The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, tomographic, and histological performance of collagenated xenogeneic bone blocks (CXBB) in horizontal bone augmentations for implant placement. Five patients with an absence of the 4 upper incisors and an HAC 3 horizontal bone defect, with a remaining of 3 to 5 mm, underwent a bone-grafting procedure with CXBB (test group [TG], n = 5) and autogenous graft (control group [CG], n = 5), with one type of graft used on the right side and other type on the left side. Changes in bone thickness and density (tomographic evaluation), levels of complications (clinically), and distribution pattern between mineralized and nonmineralized tissue (histomorphometrically) were analyzed. Tomographic analysis showed a horizontal bone increase of 4.25 ± 0.78 mm in the TG and 3.08 ± 0.8 mm in the CG between baseline and 8 months postoperatively (P < .05). The horizontal loss between the day of installation of the blocks and 8 months postoperatively was 1.02 ± 0.39 mm for the TG and 1.10 ± 0.71 mm for the CG (P > .05). With regard to bone density, the TG blocks right after installation had 440.2 ± 89.15 HU, and after 8 months, the region reached 730.7 ± 130.98 HU, representing an increase of 29.05%. For the CG blocks, bone density increased from 1052.2 ± 398.35 HU to 1222.5 ± 453.28 HU, representing an increase of 17.03%. The increase in bone density was significantly higher in the TG (P < .05). Clinically, no cases of exposure of the bone blocks and no failure of incorporation were observed. Histomorphometrically, the percentage of mineralized tissue was lower in the TG than in the CG (48.10% ± 2.88% and 53.53% ± 1.05%, respectively), and the opposite was verified for the levels of nonmineralized tissue (52.79% ± 2.88% and 46.47% ± 1.05%, respectively; P < .05). The use of CXBB achieved higher levels of horizontal gain, with lower bone density and lower levels of mineralized tissue when compared with the use of autogenous blocks.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2023
CLINICAL|
February 16 2023
Horizontal Bone Augmentation With Autogenous and Collagenated Xenogeneic Bone Blocks: A Split-Mouth Prospective Clinical, Tomographic, and Histological Pilot Study
Evellyn Marques, DDS;
Evellyn Marques, DDS
Department of Implantology, Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
Luiz Antonio Mazzuchelli Cosmo, DDS, MSc;
Luiz Antonio Mazzuchelli Cosmo, DDS, MSc
Department of Implantology, Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
Marcelo Lucchesi Teixeira, DDS, MSc, PhD;
Marcelo Lucchesi Teixeira, DDS, MSc, PhD
Department of Implantology, Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
Luís Guilherme Scavone de Macedo, DDS, MSc, PhD;
Luís Guilherme Scavone de Macedo, DDS, MSc, PhD
*
Department of Implantology, Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Brazil.
* Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Antonio Carlos Aloise, DDS, MSc, PhD;
Antonio Carlos Aloise, DDS, MSc, PhD
Department of Implantology, Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
André Antonio Pelegrine, DDS, MSc, PhD
André Antonio Pelegrine, DDS, MSc, PhD
Department of Implantology, Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
J Oral Implantol (2023) 49 (3): 253–261.
Citation
Evellyn Marques, Luiz Antonio Mazzuchelli Cosmo, Marcelo Lucchesi Teixeira, Luís Guilherme Scavone de Macedo, Antonio Carlos Aloise, André Antonio Pelegrine; Horizontal Bone Augmentation With Autogenous and Collagenated Xenogeneic Bone Blocks: A Split-Mouth Prospective Clinical, Tomographic, and Histological Pilot Study. J Oral Implantol 1 June 2023; 49 (3): 253–261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00115
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
272
Views
Citing articles via
Maxillary implant-supported overdenture in a heavy smoker patient with generalized stage IV grade C periodontitis: A clinical case report
Christopher Prechtl, Dr. med. dent., Bernadette Pretzl, Prof. Dr. med. dent., Hans Ulrich Brauer, Dr. med. dent., Dr. phil., M.A., M.Sc.
Comparison of the Operational Difficulty and Patient-Related Outcomes for Removing Displaced Dental Implants or Tooth Roots Into the Maxillary Sinus
Aydin Ozkan, DDS, PhD, Sara Samur Erguven, DDS, PhD, Hilal Peker Ozturk, DDS, PhD, Bugra Senel, DDS, PhD
Patient-Specific Subperiosteal Titanium Implant for Maxillary Reconstruction Following Oncologic Resection: A One-Year Follow-Up Case Report
Aydın Onur Gerçek, DDS, Selen Adiloğlu, DDS, PhD, Berke Karaer, DDS, Bahadır Ersu, DDS, PhD, Hakan Hıfzı Tüz, DDS, PhD
Threshold for Implant Removal in Peri-implantitis Defects. Is There Any?
Jacob M. Zimmer, DDS, Jonathan E. Misch, DDS, Paolo Nava, DDS, Hamoun Sabri, DDS, Javier Calatrava, DDS, MDS, Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD
O. Hilt Tatum Jr, DDS – A Pioneer for Implant Dentistry and AAID Leader
James W. Gibney, DMS