Evidence for the effectiveness of acute and chronic stretching for improving range of motion is extensive. Improved flexibility can positively impact performances in activities of daily living and both physical and mental health. However, less is known about the effects of stretching on other aspects of health such as injury incidence and balance. The objective of this review is to examine the existing literature in these areas. The review highlights that both pre-exercise and chronic stretching can reduce musculotendinous injury incidence, particularly in running-based sports, which may be related to the increased force available at longer muscle lengths (altered force-length relationship) or reduced active musculotendinous stiffness, among other factors. Evidence regarding the acute effects of stretching on balance is equivocal. Longer-term stretch training can improve balance, which may contribute to a decreased incidence of falls and associated injuries and may thus be recommended as an important exercise modality in those with balance deficits. Hence, both acute and chronic stretching seem to have positive effects on injury incidence and balance, but optimum training plans are yet to be defined.

Both acute and chronic (i.e., longer-term) muscle stretching can increase active and passive range of motion (ROM) at both a targeted joint (15) as well as other nonstretched (nonlocal) homologous and heterologous joints (3,6). The stretch-induced ROM increase has been postulated to improve physical performance by permitting more expansive limb movements during actions that necessitate an augmented ROM, such as in gymnastics, figure skating, and combat sports, among many other actions and sports (1,3) (see Side Bar 1). Even activities of daily living, such as the ability to put on shoes and socks or bend to collect an object from the ground can be negatively affected by poor flexibility, impacting an individual's physical independence. In aging populations, poor joint mobility can compromise balance (7) and gait (8), contributing to an increased chance of falling (9). Another more clinical example is the inability of people with diabetes to inspect their extremities due to poor flexibility, which could have serious health consequences due to a lack of appropriate monitoring of ulcers and sores. Furthermore, ROM can be compromised in other clinical populations, such as when stroke, arthritis, muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, cerebral palsy, and other conditions adversely affect health and functional ability.

An increased resistance to stretch can make daily movements more difficult. The extent of passive and active stretch resistance may be related to the degree of collagenous perimysial tissue (1012) as well as the number of strongly (during active muscle contraction) and possibly, to a small degree, weakly bound (during muscle lengthening) cross-bridge attachments between the myofilaments (1315). During rapid stretches, reflexive activation of the stretched muscle as well as viscous effects will add to the resistance to stretch. Decreasing the stretch resistance reduces the resistance to the intended movement and improves movement efficiency (3,16,17), whether for an athlete or during locomotion (e.g., walking and stair climbing) for a senior adult, impacting movement and both musculoskeletal and overall health. With such potential musculoskeletal benefits of an increased ROM and decreased resistance to stretch during ROM, it might be expected that static stretching (SS) should be universally promoted.

Additionally, substantial static stretch-related cardiovascular and stress-related health benefits have been reported (18), with moderate magnitude improvements in cardiovascular parameters such as reduced arterial stiffness (19,20) and endothelium-dependent vasodilation and angiogenesis (21) after both acute and chronic stretching. The consistent application of SS can induce greater parasympathetic influence (22) and reduce chronic stress, stress perception, and cortisol release (23). Thus, the health benefits associated with stretching training, in addition to increases in ROM and decreased resistance, are both strong and convincing.

An expansive body of literature has reported performance impairments shortly after prolonged SS (>60 seconds per muscle group) when performed without additional dynamic warmup activities (1,2,2426). SS involves lengthening a muscle-tendon unit (MTU) until a given level of stretch sensation or to the point of discomfort and then holding the MTU in a lengthened position for a prescribed period (2,24,27,28). This literature detailing the potential negative acute effects of SS on force production led to a paradigm shift from the promotion of SS to its near exclusion, particularly as an essential component of a pre-exercise warmup (3). Nonetheless, when appropriate durations of SS (<60 seconds per muscle group) are incorporated into a full preexercise warmup (comprising aerobic activity, static and dynamic stretching [DS], and dynamic activity), the evidence shows only trivial effects on subsequent strength, power, agility, sprint, and muscle endurance among other performance measures (1,2,2932). Although these preactivity stretching recommendations have been published in reviews since 2011 (1,2,2426), there is still some reluctance to promote and incorporate SS into fitness and health regimens.

While the limitations in study designs used to examine the effects of pre-exercise SS (see appendix and supplement 7 in Behm et al. (2)) have sown some mistrust in the use of SS for pre-exercise preparation, there is also conflict and confusion regarding its efficacy for reducing musculotendinous injury incidence (2), overuse injuries (e.g., distance running) (33), or all-cause injury incidence (3436).

Although the focus of stretching is typically to increase the extensibility (defined as the ability of a muscle to extend to a predetermined endpoint) of muscles and tendons (37) to increase joint ROM (musculoskeletal and connective tissue components), stretching can have widespread effects on injury incidence and balance. The potential effects of stretching on these factors are of substantial clinical importance for the health and independence of individuals in athletic, aged, and a range of clinical populations. The objective of this narrative review is to examine the impact of acute and chronic stretching on factors that could influence health issues such as injury incidence and balance.

SIDE BAR 1: STRETCHING PRESCRIPTIONS
  1. Chronic increase in range of motion (ROM):

    • Separate training session distinct from warmup activities,

    • 2–6 days per week,

    • 30 to 60 seconds per muscle group,

    • Minimum 5 minutes per week per muscle group,

    • 60%–100% of stretch tolerance (point of discomfort).

  2. Pre-activity preparation for athletic performance to acutely increase ROM, having trivial or positive effects on performance (e.g., strength, power, agility, sprint), and providing pre-event psychological preparation:

    • <60 seconds of static stretching per muscle group;

    • Within a full warmup that includes initial ≥5-minute aerobic activity, static and dynamic stretching (≥90 seconds per muscle group), and subsequent 5–15 minutes of dynamic sport or task-specific activities.

  3. Reduction in musculotendinous injury incidence:

    • Chronic static and acute ballistic (increased tendon compliance) stretching;

    • ≥30 seconds per muscle group (may perform multiple shorter stretches to achieve total time);

    • ≥5 minutes per target muscle groups (e.g., stretching for running would involve ≥5 minutes of stretching of the quadriceps, hamstrings, triceps surae, hip adductors, and abductors before lower-limb activities such as walking, running, and jumping).

Traditionally, stretching was purported to increase ROM and consequently decrease injury incidence (3,38). However, there is a lack of consistent evidence for this effect on injuries (15), which may be linked to the type of injuries reported in many studies. Regarding randomized, controlled trials of the effect of SS during warmup on injury risk, the initial evidence came predominately from studies with military personnel. Pope et al. (39) examined Australian military personnel over 12 weeks of training and reported a significant correlation between dorsiflexion ROM and injury incidence (ankle sprains, tibia or foot stress fractures, tibial periostitis, Achilles' tendinopathy, and anterior tibial component syndrome). In that study, having a limited ROM increased the risk for injury 2.5-fold compared with individuals with average dorsiflexion ROM and eightfold greater risk than individuals with high levels of flexibility. Similar relationships have more recently been reported in a systematic review (27 articles) of a general adult population by de la Motte et al. (40), who provided moderate evidence that increased hamstrings and plantar flexors extensibility were associated with decreased musculoskeletal injury risk. However, when a 12-week dorsiflexion stretch training program (2 × 20-second calf muscle stretches before vigorous exercise sessions) for the Australian military was instituted by Pope et al. (39), no statistical effect on injury incidence was detected. A subsequent study, in which recruits who were undertaking 12 weeks of basic training stretched each of 6 lower leg muscles before all physical training sessions (41), again did not reveal a clinically worthwhile reduction in all-cause lower limb injury incidence (including lower body stress fractures, muscle strains, ligament sprains, periostitis, tendinopathy meniscal lesions, compartment syndromes, and bursitis, among others). Together, the studies by Pope et al. (39,41) indicate that, while intrinsic levels of flexibility (ROM) are associated with injury incidence, the imposition of stretch training programs may not influence overall injury rates, at least in military personnel who presumably perform many activities that would not be commonly performed during standard exercise or sports session. However, their data also indicate a lower incidence of thigh muscle strains (80%: 10 versus 2 injuries with stretch training group) and ankle joint injuries (30%: 27 versus 19 injuries in the stretch trained group) within the cohort. These were not specifically (independently) submitted to statistical analysis within the study but were reflected in several reviews (35,42) that reported a lack of significant reduction in all-cause injury risk in response to chronic stretching. Consistent with these specific data, Amako et al. (43) compared military personnel who performed pre-exercise SS of 18 muscle groups over a 3-month period and found no effect on all-cause injury risk but a significant reduction in musculotendinous injuries (and low back pain) in the SS group (13 injuries in 518 recruits in SS versus 22 injuries in 383 recruits in control). A similar lack of significant or clinically important positive effects of SS on all-cause injury risk was reported in a 12-week randomized control trial (30 seconds SS of 7 lower limb and trunk muscle groups before and after physical activity) of 2377 physically active adults (44). Despite these data, Weldon and Hill (36) lamented the paucity of well-controlled studies and speculated that pre-exercise stretching might even increase injury risk. They speculated that injury risk could be increased due to a stretch-induced elevation of the pain (stretch) threshold, allowing individuals to elongate muscles or tendons beyond a point of damage or when performing high-intensity stretching that induced minor muscle damage. While there is no evidence of an increase in injury risk, it is potentially problematic that few randomized, controlled trials have been completed in sports and exercise populations, the quality of these randomized controlled trials is generally low, they do not investigate the effect of preexercise stretching on musculotendinous injuries, and none include elderly or clinical populations.

It is important when reviewing the literature to be cognizant of the type of injuries examined. A review by Behm et al. (2) reported that 8 studies showed some effectiveness of chronic stretching for reducing injury incidence, whereas 4 other studies indicated no significant effect. In a randomized, single-blind, nonsupervised (self-reports), controlled trial, self-reported muscle, ligament, and tendon injuries were reduced in distance runners (2125 participants with 687 people reporting at least 1 injury) who chronically stretched before and after running for 12 weeks (0.66 injuries per person-year in stretch group versus 0.88 injuries per person-year in control) (44). Additionally, Woods et al. (45) concluded that chronic stretch training, performed with or without warmup before exercise, was associated with a lower incidence of MTU injuries. Furthermore, Azuma and Someya (46) incorporated a 12-week stretching program with male high school soccer players, finding an improved ROM and a decrease in muscle tightness, which they indicated may have contributed to the reduction in noncontact lower limb and trunk injuries as well as muscle and tendon injuries after training. Based on this evidence, while stretching may not consistently attenuate all-cause injury risk, a small-moderate positive effect of chronic SS on MTU injury risk in running- and jump-based sports is observed (38,47).

Pre-exercise bouts of stretching can also have positive effects on reducing subsequent injuries. For example, the Behm et al. (2) review summarized that pre-exercise stretching of 5 minutes or more should provide greater sprint running-related injury prevention but would be less effective in reducing overuse injuries, such as with endurance running activities. They found a mean 54% injury risk reduction across studies in MTU injuries when acute (i.e., pre-exercise) SS was completed (2). Similarly, a review by Fradkin et al. (34) reported that 3 of 5 studies reviewed showed significant decreases in all-cause injury risk when a warmup including stretching was performed before exercise and a lack of evidence that stretching could increase injury incidence. McKay et al. (48) monitored 3 elite (22% of study participants) and 3 recreational (78% of study participants) competitions with over 10,000 players and reported that basketball players who did not stretch before a game had a 2.6-fold greater likelihood of ankle injuries than players who did stretch. Dadebo (49) found that implementing SS in a warmup (recommendation: 4 × 15–30 seconds) was associated with reduced hamstring strains in Premiership soccer players in England. Also, Cross and Worrell (50) reported a 50% reduction in muscle-tendon strains (195 American football players) when SS was performed in a warmup during the 1995 season compared with warmups without SS in the 1994 season. Based on such evidence, Small et al. (35) concluded in their review that there was moderate to strong evidence that SS did not attenuate overall injury rates but may reduce MTU injuries. Thus, an acute bout of pre-exercise stretching may influence injury across soft tissue types. Based on these reports, there seems to be a reasonable (moderate) effect of acute SS within a pre-exercise warmup on the attenuation of MTU injuries, but further randomized, controlled trials are needed to establish a higher level of evidence.

Since acute ballistic stretching (a type of DS involving a bouncing motion that moves the limb into an extended ROM (24)) can significantly increase tendon compliance (51), Witvrouw et al. (52) considered that ballistic stretching-induced reductions in tendon stiffness might ensure a high energy-absorbing capacity to store and release a large amount of elastic energy during subsequent, intense stretch-shortening cycle type activities. Therefore, they recommended ballistic stretching to prevent tendon injuries associated with intense stretch-shortening cycle activities. Additionally, a recent “expert consensus” statement (53) argued for the inclusion of pre-exercise ballistic stretching as part of an injury-prevention program for athletes. In contrast, other researchers (54,55) have recently stressed the importance of a higher tendon stiffness, particularly in relation to imbalances between muscle strength and tendon stiffness, for the prevention of tendon injuries. Arampatzis et al. (55) suggest that tendon deformation (i.e., strain) may be important from a functional performance perspective but that excessive deformation (compliance) could be related to tendon structural impairment. They suggest that there should be a significant association between and simultaneous training-related adaptations in muscle strength and tendon stiffness (54,55). However, while the tendon stiffness-tomuscle strength ratio of individual tendon fibers must be high, the role of overall tendon stiffness in the prevention of injury may also be related to the efficiency of sliding between collagen fibers and fascicles (56,57), which can provide a dissipation of forces over a greater distance and time. While individual MTU fibers must have sufficient stiffness to accommodate the high strains imposed during sprint running, jumping, and other activities, there is also a need for architectural adaptations and responses such as muscle and tendon fascicle rotation and translation (sliding). Therefore, a specific “stiffness” of the tendon may not be the critical factor influencing injury, and further research is required to understand the role of tendon stiffness and potential effects of muscle stretching on it.

With regard to specific evidence for or against the role of DS, no clear data are available. Ekstrand et al. (58) noted in 180 soccer players that “Hamstring strains were most common in teams not using special flexibility exercises for these muscles (t = 2.1)… but all stretching exercises were of the dynamic type and short duration…,” in reference to the stretching practices of players during warmup. Zakaria et al. (59) compared SS + DS with DS alone in high school soccer athletes and detected no difference in lower back and extremity injuries when implementing DS versus the SS + DS combination. However, they did not compare with a nonstretch control group, so the overall effect of stretching cannot be determined. Therefore, there is currently no clear evidence on which to draw conclusions as to the effects of DS on injury risk during warmup for sports or exercise.

SIDE BAR 2: UNIQUE RESEARCH FINDINGS ON STRETCHING
  1. Commonly reported static stretching (SS)-induced performance impairments are often due to inappropriate or invalid experimental protocols (1,2,3,22,24), including:

    • >60 seconds of SS per muscle group;

    • Lack of a full complement of warmup activities;

    • Testing or performing immediately after stretching when most sport activities commence 5 to 15 minutes poststretching;

    • Nocebo effects of using student subjects who have been instructed and expect to experience deficits with SS (self-fulfilling prophecy);

    • Reporting bias: statistically significant results are more likely to be published.

  2. SS can provide cardiovascular and stress health benefits (1621), including:

    • Reduced arterial stiffness,

    • Angiogenesis (increased blood vessel proli fer ation),

    • Improved vasodilation,

    • Greater parasympathetic influence,

    • Reduced chronic stress.

  3. SS can reduce musculotendinous injury incidence, especially in explosive and sprint activities but has trivial effects on all-cause injury risk (2,33,36,42, 43,44).

  4. Acute dynamic stretching may improve balance (73,79,80,82,83), while SS may either increase or decrease balance (not yet known under which conditions each outcome is likely).

Changes in MTU injury incidence in response to chronic stretching may be related to a shift in the active muscle force-length relationship (6062). As stretching shifts the active muscle length-tension relationship toward longer lengths (6062), force output is improved at those longer muscle lengths (6367). Ruan et al. (68) found that both the length of biceps femoris long head-to-knee torque relationship and biceps femoris long head-to-hip torque relationship during sprinting were shifted to the right after acute SS and thus hypothesized this shift could reduce the risk of hamstrings strain injury. Speculatively, for MTU injuries that occur at longer muscle lengths, the ability to generate force or absorb (or dissipate) energy at longer muscle lengths should decrease MTU injury risk. Furthermore, a more compliant MTU (6972) would have a greater capacity to absorb higher tensile forces (52). Science findings are rarely universal, as Barbosa et al. (73) reported contradictory results indicating that, after 3 stretching sessions per week for 10 weeks (3 sets of 30 seconds of SS), there was a significant 15.4% decrease in hamstrings eccentric peak torque, which could contribute to hamstrings strain injuries.

BOX 1: IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON INJURY INCIDENCE
  1. Pre-exercise muscle stretching typically does not influence all-cause injury risk.

  2. There is moderate evidence for greater protection from muscle-tendon unit (MTU) injuries with preexercise and chronic static stretching (SS); there is insufficient evidence for the effects of acute or chronic dynamic stretching (DS).

  3. Decreases in MTU injury incidence may result from changes in tissue compliance or shifts in the active force-length relation toward longer muscle lengths.

  4. There is no conclusive evidence for acute impairments in proprioception after static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.

A lack of proprioception (joint and muscle position sense) could adversely affect motor control (motor efferent responses to sensory afferent information) that may impair anticipatory and immediate responses to changes in the environment, leading to injuries. The literature examining the effect of acute SS on proprioception is equivocal, with contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching (3 × 5-second contraction followed by 20 seconds of stretch) of the shoulders (74) and SS (3 × 30 seconds) of knee extensors and flexors (75) showing no effect on respective joint position sense. However, using a similar duration of stretch (3 × 30 seconds) of the knee extensors and flexors, Ghaffarinejad et al. (76) reported improved knee joint position sense, and both SS (2 × 90 seconds) and DS (3 × 12 repetitions) of the quadriceps and hamstrings improved knee joint position sense in the study of Walsh (77). Hence, the lack of extensive literature on stretch-induced changes in proprioception does not permit a definite conclusion to be drawn, and thus, more research is needed in this area. Regardless, there appears to be no evidence of a decrement in proprioception after acute static or PNF stretching, so stretching may be used without consequence in this regard. However, the effects of chronic stretching on proprioception are yet to be defined.

In summary, while pre-exercise and chronic muscle stretching cannot be expected to decrease all-cause injuries (i.e., fractures, cartilaginous injuries, and joint inflammation, among many others), the literature does provide moderate evidence for greater protection from MTU injuries, which might speculatively result from alterations in tissue (muscle or tendon) compliance or shifts in the active force-length relation toward longer muscle lengths (see Side Bar 1). Additional randomized, controlled trials are required in sports and exercise populations to improve the level of evidence available.

Balance is essential for most activities of daily living, with static and dynamic balance deficits contributing to falls and related injuries especially in the elderly (78). Falls contribute to 95% of hip fractures in seniors (79) and are the most common cause of traumatic brain injury (80). Strategies to attenuate falls would not only improve health outcomes but also reduce health care costs (81).

There are conflicting reports regarding the acute effect of stretching on balance. Several measures of balance (static balance, increased center of pressure area, or postural sway) were impaired after either 1 repetition of 30 seconds (82), 3 repetitions of 45 seconds (28,83), 6 repetitions of 45 seconds (84), or 3 minutes (85) or 5 minutes (86) of SS, respectively. These results contrast with reported improved balance after a bilateral intermittent SS (5 repetitions of 1 minute, 15 seconds of rest) protocol (87). Seven minutes of DS (a controlled movement through the ROM of the active joint[s]) provided greater reductions in center of mass perturbations (i.e., stability/balance) during jumping (squat, countermovement, and drop jumps) tasks (88) as well as greater balance improvements on a dynamic stability platform (82) than 7 minutes of SS. There are also reports of similar small magnitude improvements in balance (Star Excursion Balance Test) after either 10- to 30-minute (15-second repetitions) of SS or DS (89). Costa et al. (90) reported that 2 × 45 seconds of SS had no adverse effects on balance (Biodex balance system involves a movable circular platform that can tilt 20°), whereas a 2 × 15-second SS protocol evoked a significant improvement. Furthermore, Handrakis et al. (91) and Nelson et al. (92) reported improved dynamic balance (single leg balance on a Balance System SD movable platform) and postural sway (time to maintain a stabilometer horizontal over two 30-second periods) after 10 and 20 minutes of total SS, respectively. Alternatively, contract-relax PNF stretching has been reported to improve dynamic balance on a Biodex balance system and stabilometric platform (93,94) as well as impair dynamic balance on a stabilometric platform (95). With the literature demonstrating similar numbers of SS articles reporting either improved or impaired balance with SS, more research is necessary to ascertain whether SS is more likely to be beneficial or detrimental to balance and under which conditions it might have these different effects. Alternatively, as the 3 DS articles all report positive effects on balance, DS may be a more reliable recommendation.

A major limitation of the stretch and balance research is the implementation of unrealistic stretching durations in many studies (13,26) (see Side Bar 2). While the average stretch durations of American professional and collegiate athletes are 12–30 seconds per muscle group (96104) and most guidelines suggest several (24) repetitions of 15- to 30-second stretches, stretches in many studies are often imposed for several minutes or even up to 20 to 30 minutes per muscle group (105,106). Reviews of the literature have demonstrated that less than 60 seconds of SS results in trivial effects on subsequent performance, especially when incorporated into a full warmup that included prior aerobic activity and poststretch dynamic activities (13,24,26). However, in relation to balance measures, both improvements (90) and impairments (82) have been observed with 30 seconds of SS. Furthermore, balance deficits were reported after 135 seconds (28) of quadriceps, hamstrings, and plantar flexor (PF) stretching (28,83) as well as 270 seconds (84), 3 minutes (85), and 5 minutes (86) of PF SS. Nonetheless, enhancement of balance was also reported after 5 minutes (87) and 10 minutes (91) of low back, hip and knee extensors, and knee flexors, and 20 minutes (92) of hip, knee, and ankle joints of total SS. Thus, the recommended maximum of 60 seconds of SS per muscle group for trivial strength, power, sprint, and other performance impairments is not a consistent parameter for balance impairments or enhancements. While most studies reported PF stretching to have both negative and positive consequences, there were also both impairments and improvements when stretching multiple lower body muscle groups. All these studies examined the effects in either young adults or adolescents, so it is unclear whether the findings are relevant to older adults. The results of balance tests did not reveal a sex-dependent trend, with most studies including both men and women and only 2 studies involving only women (82,90) and 1 study only men (85). With such diversity of results, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the benefits or costs of acute bouts of muscle SS or DS on balance performance, especially in balance-impaired older individuals where a paucity of research exists. Hence, additional research is needed to clarify the effect of different types, volumes, and intensity of stretching on balance.

Reported balance deficits after acute stretching might be related to its effects on proprioception, so it is worth briefly examining this possibility. Recent evidence suggests that longer periods of intermittent SS (5 × 60-second PF stretches) might acutely reduce activity in spinocerebellar pathways (107), which might be expected to influence balance and stability. However, whereas ankle motion sense (proprioception) has been shown to be impaired after 6 × 40-second SS (108), no significant effect on knee joint position sense was detected after 3 × 30-second SS (75), contrasting with improved knee joint proprioception also after 3 × 30 seconds of SS (76). The ability to react to perturbations affecting stability and balance would not only be regulated by vestibular and proprioceptive afferent and efferent responses (109,110), but the musculotendinous system would also need to react with sufficient force and speed to overcome the perturbation and return the center of gravity to within the base of support (metastability (111)). Acute bouts of SS have been reported to reduce passive MTU stiffness within the knee flexors and extensors and PF (112). In a more compliant system, greater shortening of the contractile element is required to stretch the series elastic components to increase overall MTU stiffness and thus for an external force (joint torque) to be exerted. However, when interpreting the literature, it is important to differentiate between passive and active muscle stiffness (stiffness properties measured during dynamic muscle contractions). Factors affecting passive MTU stiffness do not substantially influence maximal voluntary muscle force output (1). Active and passive muscle stiffness are not related when measured in ex vivo experiments (113) and when measured in the PF (114,115) or knee flexors (116). Furthermore, reductions in passive MTU stiffness are reported without modifications in active stiffness after a bout of static PF stretching (117). Thus, whereas stretch-induced reductions in passive MTU stiffness can occur, it is unlikely that a concomitant reduction would occur in active MTU stiffness. Another contributing factor to active MTU stiffness would be the role of cocontractions during an erect stance to modulate or maintain the active stiffness of the joint(s) (118). Hence, increased passive compliance may not play a substantive disruptive role in balance, and the effects of stretching on active muscle stiffness during balance tasks have yet to be studied.

BOX 2: IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON BALANCE
  1. DS is demonstrated to have acute beneficial effects on balance.

  2. The effects of acute SS on balance are equivocal; it is not yet possible to determine the circumstances under which effects may be positive, absent, or negative.

  3. Chronic dynamic and static stretch training may provide balance benefits and thus help to reduce the incidence of falls.

  4. Mechanisms underlying these benefits may include increased MTU compliance or range of motion allowing the individual to accommodate greater disruptive perturbations.

  5. Acute and chronic stretch-induced increases in force production at longer muscle lengths (altered muscle force-length relationship) may contribute to a stronger and more rapid reaction to balance perturbations from an extended joint or leg position.

An alternative viewpoint might be that a more compliant system would be better able to absorb disruptive perturbations (52), attenuating center of mass translocations and increasing the chance that the body's center of mass would remain within the base of support (i.e., enhanced metastability or balance). A more compliant MTU system (i.e., less stiff), which could absorb the disruptive perturbation over a prolonged duration, could permit greater sensory (afferent) feedback and efferent postural adjustments. In retrospect, individuals may need a proportionality between stiffness and compliance. A stiffer MTU might permit a rapid force-dependent reaction to balance perturbations, whereas an appropriate degree of MTU compliance might allow absorption of energy produced during perturbation to allow the center of mass to remain within the base of support (i.e., a “Goldilocks zone” (3)). While the few DS studies show balance improvements, SS studies demonstrating deficits (conflicting with those similar numbers of SS studies that show improvements or no change) might be attributed to nonpractical choices within their experimental protocols or to possible adverse effects on proprioception. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of changes in active and passive MTU stiffness.

Another important question to ask is whether chronic stretch training provides an overall benefit to balance capacity. Few studies have examined the effect of stretch training on balance. SS training 4 days per week for 6 weeks of university-aged males improved static balance time (unilateral stance on forefoot with eyes open), while there was a non-significant (P = 0.078) improvement after PNF stretching (119). Also, a 10-week SS training program of 5 lower extremity muscles (2 days per week: 3 × 30 seconds) in high school students improved unilateral stance on a balance beam (1-minute flamingo balance test with dominant leg). The possible improvements in balance with stretch training might be partially attributed to the prolongation of disruptive torques by a more compliant system, allowing the neuromuscular system more time to adjust and react to these perturbations. Moreover, an augmented ROM may allow an individual to extend farther and closer to the limit of their base of support and return without losing their balance (improved metastability). For example, Hoch et al. (120) reported that an individual's maximum dorsiflexion ROM explained a significant proportion of the variance in anterior reach distance in the Star Excursion Balance Test. In addition, when losing balance or falling, an individual may need to reach out with an extended leg beyond the optimum point on their muscle force-length relationship. With stretching, the active length-tension relationship is shifted toward longer muscle lengths (6062), with force reductions at short muscle lengths contrasting with moderate improvements at longer muscle lengths (6367). Thus, after a stretch training program in which ROM and force capacity at long muscle lengths are increased, an individual who is falling may be able to move a limb further to increase their base of support and react more forcefully while landing in an extended and unbalanced position. Nonetheless, this specific hypothesis remains to be explicitly tested.

In summary, while the effects on balance of an acute bout of DS may be beneficial and the effects of SS equivocal, chronic stretch training may provide benefits and help to reduce the incidence of falls and thus the associated injuries and negative health consequences (see Side Bar 2). The mechanisms underlying these benefits may be related to an increased MTU compliance or ROM allowing the individual to accommodate greater disruptive perturbations and deviations from their base of support and then to react more forcefully from an extended joint position (due to altered muscle force-length relationship) when balance is disrupted.

Boxes 1 and 2 provide brief important information emphasized in this review. In summary, there is little evidence that pre-exercise stretching (of either static or dynamic type) decreases all-cause injury risk, but there is stronger evidence for a static stretch-induced reduction in musculotendinous injuries, particularly in running-based sports (Figure 1). However, additional randomized, controlled trials in sports and exercising populations (including elderly, clinical, and others) are required to provide a higher level of evidence. Nonetheless, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a recommendation for the role of acute or chronic DS on injury risk. While the effect of an acute bout of SS on balance is equivocal, chronic static stretch training may provide balance benefits, which may then contribute to a reduction in the incidence of falls and associated injuries (Figure 1). In addition, DS generally shows favorable effects upon balance and should be incorporated into acute and chronic stretch training programs. Mechanisms underlying these benefits may include an increased musculotendinous compliance and ROM, allowing an individual to accommodate and respond more efficiently to balance threats. However, adaptations within sensory (e.g., spinothalamic) pathways cannot be ruled out. In conclusion, while acute (e.g., pre-exercise) static muscle stretching may provide a small reduction specifically in muscle and musculotendinous injury risks, particularly in running-based sports, chronic stretching training appears to have a moderate impact on muscle injury risk and both standing and walking balance and can therefore be recommended as part of a holistic clinical program. There is no evidence of the effect of DS (either pre-exercise or chronic) on injury risk, but its use may provide an acute benefit to balance performance and thus may influence fall risk.

FIGURE 1.

Summary figure. SS = static stretching; MTU = muscle-tendon unit.

FIGURE 1.

Summary figure. SS = static stretching; MTU = muscle-tendon unit.

Close modal

Conflict of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors declare no conflict of interest with the contents of this manuscript. Partial funding was provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (#20172544).

1.
Behm
 
DG,
Kay
 
AD,
Trajano
 
GS,
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Mechanisms underlying performance impairments following prolonged static stretching without a comprehensive warm-up
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
.
2020
;
121
(
1
):
67
94
.
doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04538-8
2.
Behm
 
DG,
Blazevich
 
AJ,
Kay
 
AD,
McHugh
 
M.
Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review
.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab
.
2016
;
41
(
1
):
1
11
.
3.
Behm
 
DG.
The Science and Physiology of Flexibility and Stretching: Implications and Applications in Sport Performance and Health
.
London, UK.
:
Routledge Publishers
;
2018
.
100
pp.
4.
Decoster
 
LC.
Effects of hamstring stretching on range of motion: a systematic review updated
.
Athl Train Sports Health Care
.
2009
;
1
(
5
):
209
13
.
5.
Radford
 
JA,
Burns
 
J,
Buchbinder
 
R,
Landorf
 
KB,
Cook
 
C.
Does stretching increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion? A systematic review
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2006
;
40
(
10
):
870
5
.
6.
Behm
 
DG,
Alizadeh
 
S,
Anvar
 
SH,
Drury
 
B,
Granacher
 
U,
Moran
 
J.
Non-local acute passive stretching effects on range of motion in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis
.
Sports Med
.
2021
;
51
(
5
):
945
59
.
doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01422-5
7.
Emilio
 
EJ,
Hita-Contreras
 
F,
Jimenez-Lara
 
PM,
Latorre-Roman
 
P,
Martinez-Amat
 
A.
The association of flexibility, balance, and lumbar strength with balance ability: risk of falls in older adults
.
J Sports Sci Med
.
2014
;
13
(
2
):
349
57
.
8.
Christiansen
 
CL.
The effects of hip and ankle stretching on gait function of older people
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
.
2008
;
89
(
8
):
1421
8
.
9.
Gonzalez-Rave
 
JM,
Sanchez-Gomez
 
A,
Santos-Garcia
 
DJ.
Efficacy of two different stretch training programs (passive vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) on shoulder and hip range of motion in older people
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2012
;
26
(
4
):
1045
51
.
10.
Borg
 
TK,
Caulfield
 
JB.
Morphology of connective tissue in skeletal muscle
.
Tissue Cell
.
1980
;
12
(
1
):
197
207
.
11.
Purslow
 
PP.
Strain-induced reorientation of an intramuscular connective tissue network: implications for passive muscle elasticity
.
J Biomech
.
1989
;
22
(
1
):
21
31
.
12.
Williams
 
PE,
Goldspink
 
G.
Connective tissue changes in immobilised muscle
.
J Anat
.
1984
;
138
(
Pt 2
):
343
50
.
13.
Fusi
 
L,
Reconditi
 
M,
Linari
 
M,
Brunello
 
E,
Elangovan
 
R,
Lombardi
 
V,
Piazzesi
 
G.
The mechanism of the resistance to stretch of isometrically contracting single muscle fibres
.
J Physiol
.
2010
;
588
(
Pt 3
):
495
510
.
14.
Bartoo
 
ML,
Linke
 
WA,
Pollack
 
GH.
Basis of passive tension and stiffness in isolated rabbit myofibrils
.
Am J Physiol
.
1997
;
273
(
1 Pt 1
):
C266
76
.
15.
Granzier
 
HL,
Wang
 
K.
Passive tension and stiffness of vertebrate skeletal and insect flight muscles: the contribution of weak cross-bridges and elastic filaments
.
Biophys J
.
1993
;
65
(
5
):
2141
59
.
16.
Kay
 
AD,
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Reductions in active plantar flexor moment are significantly correlated with static stretch duration
.
Eur J Sport Sci
.
2008
;
8
(
1
):
41
6
.
17.
Kay
 
AD,
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Moderate-duration static stretch reduces active and passive plantar flexor moment but not Achilles tendon stiffness or active muscle length
.
J Appl Physiol
.
2009
;
106
(
4
):
1249
56
.
18.
Thomas
 
E,
Bellafiore
 
M,
Gentile
 
A,
Paoli
 
A,
Palma
 
A,
Bianco
 
A.
Cardiovascular responses to muscle stretching: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Int J Sports Med
.
2021
;
42
(
6
):
481
93
.
doi:10.1055/a-1312-7131
19.
Bisconti
 
AV,
Ce
 
E,
Longo
 
S,
Venturelli
 
M,
Coratella
 
G,
Limonta
 
E,
Doria
 
C,
Rampichini
 
S,
Esposito
 
F.
Evidence for improved systemic and local vascular function after long-term passive static stretching training of the musculoskeletal system
.
J Physiol
.
2020
;
598
(
17
):
3645
66
.
20.
Yamamoto
 
K,
Kawano
 
H,
Gando
 
Y,
Iemitsu
 
M,
Murakami
 
H,
Sanada
 
K,
Tanimoto
 
M,
Ohmori
 
Y,
Higuchi
 
M,
Tabata
 
I,
Miyachi
 
M.
Poor trunk flexibility is associated with arterial stiffening
.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
.
2009
;
297
(
4
):
H1314
8
.
21.
Hotta
 
K,
Behnke
 
BJ,
Arjmandi
 
B,
Ghosh
 
P,
Chen
 
B,
Brooks
 
R,
Maraj
 
J,
Elam
 
M,
Maher
 
P,
Kurien
 
D,
Churchill
 
A,
Sepulveda
 
J,
Kabolowsky
 
M,
Christou
 
D,
Muller-Delp
 
J.
Daily muscle stretching enhances blood flow, endothelial function, capillarity, vascular volume and connectivity in aged skeletal muscle
.
J Physiol
.
2018
;
596
(
10
):
1903
17
.
22.
Inami
 
T,
Shimizu
 
T,
Baba
 
R,
Nakagaki,
 
A.
Acute changes in autonomic nerve activity during passive static stretching
.
Amer J Sports Sci Med
.
2014
;
2
(
4
):
166
70
.
23.
Corey
 
SM,
Epel
 
E,
Schembri
 
M,
Pawlowsky
 
SB,
Cole
 
RJ,
Araneta
 
MR,
Barrett-Connor
 
E,
Kanaya
 
AM.
Effect of restorative yoga vs. stretching on diurnal cortisol dynamics and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with the metabolic syndrome: the PRYSMS randomized controlled trial
.
Psychoneuroendocrinol
.
2014
;
49
:
260
71
.
24.
Behm
 
DG,
Chaouachi
 
A.
A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
.
2011
;
111
(
11
):
2633
51
.
25.
Chaabene
 
H,
Behm
 
DG,
Negra
 
Y,
Granacher
 
U.
Acute effects of static stretching on muscle strength and power: an attempt to clarify previous caveats
.
Front Physiol
.
2019
;
10
:
1468
.
26.
Kay
 
AD,
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Effect of acute static stretch on maximal muscle performance: a systematic review
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2012
;
44
(
1
):
154
64
.
27.
Cronin
 
J,
Nash
 
M,
Whatman
 
C.
The acute effects of hamstring stretching and vibration on dynamic knee joint range of motion and jump performance
.
Phys Ther Sport
.
2008
;
9
(
2
):
89
96
.
28.
Behm
 
DG,
Bambury
 
A,
Cahill
 
F,
Power
 
K.
Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2004
;
36
(
8
):
1397
402
.
29.
Blazevich
 
AJ,
Gill
 
ND,
Kvorning
 
T,
Kay
 
AD,
Goh
 
AG,
Hilton
 
B,
Drinkwater
 
EJ,
Behm
 
DG.
No effect of muscle stretching within a full, dynamic warm-up on athletic performance
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2018
;
50
(
6
):
1258
66
.
30.
Murphy
 
JR,
Di Santo
 
MC,
Alkanani
 
T,
Behm
 
DG.
Aerobic activity before and following short-duration static stretching improves range of motion and performance vs. a traditional warm-up
.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab
.
2010
;
35
(
5
):
679
90
.
31.
Reid
 
JC,
Greene
 
R,
Young
 
JD,
Hodgson
 
DD,
Blazevich
 
AJ,
Behm
 
DG.
The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
.
2018
;
118
(
7
):
1427
45
.
32.
Samson
 
M,
Button
 
DC,
Chaouachi
 
A,
Behm
 
DG.
Effects of dynamic and static stretching within general and activity specific warm-up protocols
.
J Sports Sci Med
.
2012
;
11
(
2
):
279
85
.
33.
Baxter
 
C,
Mc Naughton
 
LR,
Sparks
 
A,
Norton
 
L,
Bentley
 
D.
Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners
.
Res Sports Med
.
2017
;
25
(
1
):
78
90
.
34.
Fradkin
 
AJ,
Gabbe
 
BJ,
Cameron
 
PA.
Does warming up prevent injury in sport? The evidence from randomised controlled trials?
J Sci Med Sport.
2006
;
9
(
3
):
214
20
.
35.
Small
 
K,
McNaughton
 
NL,
Matthews
 
M.
A systematic review into the efficacy of static stretching as part of a warm-up for the prevention of exercise-related injury
.
Res Sports Med
.
2008
;
16
(
3
):
213
31
.
36.
Weldon
 
SM,
Hill
 
RH.
The efficacy of stretching for prevention of exercise-related injury: a systematic review of the literature
.
Man Ther
.
2003
;
8
(
3
):
141
50
.
37.
Weppler
 
CH,
Magnusson
 
SP.
Increasing muscle extensibility: a matter of increasing length or modifying sensation?
Phys Ther.
2010
;
90
(
3
):
438
49
.
38.
Witvrouw
 
E,
Mahieu
 
N,
Danneels
 
L,
McNair
 
P.
Stretching and injury prevention: an obscure relationship
.
Sports Med
.
2004
;
34
(
7
):
443
9
.
39.
Pope
 
R,
Herbert
 
R,
Kirwan
 
J.
Effects of ankle dorsiflexion range and pre-exercise calf muscle stretching on injury risk in army recruits
.
Australian Physiother
.
1998
;
44
(
3
):
165
77
.
40.
de la Motte
 
SJ,
Lisman
 
P,
Gribbin
 
TC,
Murphy
 
K,
Deuster
 
PA.
Systematic review of the association between physical fitness and musculoskeletal injury risk: Part 3—flexibility, power, speed, balance, and agility
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2019
;
33
(
6
):
1723
35
.
41.
Pope
 
R,
Herbert
 
R,
Kirwan
 
J,
Graham
 
B.
A randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2000
;
32
(
2
):
271
7
.
42.
Shrier
 
I.
Does stretching improve performance? A systematic and critical review of the literature
.
Clin J Sport Med
.
2004
;
14
(
5
):
267
73
.
43.
Amako
 
M,
Oda
 
T,
Masuoka
 
K,
Yokoi
 
H,
Campisi
 
P.
Effect of static stretching on prevention of injuries for military recruits
.
Mil Med
.
2003
;
168
(
6
):
442
6
.
44.
Jamtvedt
 
G,
Herbert
 
RD,
Flottorp
 
S,
Odgaard-Jensen
 
J,
Havelsrud
 
K,
Barratt
 
A,
Mathieu
 
E,
Burls
 
A,
Oxman
 
AD.
A pragmatic randomised trial of stretching before and after physical activity to prevent injury and soreness
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2010
;
44
(
14
):
1002
9
.
45.
Woods
 
K,
Bishop
 
P,
Jones
 
E.
Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury
.
Sports Med
.
2007
;
37
(
12
):
1089
99
.
46.
Azuma
 
N,
Someya
 
F.
Injury prevention effects of stretching exercise intervention by physical therapists in male high school soccer players
.
Scand J Med Sci Sports
.
2020
;
30
(
11
):
2178
92
.
47.
McHugh
 
MP,
Cosgrave
 
CH.
To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance
.
Scand J Med Sci Sports
.
2010
;
20
(
2
):
169
81
.
48.
McKay
 
GD,
Goldie
 
PA,
Payne
 
WR,
Oakes
 
BW.
Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2001
;
35
(
2
):
103
8
.
49.
Dadebo
 
B,
White
 
J,
George
 
KP.
A survey of flexibility training protocols and hamstring strains in professional football clubs in England
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2004
;
38
(
4
):
388
94
.
50.
Cross
 
K,
Worrell
 
T.
Effects of a static stretching program on the incidence of lower extremity musculotendinous strains
.
J Athl Train
.
1999
;
34
(
1
):
11
4
.
51.
Mahieu
 
NN,
McNair
 
P,
De
 
MM,
Stevens
 
V,
Blanckaert
 
I,
Smits
 
N,
Witvrouw
 
E.
Effect of static and ballistic stretching on the muscle-tendon tissue properties
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2007
;
39
(
3
):
494
501
.
52.
Witvrouw
 
E,
Mahieu
 
N,
Roosen
 
P,
McNair
 
P.
The role of stretching in tendon injuries
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2007
;
41
(
4
):
224
6
.
53.
Donaldson
 
A,
Cook
 
J,
Gabbe
 
B,
Lloyd
 
DG,
Young
 
W,
Finch
 
CF.
Bridging the gap between content and context: establishing expert consensus on the content of an exercise training program to prevent lower-limb injuries
.
Clin J Sport Med
.
2015
;
25
(
3
):
221
9
.
54.
Mersmann
 
F,
Bohm
 
S,
Arampatzis
 
A.
Imbalances in the development of muscle and tendon as risk factor for tendinopathies in youth athletes: a review of current evidence and concepts of prevention
.
Front Physiol
.
2017
;
8
:
987
.
55.
Arampatzis
 
A,
Mersmann
 
F,
Bohm
 
S.
Individualized muscle-tendon assessment and training
.
Front Physiol
.
2020
;
11
:
723
.
56.
Thorpe
 
CT,
Udeze
 
CP,
Birch
 
HL,
Clegg
 
PD,
Screen
 
HR.
Capacity for sliding between tendon fascicles decreases with ageing in injury prone equine tendons: a possible mechanism for age-related tendinopathy?
Eur Cell Mater.
2013
;
25
:
48
60
.
57.
Thorpe
 
CT,
Godinho
 
MSC,
Riley
 
GP,
Birch
 
HL,
Clegg
 
PD,
Screen
 
HRC.
The interfascicular matrix enables fascicle sliding and recovery in tendon, and behaves more elastically in energy storing tendons
.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
.
2015
;
52
:
85
94
.
58.
Ekstrand
 
J,
Gillquist
 
J,
Moller
 
M,
Oberg
 
B,
Liljedahl
 
SO.
Incidence of soccer injuries and their relation to training and team success
.
Am J Sports Med
.
1983
;
11
(
2
):
63
7
.
59.
Zakaria
 
AA,
Kiningham
 
RB,
Sen
 
A.
Effects of static and dynamic stretching on injury prevention in high school soccer athletes: a randomized trial
.
J Sport Rehabil
.
2015
;
24
(
3
):
229
35
.
60.
Cramer
 
JT,
Beck
 
TW,
Housh
 
TJ,
Massey
 
LL,
Marek
 
SM,
Danglemeier
 
S,
Purkayastha
 
S,
Culbertson
 
JY,
Fitz
 
KA,
Egan
 
AD.
Acute effects of static stretching on characteristics of the isokinetic angle-torque relationship, surface electromyography, and mechanomyography
.
J Sports Sci
.
2007
;
25
(
6
):
687
98
.
61.
Takeuchi
 
K,
Nakamura
 
M.
Influence of high intensity 20-second static stretching on the flexibility and strength of hamstrings
.
J Sports Sci Med
.
2020
;
19
(
2
):
429
35
.
62.
Weir
 
DE,
Tingley
 
J,
Elder
 
GCB.
Acute passive stretching alters the mechanical properties of human plantar flexors and the optimal angle for maximal voluntary contraction
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
.
2005
;
93
(
5–6
):
614
23
.
63.
Balle
 
SS,
Magnusson
 
SP,
McHugh
 
MP.
Effects of contract-relax vs static stretching on stretch-induced strength loss and length-tension relationship
.
Scand J Med Sci Sports
.
2015
;
25
(
6
):
764
9
.
64.
Herda
 
TJ,
Cramer
 
JT,
Ryan
 
ED,
McHugh
 
MP,
Stout
 
JR.
Acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on isometric peak torque, electromyography, and mechanomyography of the biceps femoris muscle
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2008
;
22
(
3
):
809
17
.
65.
McHugh
 
MP,
Nesse
 
M.
Effect of stretching on strength loss and pain after eccentric exercise
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2008
;
40
(
3
):
566
73
.
66.
McHugh
 
MP,
Tallent
 
J,
Johnson
 
CD.
The role of neural tension in stretch-induced strength loss
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2013
;
27
(
5
):
1327
32
.
67.
Nelson
 
AG,
Allen
 
JD,
Cornwell
 
A,
Kokkonen
 
J.
Inhibition of maximal voluntary isometric torque production by acute stretching is joint-angle specific
.
Res Q Exerc Sport
.
2001
;
72
(
1
):
68
70
.
68.
Ruan
 
M,
Li
 
L,
Chen
 
C,
Wu
 
X.
Stretch could reduce hamstring injury risk during sprinting by right shifting the length-torque curve
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2018
;
32
(
8
):
2190
8
.
69.
Bouvier
 
T,
Opplert
 
J,
Cometti
 
C,
Babault
 
N.
Acute effects of static stretching on muscle-tendon mechanics of quadriceps and plantar flexor muscles
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
.
2017
;
117
(
7
):
1309
15
.
70.
Konrad
 
A,
Reiner
 
MM,
Thaller
 
S,
Tilp
 
M.
The time course of muscle-tendon properties and function responses of a five-minute static stretching exercise
.
Eur J Sport Sci
.
2019
;
19
(
9
):
1195
203
.
71.
Longo
 
S,
Ce
 
E,
Rampichini
 
S,
Devoto
 
M,
Venturelli
 
M,
Limonta
 
E,
Esposito
 
F.
Correlation between stiffness and electromechanical delay components during muscle contraction and relaxation before and after static stretching
.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol
.
2017
;
33
:
83
93
.
72.
Opplert
 
J,
Genty
 
JB,
Babault
 
N.
Do stretch durations affect muscle mechanical and neurophysiological properties?
Int J Sports Med.
2016
;
37
(
9
):
673
9
.
73.
Barbosa
 
GM,
Trajano
 
GS,
Dantas
 
GAF,
Silva
 
BR,
Vieira
 
WHB.
Chronic effects of static and dynamic stretching on hamstrings eccentric strength and functional performance: a randomized controlled trial
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2020
;
34
(
7
):
2031
9
.
74.
Bjorklund
 
M,
Djupsjobacka
 
M,
Crenshaw
 
AG.
Acute muscle stretching and shoulder position sense
.
J Athl Train
.
2006
;
41
(
3
):
270
4
.
75.
Larsen
 
R,
Lund
 
H,
Christensen
 
R,
Rogind
 
H,
nneskiold-Samsoe
 
B,
Bliddal
 
H.
Effect of static stretching of quadriceps and hamstring muscles on knee joint position sense
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2005
;
39
(
1
):
43
6
.
76.
Ghaffarinejad
 
F,
Taghizadeh
 
S,
Mohammadi
 
F.
Effect of static stretching of muscles surrounding the knee on knee joint position sense
.
Br J Sports Med
.
2007
;
41
(
10
):
684
7
.
77.
Walsh
 
GS.
Effect of static and dynamic muscle stretching as part of warm up procedures on knee joint proprioception and strength
.
Hum Mov Sci
.
2017
;
55
:
189
95
.
78.
Bergen
 
G,
Stevens
 
MR,
Burns
 
ER.
Falls and fall injuries among adults aged ≥65 years—United States, 2014
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
.
2016
;
65
(
37
):
993
8
.
79.
Hayes
 
WC,
Myers
 
ER,
Morris
 
JN,
Gerhart
 
TN,
Yett
 
HS,
Lipsitz
 
LA.
Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall
.
Calcif Tissue Int
.
1993
;
52
(
3
):
192
8
.
80.
Jager
 
TE,
Weiss
 
HB,
Coben
 
JH,
Pepe
 
PE.
Traumatic brain injuries evaluated in U.S. emergency departments, 1992–1994
.
Acad Emerg Med
.
2000
;
7
(
2
):
134
40
.
81.
Florence
 
CS,
Bergen
 
G,
Atherly
 
A,
Burns
 
E,
Stevens
 
J,
Drake
 
C.
Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
.
2018
;
66
(
4
):
693
8
.
82.
Chatzopoulos
 
D,
Galazoulas
 
C,
Patikas
 
D,
Kotzamanidis
 
C.
Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on balance, agility, reaction time and movement time
.
J Sports Sci Med
.
2014
;
13
(
2
):
403
9
.
83.
Hemmati
 
L,
Rojhani-Shirazi
 
Z,
Ebrahimi
 
S.
Effects of plantar flexor muscle static stretching alone and combined with massage on postural balance
.
Ann Rehabil Med
.
2016
;
40
(
5
):
845
50
.
84.
Lima
 
BN,
Lucareli
 
PR,
Gomes
 
WA,
Silva
 
JJ,
Bley
 
AS,
Hartigan
 
EH,
Marchetti
 
PH.
The acute effects of unilateral ankle plantar flexors static- stretching on postural sway and gastrocnemius muscle activity during single-leg balance tasks
.
J Sports Sci Med
.
2014
;
13
(
3
):
564
70
.
85.
Nagano
 
A,
Yoshioka
 
S,
Hay
 
DC,
Himeno
 
R,
Fukashiro
 
S.
Influence of vision and static stretch of the calf muscles on postural sway during quiet standing
.
Hum Mov Sci
.
2006
;
25
(
3
):
422
34
.
86.
Han
 
MJ,
Yuk
 
GC,
Gak
 
H,
Suh
 
SR,
Kim
 
SG.
Acute effects of 5 min of plantar flexor static stretching on balance and gait in the elderly
.
J Phys Ther Sci
.
2014
;
26
(
1
):
131
3
.
87.
Martinez-Jimenez
 
EM,
Losa-Iglesias
 
ME,
Diaz-Velazquez
 
JI,
Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo
 
R,
Palomo-Lopez
 
P,
Calvo-Lobo
 
C,
Lopez-Lopez
 
D,
Rodriguez-Sanz
 
D.
Acute effects of intermittent versus continuous bilateral ankle plantar flexor static stretching on postural sway and plantar pressures: a randomized clinical trial
.
J Clin Med
.
2019
;
8
(
1
).
doi:10.3390/jcm8010052
88.
Fletcher
 
IM.
The effect of different dynamic stretch velocities on jump performance
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
.
2010
;
109
(
3
):
491
8
.
89.
Belkhiria-Turki
 
L,
Chaouachi
 
A,
Turki
 
O,
Hammami
 
R,
Chtara
 
M,
Amri
 
M,
Drinkwater
 
EJ,
Behm
 
DG.
Greater volumes of static and dynamic stretching within a warm-up do not impair star excursion balance performance
.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness
.
2014
;
54
(
3
):
279
88
.
90.
Costa
 
PB,
Graves
 
BS,
Whitehurst
 
M,
Jacobs
 
PL.
The acute effects of different durations of static stretching on dynamic balance performance
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2009
;
23
(
1
):
141
7
.
91.
Handrakis
 
JP,
Southard
 
VN,
Abreu
 
JM,
Aloisa
 
M,
Doyen
 
MR,
Echevarria
 
LM,
Hwang
 
H,
Samuels
 
C,
Venegas
 
SA,
Douris
 
PC.
Static stretching does not impair performance in active middle-aged adults
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2010
;
24
(
3
):
825
30
.
92.
Nelson
 
AG,
Kokkonen
 
J,
Arnall
 
DA,
Li
 
L.
Acute stretching increases postural stability in nonbalance trained individuals
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2012
;
26
(
11
):
3095
100
.
93.
Szafraniec
 
R,
Chromik
 
K,
Poborska
 
A,
Kawczynski
 
A.
Acute effects of contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching of hip abductors and adductors on dynamic balance
.
Peer J
.
2018
;
6
:
e6108
.
doi:10.7717/peerj.6108
94.
Ryan
 
EE,
Rossi
 
MD,
Lopez
 
R.
The effects of the contract-relax-antagonist-contract form of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on postural stability
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2010
;
24
(
7
):
1888
94
.
95.
Ghram
 
A,
Damak
 
M,
Costa
 
PB.
Effect of acute contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on static balance in healthy men
.
Sci Sports
.
2017
;
32
:
e1
7
.
96.
Ebben
 
WP,
Hintz
 
MJ,
Simenz
 
CJ.
Strength and conditioning practices of Major League Baseball strength and conditioning coaches
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2005
;
19
(
3
):
538
46
.
97.
Ebben
 
WP,
Carroll
 
RM,
Simenz
 
CJ.
Strength and conditioning practices of National Hockey League strength and conditioning coaches
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2004
;
18
(
4
):
889
97
.
98.
Ebben
 
WP,
Blackard
 
DO.
Strength and conditioning practices of National Football League strength and conditioning coaches
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2001
;
15
(
1
):
48
58
.
99.
Judge
 
LW,
Avedesian
 
JM,
Bellar,
 
DM,
Hoover
 
DL,
Craig
 
BW,
Langley
 
J,
Nordmann
 
N,
Schoeff
 
MA,
Dickin
 
C.
Pre- and post-activity stretching practices of collegiate soccer coaches in the United States
.
Int J Exerc Sci
.
2020
;
13
(
6
):
260
72
.
100.
Judge
 
LW,
Petersen
 
JC,
Bellar
 
DM,
Craig
 
BW,
Wanless
 
EA,
Benner
 
M,
Simon
 
LS.
An examination of pre-activity and post-activity stretching practices of crosscountry and track and field distance coaches
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2013
;
27
(
9
):
2456
64
.
101.
Judge
 
LW,
Craig
 
B,
Baudendistal
 
S,
Bodey
 
KJ.
An examination of the stretching practices of Division I and Division III college football programs in the midwestern United States
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2009
;
23
(
4
):
1091
6
.
102.
Judge
 
LW,
Bellar
 
DM,
Gilreath
 
EL,
Petersen
 
JC,
Craig
 
BW,
Popp
 
JK,
Hindawi
 
OS,
Simon
 
LS.
An examination of preactivity and post-activity stretching practices of NCAA division I, NCAA division II, and NCAA division III track and field throws programs
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2013
;
27
(
10
):
2691
9
.
103.
Judge
 
LW,
Bellar
 
D,
Craig
 
B,
Petersen
 
J,
Camerota
 
J,
Wanless
 
E,
Bodey
 
K.
An examination of pre-activity and post-activity flexibility practices of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I tennis coaches
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2012
;
26
(
1
):
184
91
.
104.
Simenz
 
CJ,
Dugan
 
CA,
Ebben
 
WP.
Strength and conditioning practices of National Basketball Association strength and conditioning coaches
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2005
;
19
(
3
):
495
504
.
105.
Behm
 
DG,
Button
 
DC,
Butt
 
JC.
Factors affecting force loss with prolonged stretching
.
Can J Appl Physiol
.
2001
;
26
(
3
):
261
72
.
106.
Fowles
 
JR,
Sale
 
DG,
MacDougall
 
JD.
Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantar flexors
.
J Appl Physiol
.
2000
;
89
(
3
):
1179
88
.
107.
Pulverenti
 
TS,
Trajano
 
GS,
Kirk
 
BJC,
Bochkezanian
 
V,
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Plantar flexor muscle stretching depresses the soleus late response but not tendon tap reflexes
.
Eur J Neurosci
.
2021
;
53
(
9
):
3185
3198
.
doi:10.1111/ejn.15178
108.
Smajla
 
D,
Garcia-Ramos
 
A,
Tomazin
 
K,
Strojnik
 
V.
Selective effect of static stretching, concentric contractions, and a one-leg balance task on ankle motion sense in young and older adults
.
Gait Posture
.
2019
;
71
:
1
6
.
109.
Behm
 
DG,
Anderson
 
KG.
The role of instability with resistance training
.
J Strength Cond Res
.
2006
;
20
(
3
):
716
22
.
110.
Anderson
 
K,
Behm
 
DG.
The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability
.
Sports Med
.
2005
;
35
(
1
):
43
53
.
111.
Kibele
 
A,
Granacher
 
U,
Muehlbauer
 
T,
Behm
 
DG.
Stable, unstable and metastable states of equilibrium: definitions and applications to human movement
.
J Sports Sci Med
.
2015
;
14
(
4
):
885
7
.
112.
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Adaptations in the passive mechanical properties of skeletal muscle to altered patterns of use
.
J Appl Physiol. (1985)
.
2019
;
126
(
5
):
1483
91
.
113.
Prado
 
LG,
Makarenko
 
I,
Andresen
 
C,
Kruger
 
M,
Opitz
 
CA,
Linke
 
WA.
Isoform diversity of giant proteins in relation to passive and active contractile properties of rabbit skeletal muscles
.
J Gen Physiol
.
2005
;
126
(
5
):
461
80
.
114.
Hunter
 
DG,
Spriggs
 
J.
Investigation into the relationship between the passive flexibility and active stiffness of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles
.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
.
2000
;
15
(
8
):
600
6
.
115.
Pinto
 
MD,
Wilson
 
CJ,
Kay
 
AD,
Blazevich
 
AJ.
Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity- and contraction intensity-dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
.
Scand J Med Sci Sports
.
2021
;
31
(
5
):
1009
25
.
doi:10.1111/sms.13920
116.
Blackburn
 
JT,
Padua
 
DA,
Riemann
 
BL,
Guskiewicz
 
KM.
The relationships between active extensibility, and passive and active stiffness of the knee flexors
.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol
.
2004
;
14
(
6
):
683
91
.
117.
Hunter
 
DG,
Coveney
 
V,
Spriggs
 
J.
Investigation into the effect of static stretching on the active stiffness and damping characteristics of the ankle joint plantar flexors
.
Phys Ther Sport
.
2001
;
2
(
1
):
15
22
.
118.
Granata
 
KP,
Marras
 
WS.
Cost benefit of muscle co-contraction in protecting against spinal instability
.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
.
2000
;
25
(
11
):
1398
404
.
119.
Kaya
 
F,
Biçer
 
B,
Yüktaşır
 
B,
Willems
 
MET,
Yıldız
 
N.
The effects of two different stretching programs on balance control and motor neuron excitbaility
.
J Educ Train Stud
.
2018
;
6
(
5
):
85
91
.
120.
Hoch
 
MC,
Staton
 
GS,
McKeon
 
PO.
Dorsiflexion range of motion significantly influences dynamic balance
.
J Sci Med Sport
.
2011
;
14
(
1
):
90
2
.