Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are well established as effective treatment options for patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, recent research suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF, even without T2DM. This evidence points to an emerging indication for the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFrEF management.
Introduction
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of oral medications initially approved to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In addition to their antihyperglycemic effects, SGLT2 inhibitors have recently also shown beneficial cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, specifically in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).1–3 HFrEF is a condition caused by structural and functional impairments, in which the heart is not able to adequately contract and the left ventricular ejection fraction is defined as ≤ 40%. This deficiency in cardiac output is unable to meet the oxygen needs of the various organs and tissues in the body.4 In 2020, about 6.9 million American adults were estimated to be living with heart failure.5 Despite adherence to the current standard of care, those with HFrEF were still found to have a poor prognosis and quality of life.6 Therefore, further investigation of optimal pharmacological therapy for HFrEF is paramount, considering the large burden that heart failure exacerbations and hospitalizations have on patients and the health care system. In 2020, the cost of care for heart failure was estimated to be $43.6 billion in the United States, with higher costs attributed to HFrEF compared to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, in which left ventricular ejection fraction is defined as ≥ 50%.5 Therefore, exploring the role of additional therapies, such as SGLT2 inhibitors, in HFrEF treatment is timely and necessary.
Mechanism of Action
SGLT2 inhibitors, including empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin and ertugliflozin, act on SGLT2 transporters, which are proteins located in the proximal renal tubules of the kidney. This action leads to reduced reabsorption of filtered glucose and increased urinary glucose excretion, thus improving diabetes control.7,8 This increased glucose excretion also promotes weight loss in many patients. It is not yet completely understood how SGLT2 inhibitors are responsible for their observed cardioprotective effects, but a leading theory states that the diuretic, glucuretic and natriuretic effects reduce volume burden, thereby reducing ventricular stress.9 This volume depletion can help reduce cardiac preload and afterload, which decreases cardiac stress and injury as well as hypertrophy and fibrosis. The resulting effect on cardiac remodeling slows the progression of heart failure. SGLT2 inhibitors can also decrease arterial pressure and stiffness to shift patients to a ketone-based myocardial metabolism. Other proposed mechanisms include reduced blood pressure, reduced inflammation and improved vascular function.6
Heart Failure Treatment Guidelines
Established evidence-based guidelines and treatments for heart failure have led to a decline in heart disease-related mortality over time.10 Current HFrEF treatment recommendations include angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; beta-blockers (specifically metoprolol succinate, bisoprolol and carvedilol); loop diuretics; aldosterone antagonists; hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate; and ivabradine.11 Since the 2017 guideline update from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), new evidence has emerged regarding the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HFrEF with or without diabetes.11–13 This data point to a new indication for SGLT2 inhibitors that is independent of their glucose lowering effects.
Improved Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With or Without T2DM
Recent landmark clinical trials have evaluated the effects of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with HFrEF with or without T2DM as shown in Table 1.1,2,12,13 Both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin were associated with significant reductions in heart failure hospitalizations and CV related deaths.12,13 This evidence highlights the clinical utility of these SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with HFrEF even without T2DM. Both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeled indications for use in HFrEF. A 2021 update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment recommends that empagliflozin or dapagliflozin may now be added to guideline-directed medical therapy for patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, with or without T2DM.11,14 Treatment for HFrEF generally begins with an angiotensinconverting-enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, along with an evidence-based beta-blocker and loop diuretics as needed for volume control. After this initial medical therapy, either the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate for Black patients or an aldosterone antagonist or a SGLT2 inhibitor can be started. These recommendations outlining the progression of medical therapy for HFrEF indicate that empagliflozin or dapagliflozin can be initiated fairly early in the course of treatment, rather than waiting for all other guideline-directed medications to be optimized. Lastly, the use of canagliflozin has also shown a significant reduction of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure when compared to placebo in patients with T2DM, however the medication does not have an FDA-labeled indication for use in heart failure.15
Adverse Reactions and Patient Counseling
SGLT2 inhibitors are generally safe, well-tolerated and have a once daily oral dosing schedule. Common adverse reactions observed in placebo-controlled clinical trials include female genital mycotic infections (dapagliflozin 6.9%, empagliflozin 5.4%), urinary tract infections (dapagliflozin 4.3%, empagliflozin 9.3%) and increased urination (dapagliflozin 3.8%, empagliflozin 3.4%).7,8 The SGLT2 inhibitor class may also rarely increase the risk for volume depletion, ketoacidosis, urosepsis and pyelonephritis, hypoglycemia, dyslipidemia, acute kidney injury, necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum (Fournier’s gangrene) and bone fractures. Caution must be taken when using these medications in patients with renal impairment and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2.7,8,14 Lastly, cost is a potential barrier to the use of SGLT2 inhibitors, as these medications are not yet available as generic formulations and are unlikely to be covered by most health insurance plans for patients without concomitant T2DM.7,8
Conclusion
The significant CV benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM raises the question as to whether these medications may have a secondary indication in HFrEF management, independent of T2DM status. While specific mechanisms for these CV benefits are still under investigation, it appears that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial effects on volume status, inflammation and cardiac remodeling. Two landmark clinical trials have provided evidence of fewer heart failure hospitalizations and CV-related deaths with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HFrEF with or without T2DM.12,13 As a result, heart failure guidelines have begun to incorporate SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of HFrEF. Pharmacists can play an important role in the management of this patient population by recommending initiation of therapy in eligible patients, monitoring for any adverse effects and educating patients about the benefits of therapy.