Relationship Between Athletic Trainer Access, Socioeconomic Status, and Race and Ethnicity in United States Secondary Schools

Extensive research has exposed healthcare disparities regarding socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity demographics. Previous research has shown significant differences in access to athletic training services (AT access) in the secondary school setting based on SES, but with limited samples.

This study investigated differences in AT access based on race/ethnicity and SES on a national scale.

Cross-sectional study

Database study using secondary analysis. Data were collected from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Athletic Training Location and Services (ATLAS) database, and US Census Bureau.

10,983 public schools.

Descriptive data was summarized by measures of central tendency. A one-way ANOVA determined differences between school characteristics: median household income (MHI), percent of students eligible for free and reduced lunch (%FRL), percent white students, and percent non-white students based on AT access: Full-time (FT-AT), part-time (PT-AT), and no athletic trainer (no-AT). A Bonferroni pairwise comparison was used for variables with significant main effects.

Across all schools included in the study, 43.8% had no-AT (n=4,812), 23.5% had PT-AT access (n=2,581), and 32.7% had FT-AT access (n=3,590). There were significant effects between AT access and MHI (p<.001), %FLR (p<.001), percent white (p<.001), and percent non-white (p<.001). FT-AT schools had a higher SES when compared to PT-AT and no-AT schools. Significant differences existed between AT access groups and race/ethnicity of schools. Schools with FT-AT had a significantly lower percent of non-white students (31.3%) compared to schools with no-AT (46.0%) (p<.001). No significant differences between FT-AT and PT-AT based on race/ethnicity demographics presented (p≥.13).

Schools with higher SES had greater AT access; whereas, schools with a higher percentage of non-white students were more likely to have no AT access, demonstrating the disparities in healthcare extends to athletic healthcare as well. To increase AT access, future initiatives should address the inequities where larger minority populations and counties of lower SES exist.