Close modal

Over the last several decades, although various methods have been introduced and applied to treat spinal tuberculosis, therapeutic strategy for spinal tuberculosis is still controversial. As to this disease, supportive therapy and potent antitubercular chemotherapy are used to stop the infectious process, improve physical condition, and accelerate the patients' recovery process. In the meantime, surgical treatment still plays an important role in treating spinal tuberculosis, with the goals of decompression, debridement, and the rebuilding stability to correct deformity of kyphosis. However, the ideal surgical approach for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis still appears controversial.

In 1983, Denis first introduced the 3-column model concept to describe the instability of spinal trauma.6  Spinal tuberculosis mostly affects the anterior and middle spinal column. Thus, the anterior approach, which was considered the gold standard for a long time, could provide direct access to involved segments and allow efficient decompression of the spinal cord.7  However, exposure of the involved segments via an anterior approach would increase surgical trauma, because the segments are blocked by complex anatomical structures especially in thoracic cavity.811  Another practical problem was that a postoperative drainage tube was not easy to install through the thoracic and abdominal cavity. Moreover, it may lead to postoperative hydrothorax and pneumonia. Meanwhile, paravertebral exudate could not be easily drained out and could possibly form encapsulations, potentially leading to relapse. The posterior approach with smaller surgical incisions and minimum surgical trauma could reduce possible postoperative complications. In this study, only 1 patient experienced delayed wound healing because of diabetes, and no severe postoperative complications, including atelectasis, lung infection, and chylothorax, happened. Moreover, postoperative drainage of residual lesions outflowed more easily in the supine position because of gravity.

Another reason for the traditional gold standard of anterior approach is that posterior decompression in spinal tuberculosis should remove the healthy posterior vertebral structures and aggravate spinal instability. Nowadays, the modern pedicle screw could provide rigid fixation and enable adequate stability, which is much better and stronger than anterior fixation.9  Moreover, it could also reach a potent braking effect to correct deformity and avoid the loss of corrected degrees as far as possible.12,13  Meanwhile, fixation and bone graft are far from the lesions in the posterior approach, which could decrease disease relapse.14  In our study, no breaking or loosening in internal fixation occurred during follow-up. The postoperative Cobb angle was significantly improved, and the loss of correction during follow-up was acceptable (2.29°).

The traditional viewpoint restricting the posterior approach comes from the uncertainty of whether the approach can achieve radical resection of the lesion. In a previous study, the posterior approach provides no advantage in radical debridement.15  However, with the development of multiple antituberculosis drugs, tuberculous lesions could be successfully treated by means of spontaneous fusion eventually, and the attempt to radical debridement should not be overemphasized.16,17  When patients have severe spinal tuberculosis with involvement of consecutive multisegmental vertebrae or huge prevertebral abscesses, achieving satisfactory radical debridement by posterior approach is impossible. Nowadays, many surgeons such as Jain1  and Tuli18  noted that posterior laminectomy with extensive structure removed may cause overmuch normal posterior spinal column damaged, potentially making the spine unstable. After radical debridement, the extensive damage to the bone graft bed creates difficulty in obtaining good osseous healing. In addition, Chandler and Cappello19  indicated that a great deal of scar tissue and abnormally proliferated fibrous connective tissue after laminectomy and radical debridement potentially adhered to nerve roots and the dural sac, causing a series of consequent compression symptoms. Focal debridement could overcome the disadvantages of extensive radical debridement by minimizing the damage to spinal integrity, retaining enough vertebral bone substance to guarantee fusion, preventing epidural adhesion, and decreasing the possibility of formation of scar tissue to protect spinal cord. In this study, the postoperative Frankel grade scores was significantly improved at the last visit, and bony fusion occurred with a mean time of 5.86 months. In contrast, autogenous bone grafting is also an important procedure to insure bony fusion. Autogenous bone would generate a satisfied effect of fusion with the minimal possibility of immunologic rejection and secondary infection, whereas 270-degree retention of the spinal structure can ensure the stability as much as possible.

Ideal spinal operations should be well tolerated and nearly minimally invasive, associated with minor postoperative complications and an almost near-normal spine. Thus, we describe the surgical method emphasizing 270° retention of the spinal structure. To the best of our knowledge, no other study has reported this kind of method previously. Thus far, the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of the patients are all satisfactory. Based on our clinical experience, we recommend the indications for the method as follows: (1) stability of the involved segment is lost, and potent internal fixation is in need; (2) patients, reluctant to tolerate or accept the immobilization of lying in bed or wearing the brace for a long time, hope to get out of bed as soon as possible; (3) patients in poor physical conditions have difficulty in accepting 1-stage surgical treatment by anterior approach or surgical treatment by anterior and posterior approach; (4) patients do not have a large abscess, serious spinal canal invasion, and spinal deformity.

Combined with multiple antituberculosis drugs, this method with 270° retention of the spinal structure via the posterior-only approach can maintain spinal column integrity, improve neurologic function, achieve satisfactory bony fusion, decrease postoperative complications, and lead to effective recovery in the end.

1. 
Jain
 
AK.
Tuberculosis of the spine: a fresh look at an old disease.
J Bone Joint Surg Br
2010
;
92
(7)
:
905
913
2. 
Zhang
 
H,
Sheng
 
B,
Tang
 
M,
Guo
 
C,
Liu
 
S,
Huang
 
S
et al.
One-stage surgical treatment for upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via posterior-only approach.
Eur Spine J
2013
;
22
(3)
:
616
623
3. 
Wang
 
X,
Pang
 
X,
Wu
 
P,
Luo
 
C,
Shen
 
X.
One-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation vs. single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.
Eur Spine J
2014
;
23
(4)
:
830
837
4. 
Zhang
 
HQ,
Lin
 
MZ,
Guo
 
HB,
Ge
 
L,
Wu
 
JH,
Liu
 
JY.
One-stage surgical management for tuberculosis of the upper cervical spine by posterior debridement, short-segment fusion, and posterior instrumentation in children.
Eur Spine J
2013
;
22
(1)
:
72
78
5. 
Kumar
 
MN,
Joseph
 
B,
Manur
 
R.
Isolated posterior instrumentation for selected cases of thoraco-lumbar spinal tuberculosis without anterior instrumentation and without anterior or posterior bone grafting.
Eur Spine J
2013
;
22
(3)
:
624
632
6. 
Denis
 
F.
The three-column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
1983
;
8
(8)
:
817
831
7. 
Benli
 
IT,
Acaroğlu
 
E,
Akalin
 
S,
Kiş
 
M,
Duman
 
E,
Un
 
A.
Anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in tuberculosis spondylitis.
Eur Spine J
2003
;
12
(2)
:
224
234
8. 
Jain
 
AK,
Dhammi
 
IK,
Prashad
 
B,
Sinha
 
S,
Mishra
 
P.
Simultaneous anterior decompression and posterior instrumentation of the tuberculous spine using an anterolateral extrapleural approach.
J Bone Joint Surg Br
2008
;
90
(11)
:
1477
1481
9. 
Sundararaj
 
GD.
Simultaneous anterior decompression and posterior instrumentation of the tuberculous spine using an anterolateral extrapleural approach.
J Bone Joint Surg Br
2009
;
91
(5)
:
702
10. 
Pettiford
 
BL,
Schuchert
 
MJ,
Jeyabalan
 
G,
Landreneau
 
JR,
Kilic
 
A,
Landreneau
 
JP
et al.
Technical challenges and utility of anterior exposure for thoracic spine pathology.
Ann Thorac Surg
2008
;
86
(6)
:
1762
1768
11. 
Jiang
 
H1,
Xiao
 
ZM,
Zhan
 
XL,
He
 
ML.
Anterior transsternal approach for treatment of upper thoracic vertebral tuberculosis.
Orthop Surg
2010
;
2
(4)
:
305
309
12. 
Eichholz
 
KM,
Hitchon
 
PW,
From
 
A,
Rubenbauer
 
P,
Nakamura
 
S,
Lim
 
TH.
Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine.
J Neurosurg Spine
2004
;
1
(1)
:
116
121
13. 
Beaubien
 
BP,
Derincek
 
A,
Lew
 
WD,
Wood
 
KB.
In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2005
;
30
(16)
:
1846
1851
14. 
Fukuta
 
S1,
Miyamoto
 
K,
Masuda
 
T,
Hosoe
 
H,
Kodama
 
H,
Nishimoto
 
H
et al
.
Two-stage (posterior and anterior) surgical treatment using posterior spinal instrumentation for pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2003
;
28
(15)
:
E302
E308
15. 
Güzey
 
FK1,
Emel
 
E,
Bas
 
NS,
Hacisalihoglu
 
S,
Seyithanoglu
 
MH,
Karacor
 
SE
et al.
Thoracic and lumbar tuberculous spondylitis treated by posterior debridement, graft placement, and instrumentation: a retrospective analysis in 19 cases.
J Neurosurg Spine
2005
;
3
(6)
:
450
458
16. 
Rajasekaran
 
S.
The problem of deformity in spinal tuberculosis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2002
;
398
:
85
92
17. 
Pande
 
KC,
Babhulkar
 
SS.
Atypical spinal tuberculosis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2002
;
398
:
67
74
18. 
Tuli
 
SM.
Tuberculosis of the spine: a historical review.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2007
;
460
:
29
38
19. 
Chandler
 
K,
Cappello
 
R.
Laminectomy membrane formation in dogs: is the answer still elusive?
Vet J
2006
;
172
(1)
:
1
2

Author notes

W. Miao, T. Meng, and J. Yang contributed equally to this work.