We use a regulatory shock to examine whether the prospect of short selling affected tax disclosures. From May 2005 to August 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission initiated a pilot program under Regulation SHO, temporarily exempting one-third of the Russell 3000 index firms from short sale price tests, reducing short selling costs. Before the pilot program, we find that pilot firms' income tax footnote disclosures are similar to non-pilot firms. During the pilot program, we find that pilot firms have more readable income tax footnotes than non-pilot firms. The words describing tax activities also changed for tax aggressive pilot firms. In further tests, we observe greater readability among pilot firms led by senior executives whose personal wealth is more sensitive to stock price changes. After the pilot program ends, the differences between pilot and non-pilot firms disappear. These results suggest that the prospect of short selling affects tax disclosures.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
Research Article|
December 17 2020
Short Selling and Tax Disclosure: Evidence from Regulation SHO
Thomas R. Kubick;
Thomas R. Kubick
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Associate Professor
Accounting
730 N 14
P.O. Box 880488
UNITED STATES
Lincoln
NE
68588-0488
402-472-1729
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas C. Omer;
Thomas C. Omer
University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiao Song
Xiao Song
University of Nebraska–Omaha
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of the American Taxation Association (2020)
Article history
Received:
February 06 2020
Revision Received:
May 19 2020
Revision Received:
October 28 2020
Revision Received:
December 11 2020
Accepted:
December 14 2020
Citation
Thomas R. Kubick, Thomas C. Omer, Xiao Song; Short Selling and Tax Disclosure: Evidence from Regulation SHO. Journal of the American Taxation Association doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/JATA-2020-010
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
14
Views
0
Citations