As urban populations increase worldwide and more demands are placed on infrastructure and buildings, the topic of adaptable building design has experienced increased interest as a way to embed adaptability into the urban building stock and avoid unnecessary demolition and waste. Evaluation tools for judging building adaptability based on physical characteristics have recently been proposed. The most common approach for these tools is to use a weighted-sum of scores for different criteria. The primary purpose of this paper was to compare a weighted-sum measurement approach against a more rigorous, less abstract measurement that involved judgements about simulated adaptation projects (called an example-based approach). These measurements were performed through expert elicitation and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) survey, where participants evaluated the relative adaptability of four case study buildings from the Clemson University campus. The results showed significant correlation between the weighted-sum approach and the example-based approach, supporting the reasonableness of using weighted-sum approaches to evaluate the adaptive potential of building designs. In addition, a separate group of experts rated adaptability of the case study buildings by providing qualitative reasons for their rankings. Unlike the other approaches, this group was not given a specific tool to guide their ratings. The qualitative data provided additional context for understanding results from the quantitative approaches.

adaptability, flexibility, sustainability, reuse, analytic hierarchy process
Abbas,
M. S.
and
Kocaoglu,
D. F.
2016
.
“Consistency Thresholds for Hierarchical Decision Model.”
2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)
,
566
–
575
.
IEEE.
Google Scholar
 
Achen,
C. H.
1982
.
Interpreting and Using Regression
(
Vol. 29
).
Sage
.
Google Scholar
 
Alwaer,
H.
and
Clements-Croome,
D. J.
2010
.
“Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Priority Setting in using the Multi-Attribute Approach for Assessing Sustainable Intelligent Buildings.”
Building and Environment
,
45
(
4
):
799
–
807
.
Google Scholar
 
Amiri,
M. P.
2010
.
“Project Selection for Oil-Fields Development by using the AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods.”
Expert Systems with Applications
,
37
(
9
):
6218
–
6224
.
Google Scholar
 
Andrade,
J. B
and
Bragança,
L.
2019
.
“Assessing Buildings’ Adaptability at Early Design Stages.”
IOP Publishing
.
Google Scholar
 
Becker,
A. K.
2019
.
“Measuring the Adaptability of University Campus Buildings using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.”
Master’s Thesis, Clemson University.
Google Scholar
 
Bhatt,
R.
and
Macwan,
J. E. M.
2011
.
“Global Weights of Parameters for Sustainable Buildings from Consultants’ Perspectives in Indian Context.”
Journal of Architectural Engineering
,
18
(
3
):
233
–
241
.
Google Scholar
 
Black,
A. K.,
Ross,
B. E.
and
Rockow,
Z.
2018
.
“Identifying Physical Features that Facilitate and Impede Building Adaptation.”
International Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings
,
52
–
62
.
Springer
.
Google Scholar
 
Bosetti,
V.,
Catenacci,
M.,
Fiorese,
G.,
and
Verdolini,
E.
2012
.
“The Future Prospect of PV and CSP Solar Technologies: An Expert Elicitation Survey.”
Energy Policy
,
49
,
308
–
317
.
Google Scholar
 
Brace,
I.
2004
.
Questionnaire Design: How to Plan, Structure, and Write Survey Material for Effective Market Research
.
London
.
Google Scholar
 
Brand,
S.
1995
.
How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built
.
Penguin
.
Google Scholar
 
Cheng,
E. W. L.
and
Li,
H.
2001
.
“Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Approach to Determine Measures for Business Performance.”
Measuring Business Excellence
,
5
(
3
):
30
–
37
.
Google Scholar
 
“Council on Open Buildings: Mission + Core Values,”
accessed 08/02, 2018, https://www.councilonopenbuilding.org/about/.
Conejos,
S.,
Langston,
C.,
and
Smith,
J.
2013
.
“AdaptSTAR Model: A Climate-Friendly Strategy to Promote Built Environment Sustainability.”
Habitat International
,
37
,
95
–
103
.
Google Scholar
 
Cowee,
N. P.
and
Schwehr,
P.
2012
.
The Typology of Adaptability in Building Construction
.
Vol. 1
.
vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
Google Scholar
 
Da Fonseca Lamounieri,
R.,
Ferreira Saraiva,
A. M.,
Rocha De Freitas,
R.,
and
Morado Nascimeno,
D.
2018
.
“Adequacy Level of Brazilian Constructive Systems to the Open Building: A Research Methodology.”
Open Building for Resilient Cities Conference
,
123
–
133
.
Google Scholar
 
Durmisevic,
E.
2006
.
“Transformable Building Structures: Design for Dissassembly as a Way to Introduce Sustainable Engineering to Building Design & Construction.”
Google Scholar
 
Forman,
E.
and
Peniwati,
K.
1998
.
“Aggregating Individual Judgments and Priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.”
European Journal of Operational Research
,
108
(
1
):
165
–
169
.
Google Scholar
 
Franek,
J.
and
Kresta,
A.
2014
.
“Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP.”
Procedia Economics and Finance
,
12
,
164
–
173
.
Google Scholar
 
Gale,
P.,
Brouwer,
A.,
Ramnial,
V.,
Kelly
L.,
Kosmider,
R.,
Fooks,
A. R.,
and
Snary,
E. L.
2010
.
“Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Vector-Borne Viruses in the EU through the Elicitation of Expert Opinion.”
Epidemiology & Infection
,
138
(
2
):
214
–
225
.
Google Scholar
 
Gass,
S. I.
and
Rapcsák,
T.
2004
.
“Singular Value Decomposition in AHP.”
European Journal of Operational Research
,
154
(
3
):
573
–
584
.
Google Scholar
 
Geraedts,
R.
2016
.
“FLEX 4.0, a Practical Instrument to Assess the Adaptive Capacity of Buildings.”
Energy Procedia
,
96
,
568
–
579
.
Google Scholar
 
Herthogs,
P.,
Debacker,
W.,
Tunçer,
B.,
Weerdt,
Y. D.
and
Temmerman,
N. D.,
2019
.
“Quantifying the Generality and Adaptability of Building Layouts Using Weighted Graphs: The SAGA Method.”
Buildings
,
9
(
4
)
92
.
Google Scholar
 
Ishizaka,
A.
and
Lusti,
M.
2004
.
“An Expert Module to Improve the Consistency of AHP Matrices.”
International Transactions in Operational Research
,
11
(
1
):
97
–
105
.
Google Scholar
 
Langston,
C.
2012
.
“Validation of the Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) Model using iconCUR.”
Facilities
,
30
(
3/4
):
105
–
123
.
Google Scholar
 
Mauter,
M. S.
and
Palmer,
V. R.
2014
.
“Expert Elicitation of Trends in Marcellus Oil and Gas Wastewater Management.”
Journal of Environmental Engineering
,
140
(
5
):
B4014004
.
Google Scholar
 
Open Building for Resilient Cities Conference 2018
,
Proceedings
,
edited by
Kendall
Stephen
.
Los Angeles
:
Council on Open Building
.
Ossadnik,
W.,
Schinke,
S.,
and
Kaspa,r
R. H.
2016
.
“Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis.”
Group Decision and Negotiation
,
25
(
2
):
421
–
457
.
Google Scholar
 
Rockow,
Z. R.,
Ross,
B. E.,
and
Black,
A. K.
2018
.
“Review of Methods for Evaluating Adaptability of Buildings.”
International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation
, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0013
.
Google Scholar
 
Ross,
B. E.
2017
.
“The Learning Buildings Framework for Quantifying Building Adaptability.”
Architectural Engineering Institute Conference
,
Oklahoma City, OK
.
Google Scholar
 
Ross,
B. E.,
Chen,
D. A.,
Conejos,
S.,
and
Khademi,
A.
2016
.
“Enabling Adaptable Buildings: Results of a Preliminary Expert Survey.”
Procedia Engineering
,
145
,
420
–
427
.
Google Scholar
 
Saaty,
T. L.
2008
.
“Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.”
International Journal of Services Sciences
,
1
(
1
):
83
–
98
.
Google Scholar
 
Saaty,
T. L.
and
Alexander,
J. M.
1981
.
Thinking with Models: Mathematical Models in the Physical, Biological, and Social Sciences
.
RWS Publications
.
Google Scholar
 
Saaty,
T. L.
and
Hu,
G.
1998
.
“Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process.”
Applied Mathematics Letters
,
11
(
4
):
121
–
125
.
Google Scholar
 
Schmidt
R.
III,
and
Austin,
S.
2016
.
Adaptable Architecture: Theory and Practice
.
Routledge
.
Google Scholar
 
United Nations
.
“2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects,”
accessed May 5, 2018, www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
Wong,
J. K.
and
Li,
H.
2008
.
“Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Intelligent Building Systems.”
Building and Environment
,
43
(
1
):
108
–
125
.
doi:
https://doi. org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019.
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

1. 310A Lowry Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0911, USA.

© 2020 by College Publishing. All rights reserved.
2020