The challenges associated with controlling particulate and chemical contamination to achieve high semiconductor device yields are demonstrated with data showing the influence of cleanroom air, semiconductor processes and tools, gases, chemicals, and Dl water. Because typical film thicknesses are much smaller than pattern feature sizes, defects that are as small as one hundredth of the lithographic dimension must be controlled. Scaling device dimensions by a factor of 1/3 to 1/2 will require almost a factor of 10 reduction of particulate levels in order to maintain the prescaling yield. To achieve a 78 percent yield (0.25 defects/cm2) in a typical submicron process containing 250 process steps, each step must contribute no more than 0.001 killer defects/cm2 on average. Storage of wafers for 1 hr in a Class 1 vertical laminar flow cleanroom is sufficient to reach this level. Considerably more defects are introduced in other process steps involving automated tools or chemical/gas exposure. As device dimensions are reduced, the contamination associated with liquids will become relatively more important than that from gases and cleanroom air.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 1988
This article was originally published in
The Journal of Environmental Sciences
Research Article|
September 21 2006
The Effects of Contamination on Semiconductor Manufacturing Yield
Carlton Osburn;
Carlton Osburn
1
Microelectronics Center of North Carolina, Research Triangle Park NC, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Donovan;
Robert Donovan
3
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Gary Jones
Gary Jones
4
Microelectronics Center of North Carolina, Research Triangle Park, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of the IEST (1988) 31 (2): 45–57.
Citation
Carlton Osburn, Henry Berger, Robert Donovan, Gary Jones; The Effects of Contamination on Semiconductor Manufacturing Yield. Journal of the IEST 1 March 1988; 31 (2): 45–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.17764/jiet.1.31.2.9863780552351680
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
4
Views
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
4
Views
Citing articles via
A New Method Using Pseudovelocity-Based Fatigue Analysis to Determine the Effectiveness of Acoustic Fields Used for Acoustic Testing
Marcos A. Underwood, PhD, Marc D. Lamparelli
Progression of Cleanroom Standards Development, 1959-1970s
Clifford “Bud” Frith
Evaluation of Copper and Gold Wire Bonds in PEM Devices
Brian Myer, Eric Gallardo, Dustin Aldridge, Stephen Melosky
Initial Development of a High-Power Solid-State Solar Simulator
Wyatt Felt, Kevin Marriott, Trenton Griffiths, Charlotte Murphy, Bryce Lembke, Nathaniel Morris