This study examines the effect of the reviewer role on tax professionals' advocacy bias. Prior research establishes the prevalence of advocacy bias and focuses on whether reviewers can detect preparers' advocacy bias; however, this study examines whether the reviewer role influences tax professionals' judgment and decision-making processes. In an experiment randomly assigning 75 tax professionals to the reviewer and preparer roles, I find professionals who occupy the reviewer role report similar advocacy attitudes to preparers but are significantly less likely to exhibit advocacy bias than preparers. Reviewers also employ a more consistent decision process than those in a preparer role. Results highlight the reviewer role as a moderator of advocacy bias, demonstrating the importance of the reviewer role for firms and clients. Understanding the effects of review responsibilities on professionals at all levels is increasingly important as firms leverage emerging technology to complete tasks traditionally assigned to less experienced professionals.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 12 2021
Mitigating Advocacy Bias: The Effect of the Reviewer Role on Tax Professional Judgment
Mary E Marshall
Mary E Marshall
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of the American Taxation Association JATA-18-060.
Article history
Received:
October 25 2018
Accepted:
January 11 2021
Citation
Mary E Marshall; Mitigating Advocacy Bias: The Effect of the Reviewer Role on Tax Professional Judgment. Journal of the American Taxation Association doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/JATA-18-060
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
0
Views
0
Citations