Coaches play an important role in concussion safety, and their views on concussion influence those of their athletes and the athletes’ reporting behaviors. In this 2021 survey of youth, we examined how often coaches provide concussion safety information to their athletes and the association between coaches’ provision of concussion information to athletes and the presence of athletic trainers (ATs) at a team’s games and practices. More than 4 in 10 youth who played sports reported that their coaches did not provide any sort of concussion education or information to them in the past 12 months. Among those youth who always or sometimes had ATs at practices or games, 76.3% received some type of coach education on concussion in the past 12 months, compared with 31.9% of those who rarely or never had ATs at practices or games (P < .0001). Increasing access to ATs and adapting current concussion training and educational materials for coaches to increase coach-athlete communication may be beneficial.

Sports, in particular contact sports such as tackle football, are a leading activity in which concussions and mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) are sustained by youth.1  For most youth, concussion symptoms resolve within 2 weeks to 2 months.2–4  Youth with a prior concussion are more likely to experience a prolonged recovery and more severe symptom presentation after a recurrent injury.5  Thus, if a concussion is suspected, medical consensus states that the athlete should be immediately removed from practice or competition and should not return to play the same day of the injury.6  Delaying removal from play after a concussion may result in prolonged recovery, severe symptoms, and a risk for repeat injury to the brain, leading to potentially catastrophic consequences.7  As such, concussion in sports laws around the country dictate that coaches receive training on concussion identification and response, including the importance of immediately removing an athlete from practice or competition after a possible concussion.

Responsibility for an athlete’s removal from practice or competition after a suspected concussion largely falls on the coach due to the absence of on-site health care providers. Adding to the complexity of this responsibility, some concussion signs may be difficult to discern and may not be visible or can have a delayed onset.6  Therefore, coaches often need to rely on symptom reporting from athletes who, for a variety of reasons (eg, acting “tough,” a desire to continue to play, a lack of understanding of the potential seriousness of their injury, and peer or adult pressure to continue to play), may be hesitant to report symptoms.8  Researchers have showed that, overall, concussion knowledge among coaches who access and complete concussion training is high9  and coach communication and views on concussion influence those of their athletes.10  However, less is known about whether and how often coaches discuss concussion safety with their athletes. Furthermore, some schools employ a full- or part-time athletic trainer (AT) to serve as an on-field health care provider. Although the presence of ATs is associated with greater concussion identification among high school football athletes,11  little is known about whether their presence affects coach-athlete communication on concussion. Thus, in this project, we aimed to answer the following questions: (1) Do coaches provide concussion safety information to their athletes? and (2) What is the association between the provision of concussion safety information and the presence of ATs at practices and games?

Self-report data were analyzed from the youth wave (YouthStyles) of Porter Novelli’s 2021 ConsumerStyles survey.12  In June 2021, youth ages 12 to 17 years residing with parents who were members of the Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel and completed the 2021 SummerStyles survey were invited to answer the annual YouthStyles web-based survey. Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel adult SummerStyles members are randomly recruited using probability-based sampling and include respondents regardless of whether they have landline phones or internet access. Adult SummerStyles panel members participated in a corresponding survey immediately before their child’s YouthStyles participation and provided electronic consent for the youth to participate. A total of 833 adolescents (out of 1751 sampled parents) qualified, resulting in a completion rate of 47.6%. Adults who completed the survey received 10 000 cash-equivalent reward points (worth approximately $10), and youth received an additional 5000 points (worth approximately $5). Data were weighted to be nationally representative based on sex, age, race or ethnicity, education, household income and size, US census region, metropolitan status, and parental status of children ages 12 to 17 years. No personally identifying information was included in the data file provided to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).* Access to SummerStyles data was granted through a data use agreement with Porter Novelli Public Services.

As part of a separate project examining the effect of question wording on mTBI reporting, respondents were randomly assigned to receive 1 of the following 2 questions to assess self-reported lifetime history of a brain injury (full survey is provided in the Appendix):

  1. In your lifetime, do you believe that you have ever had a concussion?

  2. In your lifetime, do you believe that you have ever had a mild traumatic brain injury?

Although a higher proportion of respondents reported having sustained a concussion (11.3%) than an mTBI (5.5%) during their lifetime, no differences were seen in the outcome of interest (ie, concussion safety). Therefore, responses to these 2 questions were combined to create a dichotomous “yes, concussion or mTBI” or “no, no concussion or mTBI” variable. Henceforth, all self-reported brain injuries will be referred to jointly as mTBIs. Four respondents were dropped from the analysis due to their failure to complete the mTBI questions, for a total analytic sample of 829 youth.

All respondents, regardless of their mTBI experience, were asked a series of questions regarding their past 12 months of sports participation. Questions included whether their coaches provided them with concussion safety information, how concerned they believed their coaches were about concussion safety, and the frequency of an AT presence at practices or games (see the Appendix for the full survey). We analyzed all data using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc) and SPSS (version 29.0; IBM Corp). Frequency distributions were calculated for each question. We conducted χ2 tests to determine if providing safety information differed by the presence of ATs. The complex survey design was considered in the analysis.12 

Sample Description

The demographic composition of the respondents is shown in Table 1. One in 12 (8.3%) respondents reported sustaining an mTBI in their lifetime (Table 2). Approximately 19.1% of respondents participated in only a school-based sport in the past 12 months, 13.2% participated in only a nonschool-based sports league, and 6.9% participated in both. Youth who played sports had a higher prevalence of lifetime mTBI (12.9%) than those who did not play any sports (5.0%; P = .0044; results not shown). More than 9 in 10 youth (91.5%) who reported participating in sports in the past 12 months played a contact or limited-contact sport, and about 21.2% played a noncontact sport (the categories were not mutually exclusive).

Table 1

Characteristics of Respondents in the 2021 Porter Novelli YouthStyles Sample (N = 829)

Characteristics of Respondents in the 2021 Porter Novelli YouthStyles Sample (N = 829)
Characteristics of Respondents in the 2021 Porter Novelli YouthStyles Sample (N = 829)
Table 2

Lifetime Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prevalence, Sports Participation, and Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes

Lifetime Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prevalence, Sports Participation, and Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes
Lifetime Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prevalence, Sports Participation, and Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes

Lifetime Concussion and mTBI Prevalence, Sports Participation, and Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes

About 47.0% of youth who played sports indicated that their coaches talked to them about concussion, 32.0% indicated that their coaches gave them a printed handout about concussion, and 22.9% indicated that their coaches sent them an email or had them watch a video about concussion in the last 12 months. Overall, 57.5% of youth who played sports reported that their coaches provided any sort of concussion education or information to them in the past 12 months; this percentage was higher among youth who played only school sports (65.0%) than youth who played only nonschool sports (39.1%; data not shown). Two-thirds of respondents (66.0%) agreed or strongly agreed that their coaches were concerned about concussion safety. About half noted that they always or sometimes had ATs at practices (54.7%) or games (54.5%) in the past 12 months; overall, 63.4% of youth athletes always or sometimes had ATs at practices or games in the last 12 months. Always or sometimes having access to ATs was more common among youth who played only school sports than those who played only nonschool sports (71.6% and 49.3%, respectively; data not shown).

Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes by Access to an AT

Always or sometimes having an AT at practices or games was associated with a greater proportion of coaches providing concussion education to their athletes (Table 3). Among those who always or sometimes had ATs at their practices or games, 63.3% reported that a coach talked to them about concussion compared with 23.9% of those who rarely or never had ATs at practices or games (P < .0001). Similarly, among those who always or sometimes had ATs at practices or games, 41.6% were given a handout about concussions from coaches, in contrast to the 20.4% given a handout who rarely or never had ATs at practices or games (P = .0014). Also, among the youth who always or sometimes had ATs at practices or games, 33.5% received an email or watched a video from their coaches about concussion safety, compared with 8.8% of those who rarely or never had ATs at practices or games (P < .0001). Overall, among those youth who always or sometimes had ATs at practices or games, 76.2% received some type of coach education on concussion in the past 12 months compared with 31.9% of those who rarely or never had ATs at practices or games (P < .0001).

Table 3

Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes by Access to an Athletic Trainer

Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes by Access to an Athletic Trainer
Concussion Safety Experience and Attitudes by Access to an Athletic Trainer

Prevalence of mTBI

This study demonstrated that mTBI is common among youth, as 8.5% of adolescents reported a lifetime mTBI. Additionally, those who had played sports in the past year had a higher prevalence of lifetime mTBI than those who had not. Concerns about repeat concussions or mTBIs, as well as the possible long-term effects of concussions and mTBIs on young athletes, have led to several efforts to address concussion prevention and response among youth. Unfortunately, in 1 investigation,13  more than 50% of high school athletes did not report their concussions, which compromises the ability of coaches, health care professionals, and others to protect them from the potentially harmful consequences of concussions and mTBIs. Common reasons for not reporting concussions or mTBIs include inadequate understanding of the seriousness of the injury, not wanting to be removed from play, and not wanting to let teammates down.13 

Provision of Concussion Safety Information

Researchers14  have suggested that coach communication with athletes about concussion increases the likelihood of symptom reporting by helping to set safety-promoting norms regarding reporting and being removed from play when injured. Supporting this effort includes building awareness of concussion among coaches and providing education. High school coaches are required to receive educational materials or training about concussion in nearly all states.15  Still, despite these widespread efforts, 2 in 5 youth athletes in this study indicated that they did not receive any concussion information from their coaches in the past 12 months. Coaches may not communicate with athletes about concussion due to a lack of objective criteria for diagnosis and recovery of concussion, pressure to win, and the belief that they should defer to the medical staff because it is not their role.16  Conversely, other efforts to improve coach-athlete communication about concussion include focusing educational materials on improving coaches’ attitudes and beliefs about concussion17  and educational interventions addressing the importance of encouraging coach concussion communication.18 

Effects of the AT’s Presence on the Provision of Concussion Safety Information

Coaches value communication with medical staff about athlete health and often describe a positive relationship.16  We found that always or sometimes having access to an AT at practices or games was positively associated with the provision of education to athletes by coaches. Although this result is encouraging and despite the well-documented benefits to athlete safety, expanding access to ATs is an ongoing challenge. Data collected as part of the Athletic Training Locations and Services Project demonstrated that access to AT services varied widely by state; only 1% of secondary schools in Alaska had full-time AT services versus 80% of secondary schools in New Jersey.19  We determined that as many as a third of athletes rarely or never had any AT access at practices or games, which closely matches national estimates.19  Additionally, AT access was more common among youth who played only school sports than those who played only nonschool sports. Earlier authors11  noted that access to ATs increased concussion identification among athletes. This information is vital, as ATs play a key role in concussion prevention efforts in primary prevention (preventing concussions), secondary prevention (identifying and diagnosing concussions), and tertiary prevention (managing athletes with concussions). Furthermore, ATs help ensure that athletes do not return to play prematurely, thereby decreasing the potential long-term effects of concussion and the risk of sustaining a repeat concussion. High schools with greater AT access had better engagement with coaches and parents, which increased the likelihood that management recommendations (eg, limiting early return to sport and monitoring school performance and physical exercise) were being followed.20  As the AT’s role in concussion safety involves working with various stakeholders (eg, coaches, parents, school professionals, and athletes themselves), the CDC, in partnership with the National Athletic Trainers’ Association, created an online training course for ATs that includes best practices for implementing concussion safety and response plans, as well as how to bring stakeholders together to promote a culture of concussion safety.21 

Limitations

Our study was subject to at least 2 limitations. First, the data only allowed for reporting associations, not causality. It is possible that the types of environments that have a greater AT presence are the same environments that have a more robust safety culture overall and thus are more likely to require that coaches provide concussion information to athletes. Second, data in the survey were based on self-reports and are therefore subject to recall bias. However, the data do provide preliminary findings that can be used to inform larger, more robust studies.

Several efforts to promote concussion safety among coaches have been implemented over the last decade. Still, 2 in 5 youth athletes in this study indicated that they did not receive any concussion information from their coaches in the past 12 months. Increasing access to ATs and adapting current concussion training and educational materials for coaches to increase their focus on the importance of coach-athlete communication may be beneficial.

1.
Sarmiento
 
K
,
Thomas
 
KE
,
Daugherty
 
J
, et al
Emergency department visits for sports- and recreation-related traumatic brain injuries among children—United States, 2010–2016
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
.
2019
;
68
(10)
:
237
242
.
2.
Barlow
 
KM
,
Crawford
 
S
,
Stevenson
 
A
,
Sandhu
 
SS
,
Belanger
 
F
,
Dewey
 
D.
Epidemiology of postconcussion syndrome in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury
.
Pediatrics
.
2010
;
126
(2)
:
e374
e381
.
3.
Williams
 
RM
,
Puetz
 
TW
,
Giza
 
CC
,
Broglio
 
SP.
Concussion recovery time among high school and collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Sports Med
.
2015
;
45
(6)
:
893
903
.
4.
Thomas
 
DJ
,
Coxe
 
K
,
Li
 
H
, et al
Length of recovery from sports-related concussions in pediatric patients treated at concussion clinics
.
Clin J Sport Med
.
2018
;
28
(1)
:
56
63
.
5.
Castile
 
L
,
Collins
 
CL
,
McIlvain
 
NM
,
Comstock
 
RD.
The epidemiology of new versus recurrent sports concussions among high school athletes, 2005–2010
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2012
;
46
(8)
:
603
610
.
6.
McCrory
 
P
,
Meeuwisse
 
W
,
Dvorak
 
J
, et al
Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Berlin, October 2016
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2017
;
51
(11)
:
838
847
.
7.
Elbin
 
RJ
,
Sufrinko
 
A
,
Schatz
 
P
, et al
Removal from play after concussion and recovery time
.
Pediatrics
.
2016
;
138
(3)
:
e20160910
.
8.
Chandran
 
A
,
Nedimyer
 
AK
,
Kerr
 
ZY
,
O’Neal
 
C
,
Mensch
 
J
,
Yeargin
 
SW.
Concussion knowledge, attitudes, and self-reporting intentions in youth athletes
.
J Athl Train
.
2020
;
55
(10)
:
1027
1034
.
9.
Daugherty
 
J
,
DePadilla
 
L
,
Sarmiento
 
K.
Effectiveness of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HEADS UP coaches’ online training as an educational intervention
.
Health Educ J
.
2019
;
78
(7)
:
784
797
.
10.
Perlin
 
A
,
Kroshus
 
E.
Content analysis of concussion education for coaches of youth and high school sport
.
Brain Inj
.
2020
;
34
(7)
:
905
913
.
11.
Kroshus
 
E
,
Rivara
 
FP
,
Whitlock
 
KB
,
Herring
 
SA
,
Chrisman
 
SPD.
Disparities in athletic trainer staffing in secondary school sport: implications for concussion identification
.
Clin J Sport Med
.
2017
;
27
(6)
:
542
547
.
12.
ConsumerStyles & YouthStyles
.
Porter Novelli
.
13.
McCrea
 
M
,
Hammeke
 
T
,
Olsen
 
G
,
Leo
 
P
,
Guskiewicz
 
K.
Unreported concussion in high school football players: implications for prevention
.
Clin J Sport Med
.
2004
;
14
(1)
:
13
17
.
14.
Baugh
 
CM
,
Kroshus
 
E
,
Daneshvar
 
DH
,
Stern
 
RA.
Perceived coach support and concussion symptom-reporting: differences between freshmen and non-freshmen college football players
.
J Law Med Ethics
.
2014
;
42
(3)
:
314
322
.
15.
Sullivan
 
L
,
Harvey
 
HH
,
Smith
 
GA
,
Yang
 
J.
Putting policy into practice: school-level compliance with and implementation of state concussion laws
.
J Public Health Manag Pract
.
2020
;
26
(Suppl 2)
:
S84
S92
.
16.
Chrisman
 
SPD
,
Gomez
 
D
,
Kroshus
 
E
, et al
Developing a conceptual model of coach concussion communication by adapting the theory of planned behavior and the social ecological model
.
J Am Coll Health
.
2021
;
16
:
1
8
.
17.
Kroshus
 
E
,
Baugh
 
CM
,
Hawrilenko
 
MJ
,
Daneshvar
 
DH.
Determinants of coach communication about concussion safety in US collegiate sport
.
Ann Behav Med
.
2015
;
49
(4)
:
532
541
.
18.
Chrisman
 
SPD
,
Kroshus
 
E
,
Garrett
 
K
, et al
Effectiveness of an education platform (GoHuddle) for increasing likelihood of coach concussion communication with athletes
.
J Neurotrauma
.
2021
;
38
(22)
:
3119
3125
.
19.
Huggins
 
RA
,
Coleman
 
KA
,
Attanasio
 
SM
, et al
Athletic trainer services in the secondary school setting: the athletic training locations and services project
.
J Athl Train
.
2019
;
54
(11)
:
1129
1139
.
20.
McGuine
 
TA
,
Pfaller
 
AY
,
Post
 
EG
,
Hetzel
 
SJ
,
Brooks
 
A
,
Broglio
 
SP.
The influence of athletic trainers on the incidence and management of concussions in high school athletes
.
J Athl Train
.
2018
;
53
(11)
:
1017
1024
.
21.
CDC Heads Up
.
Safe brain. Stronger future
.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed August 22, 2022. http://www.cdc.gov/HEADSUP
*

The CDC licensed these data from Porter Novelli Public Services. Although Porter Novelli Public Services and its vendors are not subject to CDC Institutional Review Board review, they do adhere to all professional standards and codes of conduct set forth by the Council of American Survey Research Organizations. Respondents are informed that their answers are being used for market research, and they may refuse to answer any question at any time.

Appendix. Youth Styles 2021 Surveya

(Note: Questions 1a and 1b were randomized so that half of respondents were shown each version.)

Question 1a

In your lifetime, do you believe that you have ever had a concussion?

Select one.

Question 1b

In your lifetime, do you believe that you have ever had a mild traumatic brain injury?

Select one.

Question 2

Do you currently or did you participate in an individual or team sport during the last 12 months?

Select all that apply.

Question 3

Which sport(s) did you participate in?

Select all.

Question 4

Did your coach(es) talk to you about concussion within the last 12 months?

Select one.

Question 5

Did your coach(es) give you a printed handout or make you read about concussion within the last 12 months?

Select one.

Question 6

Did your coach(es) send you an email or have you watch a video about concussion within the last 12 months?

Select one.

Question 7

My coach(es) is/are concerned about concussion safety.

Select one.

Question 8

How often did you have an athletic trainer at practices in the last 12 months?

Select one.

Question 9

How often did you have an athletic trainer at games in the last 12 months?

Select one.

Question 10

When is a good age for kids to start playing tackle football?

Select one.

Question 11

Do you think it is safe for kids to play tackle football?

Select one.