The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the Morse effect of different internal tapered implant-abutment connections (ITCs) using a pullout test. Implants with different ITCs were selected: Short (Bicon, USA), G1; Novo Colosso (Medens, Brazil), G2; Epkut (SIN, Brazil), G3; Strong SW (SIN, Brazil), G4; Flash (Conexão, Brazil), G5 and Bone Level (Straumann, Switzerland), G6. The respective computer-aided design (CAD) files were loaded into the analysis software to measure each ITC’s taper angle and implant-abutment contact area. Six implants from each group were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the respective universal abutments were fixed using a mallet (G1) or by applying 20 Ncm of torque (G2 to G6). After 10 minutes, each abutment’s retention screw was removed, and the force necessary for abutment rupture was recorded using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test. Spearman’s correlation was used to check the correlation of the taper angle and contacting area with the pullout strength. G1, a no-screw abutment with a 3° taper, and G2, a 10° tapered abutment tightened by 20 Ncm, presented the highest pullout strength (P < .05). The increased taper angle of G4, compared to G3, reduced the Morse effect despite their similar implant-abutment contacting areas (P < .05). The G5 and G6 abutments loosened after screw removal and did not exhibit pullout resistance. The closer the tapered angle (r = −.958) and the higher the implant-abutment contact area (r = .880), the higher the pullout strength (P < .001). Within the limits of this study, the Morse effect is different among tapered implant-abutment connections. The closer the tapered angle and the higher the interface area, the higher the Morse effect between the abutment and the implant.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2024
CLINICAL DENTAL IMPLANT SCIENCE RESEARCH|
August 05 2024
Comparative Analysis of Internal Tapered Implant-Abutment Connections: Evaluating the Morse Effect
Renata Nogueira Barbosa Marchon, DDS, MSc, PhD;
Renata Nogueira Barbosa Marchon, DDS, MSc, PhD
1Department of Temporomandibular Disorders and Dental Occlusion, University Center Organ Mountains, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
Carlos Fernando Mourão, DMD, MS, PhD;
Carlos Fernando Mourão, DMD, MS, PhD
*
2Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
*Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
James L. Rutkowski, DMD, PhD;
James L. Rutkowski, DMD, PhD
3Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo.
Search for other works by this author on:
Shahram Ghanaati, DMD, MD, PhD;
Shahram Ghanaati, DMD, MD, PhD
4Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, FORM (Frankfurt Orofacial Regenerative Medicine) Lab, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Germany.
Search for other works by this author on:
Rafael Coutinho Mello-Machado, DDS, MSc, PhD;
Rafael Coutinho Mello-Machado, DDS, MSc, PhD
5Department of Implant Dentistry, Iguaçu University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
Plinio Mendes Senna, DDS, MSc, PhD
Plinio Mendes Senna, DDS, MSc, PhD
6Department of Prosthodontics, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Search for other works by this author on:
J Oral Implantol (2024) 50 (4): 431–434.
Citation
Renata Nogueira Barbosa Marchon, Carlos Fernando Mourão, James L. Rutkowski, Shahram Ghanaati, Rafael Coutinho Mello-Machado, Plinio Mendes Senna; Comparative Analysis of Internal Tapered Implant-Abutment Connections: Evaluating the Morse Effect. J Oral Implantol 1 August 2024; 50 (4): 431–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00039
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
188
Views
Citing articles via
Clinical report of the immediate placement implants in patients aged 80 and over: Five cases and a short review
Masachika Takiguchi, PhD, DDS, Koji Fujita, DDS, Kazumasa Yoshida, PhD, DDS
Secured Anatomy-driven Flap Extension (SAFE) for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Modified Flap Release Technique Description and Retrospective Study
Jad Majzoub, BDS, Marius Steigmann, DDS, MS, Hsun-Liang Chan, DDS, MS
Regulation of Osteogenic and Angiogenic Markers in Alkali Treated Titanium for Hard Tissue Engineering Applications
Prantik Roy Chowdhury, MDS, Dexter Kling, MDS, Michael R. Markiewicz, MDS, Paige Bothwell, MDS, Sahar Vahabzadeh, MDS
Effect of Clinical Experience on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guidance: an in vitro Study
Qiao Fang, DDS, MSD, Jaime Lozada, DDS, Joseph Kan, DDS, MS, Aladdin Al-Ardah, DDS, MS, Yiming Li, DDS, MSD, PhD
Survival rate and aesthetic outcomes of two-piece zirconia dental implants: A one-year single clinical trial of partially edentulous patients
Yaniv Mayer, D.M.D., Ofir Ginesin, D.M.D. M.Sc., Daniel Rotenberg, D.M.D., Liron Kabakov, D.M.D. M. Sc., Eran Gabay, D.M.D., Ph.D., Jacob Horwitz, D.M.D., Gutmacher Zvi, D.M.D., Hadar Zigdon Giladi, D.M.D, Ph.D.