Objectives: This study compared the longevity of high strength posterior glass ionomer and metal-reinforced glass ionomer using ART in rural settings within an 18-month observation period. Study Design: A nonblinded parallel design randomized controlled trial was conducted among children who attended dental outreach programs in a rural area of Southern India. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was performed in 92 permanent posterior teeth with either high strength posterior glass ionomer or metal-reinforced glass ionomer restorations. The allocation ratio was 1:1. Restorations were evaluated at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months after placement. Results: The success rate of metal-reinforced glass ionomer restorations was 100%, 95.4%, 90.4% and 87.2% as compared to high strength posterior glass ionomer whose success rates were 100%, 93%, 85% and 61.8% at the four follow ups respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the success rate of the two materials at the end of 18 months with the metal-reinforced glass ionomer restorations having a higher success rate (p=0.015). Conclusions : Although the clinical performance of both materials were largely similar, the metal-reinforced glass ionomer restorations had a higher success rate than the conventional GIC at the end of 18 months of follow-up.
Efficacy of GC Gold Label 9 and GC Miracle Mix® Restorations using Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Rural Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Valerie Gloria D’Costa, Deepak Kumar Singhal, Shashidhar Acharya; Efficacy of GC Gold Label 9 and GC Miracle Mix® Restorations using Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Rural Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1 January 2020; 44 (3): 148–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-44.3.3
Download citation file: