Introduction

Interest in immediate replacement of teeth has increased in recent years by patients and clinicians alike. Thanks to improvement in techniques and materials, immediate implant placement and loading has become more predictable.14  Recent studies have shown that immediate implant placement accompanied with bone grafting reduces the horizontal resorption of the facial bone caused by tooth extraction.58  To reduce the horizontal bone resorption and prevent recession, 2 techniques have been proposed: the buccal plate preservation technique,9,10  and the dual-zone therapeutic concept.11  In the following case we will present a technique utilizing both approaches.

Case Report

A 39-year-old male presented to the dental clinic with a complaint: “I want to replace my fractured tooth.” Past medical history revealed no contraindication to dental treatment. Oral examination revealed acceptable oral hygiene, few restored teeth, and fractured upper left second premolar (#13) (Figures 1 and 2). Periodontal examination revealed thick periodontal biotype, normal gingival scallop, and probing depth ranging from 1–3 mm. Radiographic examination showed previous root canal treatment for tooth #13 and normal proximal bone levels (Figure 3). A treatment plan was formulated and discussed with the patient; it was decided to extract tooth #13 and replace it immediately with an endosseous implant, bone graft, and an immediate provisional crown.

Figures 1–6

Figure 1. Initial clinical situation of maxillary left second premolar. Figure 2. Initial clinical situation occlusal view. Figure 3. Periapical radiograph showing good proximal bone levels, substandard endodontic treatment. Figure 4. Use of periotome for cutting of the periodontal ligament fibers. Figure 5. Atraumatic extraction to preserve the buccal bone. Figure 6. Immediate implant placement in proper prosthetically guided position, leaving 3 mm of space to the buccal bone, 3 mm apical to the free gingival margin.

Figures 1–6

Figure 1. Initial clinical situation of maxillary left second premolar. Figure 2. Initial clinical situation occlusal view. Figure 3. Periapical radiograph showing good proximal bone levels, substandard endodontic treatment. Figure 4. Use of periotome for cutting of the periodontal ligament fibers. Figure 5. Atraumatic extraction to preserve the buccal bone. Figure 6. Immediate implant placement in proper prosthetically guided position, leaving 3 mm of space to the buccal bone, 3 mm apical to the free gingival margin.

Surgical treatment

Under local anesthesia (Lidocaine 2%, Epinephrine 1:100 000) with buccal and palatal infiltration, tooth #13 was atraumatically extracted in a flapless technique with a periotome and forceps (Figure 4). The socket was curetted and irrigated with saline, and the buccal wall was evaluated and deemed intact. The faciopalatal dimension of the socket measured 8 mm (Figure 5). Osteotomy was initiated according to the manufacturer's instructions in a palatal direction and a standard diameter implant (Straumann Bone Level Implant RC Ø 4.1 mm × 12 mm) was immediately inserted, leaving at least 3 mm of space from the buccal wall and seated 3 mm apical to the free gingival margin (Figure 6). The primary stability of the implant was 40Ncm, which permitted immediate provisionalization. A screw-retained provisional crown was fabricated before the grafting procedure to avoid any contamination of the bone graft. With a periosteal elevator, a small pouch was created facial to the buccal bone in a full thickness manner in the middle area of the socket, slowly extending beyond the mucogingival line in a mesiodistal direction (Figure 7). Then xenograft bone granules (0.25–1 mm, Geistlich Bio-Oss, Princeton, NJ) were hydrated with saline and placed in the pouch until adequately filled, then the xenograft was also added in the gap between the implant and buccal bone until the gap was filled to the soft tissue level (Figure 8). The provisional crown was screwed to the implant, and the access was closed with cotton pellet and composite, occlusion was checked, and there was no contact in centric and eccentric movements (Figure 9). Postimplant radiograph showed proper implant placement and proper abutment adaptation (Figure 10). Postoperative instructions were given to the patient, which included adhering to a soft diet, avoiding hot or spicy foods, and avoiding rinsing the mouth vigorously. Medication prescribed Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 5 days, Ibuprofen 400 mg every 8 hours for 5 days and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate oral rinse twice a day for 2 weeks.

Figures 7–12

Figure 7. Pouch preparation on the facial aspect of the buccal bone extending to the mucogingival junction. Figure 8. Xenograft material packed in the pouch and in the buccal and tissue zones all the way to the free gingival margin. Figure 9. Screw-retained provisional crown delivered to contain the bone graft and preserve the soft tissue architecture. Figure 10. Periapical radiograph showing proper implant position and abutment adaptation. Figure 11. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material adapted to the final crown. Figure 12: The copy abutment of the final crown.

Figures 7–12

Figure 7. Pouch preparation on the facial aspect of the buccal bone extending to the mucogingival junction. Figure 8. Xenograft material packed in the pouch and in the buccal and tissue zones all the way to the free gingival margin. Figure 9. Screw-retained provisional crown delivered to contain the bone graft and preserve the soft tissue architecture. Figure 10. Periapical radiograph showing proper implant position and abutment adaptation. Figure 11. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material adapted to the final crown. Figure 12: The copy abutment of the final crown.

Prosthetic treatment

After 4 months the prosthetic phase was initiated. The provisional crown was removed and an impression post for closed tray was inserted; flowable composite was immediately injected around the post to capture the well-developed soft tissue architecture created by the provisional crown to transform it to the final impression. With a custom tray in a closed-tray technique, a polyether final impression was taken. The impression was poured and the master models were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator. A custom abutment was selected, and a porcelain fused to metal crown was fabricated. At the time of delivery, the custom titanium abutment was screwed to the implant, torqued to 35 Ncm, and a sterile cotton pellet was used to close the access. A copy abutment was fabricated by using vinyl polysiloxane impression material applied to the fitting surface and the outer surface of the crown, which would be used to remove excess cement (Figures 11 and 12). Zinc oxide eugenol cement was mixed and brushed on the fitting surface of the crown and then tried on the copy abutment to remove excess cement. The crown was cemented on the final abutment, and all excess cement was removed. One-year follow-up showed stable soft tissue architecture with optimal esthetics (Figures 13 and 14). Radiographs showed stable bone levels and proper implant position (Figure 15).

Figures 13–15

Figure 13. One-year follow-up showing proper soft tissue thickness. Figure 14. One-year follow-up showing excellent esthetics, stable soft tissue architecture. Figure 15. One-year follow-up periapical radiograph showing stable bone levels.

Figures 13–15

Figure 13. One-year follow-up showing proper soft tissue thickness. Figure 14. One-year follow-up showing excellent esthetics, stable soft tissue architecture. Figure 15. One-year follow-up periapical radiograph showing stable bone levels.

Discussion

When clinicians face a situation regarding whether or not to extract a tooth, the decision is not easy to make. But when indicated, extraction and immediate implant placement is a highly predictable procedure when proper guidelines are followed. Case selection is the most important criteria. Kois mentioned the 5 diagnostic keys for predictable peri-implant esthetics: relative tooth position, form of the periodontium, biotype of the periodontium, tooth shape, and position of the osseous crest.12  Further, the type of socket present after extraction is important; type I is the most favorable for immediate implant placement due to proper levels of bone and soft tissue in relation to the cementoenamel junction.13  When atraumatic extraction is performed with a flapless approach, the gingival architecture and blood supply to the buccal plate is preserved; therefore, every effort should be made to maintain an intact buccal plate. Using a surgical guide can be beneficial even in single tooth replacement, not only does it provide prosthetically guided implant position but also prevents elliptical osteotomy preparation.14  Rosa et al mentioned a technique for proper implant size selection, in which the implant size is selected with a goal of leaving a 3 mm space from the implant surface to the outer buccal wall. This 3-mm gap provides better placement and compaction of grafting material.15  Many techniques have been proposed to decrease the amount of hard and soft tissue collapse after extraction and immediate implant placement, with different ranges of success.1624 

The buccal plate preservation technique showed that alveolar ridge and soft tissue contours can be maintained by overcompensating with xenograft material packed in a pouch that is facial to the buccal plate.10  In an animal study, it was histologically proven that placement of Bio-Oss Collagen in the void between an implant and the buccal-approximal bone walls of a fresh extraction socket modified the process of hard tissue healing by providing additional amounts of hard tissue at the entrance of the previous socket, improved the level of marginal bone-to-implant contact, and prevented soft tissue recession.25  The dual zone therapeutic technique explains that when the 2 regions—the tissue zone and bone zone—are grafted by different types of bone replacements, substitutes, and/or materials, it helps serve as a scaffold to maintain hard and soft tissue volume as well as blood clot for initial healing.11  In addition, immediate provisionalization when primary implant stability is favorable (> 45 Ncm) serves as a prosthetic seal to contain the bone graft material.26  The research outcomes of the dual zone therapeutic technique showed that grafting the bone and tissue minimized ridge collapse to −0.1 mm and increased peri-implant soft tissue thickness by +0.5–1.0 mm.27 

In conclusion, utilizing all the aforementioned techniques was shown to maintain the bone and soft tissue contour in the case presented. It is important to note that these procedures were performed when there was an intact buccal plate after extraction. However, several studies have suggested that immediate implant placement and provisionalization should not be performed in cases of buccal bone defects extending to the buccal crest. Such situations require a staged procedure with hard tissue grafting before implant placement and connection of a restoration.2830  Further long-term studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of these procedures.

References

References
1
Becker
W,
Becker
BE,
Israelson
H,
et al.
One-step surgical placement of Branemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
.
1997
;
12
:
454
456
.
2
Polizzi
G,
Grunder
U,
Goenè
R,
et al.
Immediate and delayed implant placement intro extraction sockets: a 5-year report
.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
.
2000
;
2
:
93
99
.
3
Gomes
A,
Lozada
JL,
Caplanis
N,
Kleinman
A.
Immediate loading of a single hydroxyapatite-coated threaded root form implant: a clinical report
.
J Oral Implantol
.
1998
;
24
:
159
166
.
4
Ericson
I,
Nilson
H,
Lindh
T,
Nilner
K,
Randow
K.
Immediate functional loading of Brànemark single tooth implants. An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2000
;
11
:
26
.
5
Schropp
L,
Wenzel
A,
Kostopoulos
L,
Karring
T.
Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study
.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
.
2003
;
23
:
313
323
.
6
Cabello
G,
Rioboo
M,
Fábrega
JG.
Immediate placement and restoration of implants in the aesthetic zone with a trimodal approach: soft tissue alterations and its relation to gingival biotype
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2013
;
24
:
1094
1100
.
7
Caiazzo
A,
Brugnami
F,
Mehra
P.
Buccal plate preservation with immediate post-extraction implant placement and provisionalization: preliminary results of a new technique
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
.
2013
;
42
:
666
670
.
8
Degidi
M,
Daprile
G,
Nardi
D,
Piattelli
A.
Buccal bone plate in immediately placed and restored implant with Bio-Oss collagen graft: a 1-year follow-up study (in press)
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
9
Brugnami
F,
Caiazzo
A.
Efficacy evaluation of a new buccal bone plate preservation technique: a pilot study
.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
.
2011
;
31
:
67
73
.
10
Brugnami F, Caiazzo A
.
Immediate placement and provisionalization with buccal plate preservation: a case report of a new technique
.
J Oral Implantol
.
2013
;
39
:
380
385
.
11
Chu
SJ,
Salama
MA,
Salama
H,
et al.
The dual-zone therapeutic concept of managing immediate implant placement and provisional restoration in anterior extraction sockets
.
Compend Contin Educ Dent
.
2012
;
33
:
524
532
,
534
.
12
Kois
JC.
Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys
.
Compend Contin Educ Dent
.
2004
:
25
:
895
905
.
13
Elian
N,
Cho
SC,
Froum
S,
et al.
A simplified socket classification and repair technique
.
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent
.
2007
;
19
:
99
104
.
14
Schnitman
PA,
Hayashi
C,
Han
RK.
Why guided when freehand is easier, quicker, and less costly?
J Oral Implantol
.
2014
;
40
:
670
678
.
15
Rosa
JCM,
Rosa
ACPO,
Francischone
CE,
Sotto-Maior
BS.
Diameter selection of implants placed in extraction sockets: a new approach
.
Dental Press Implantol
.
2014
;
8
:
80
89
.
16
Grunder
U.
Crestal ridge width changes when placing implants at the time of tooth extraction with and without soft tissue augmentation after a healing period of 6 months: report of 24 consecutive cases
.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
.
2011
;
31
:
9
17
.
17
Tsuda
H,
Rungcharassaeng
K,
Kan
JY,
Roe
P,
Lozada
JL,
Zimmerman
G.
Peri-implant tissue response following connective tissue and bone grafting in conjunction with immediate single-tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: a case series
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
.
2011
;
26
:
427
436
.
18
Cosyn
J,
Eghbali
A,
De Bruyn
H,
Collys
K,
Cleymaet
R,
De Rouck
T.
Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics
.
J Clin Periodontol
.
2011
;
38
:
746
753
.
19
Bottini
LP,
Ricci
L,
Piattelli
A,
Perrotti
V,
Iezzi
G.
Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes around implants immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets in association or not with porcine bone: a non-blinded randomized controlled trial in humans
.
J Periodontol
.
In press
.
20
Barone
A,
Ricci
M,
Calvo-Guirado
JL,
Covani
U.
Bone remodelling after regenerative procedures around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in Beagle dogs
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2011
;
22
:
1131
1137
.
21
Caneva
M,
Botticelli
D,
Pantani
F,
Baffone
GM,
Rangel
IG
Jr,
Lang
NP.
Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2012
;
23
:
106
112
.
22
Jimbo
R,
Marin
C,
Witek
L,
et al.
Bone morphometric evaluation around immediately placed implants covered with porcine-derived pericardium membrane: an experimental study in dogs
.
Int J Biomater
.
2012
;
2012
:
279167
.
23
Tovar
N,
Jimbo
R,
Marin
C,
et al.
Bone regeneration around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets covered with a dual-layer PTFE/collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs
.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
.
2014
;
34
:
849
855
.
24
Migliorati
M,
Amorfini
L,
Signori
A,
Biavati
AS,
Benedicenti
S.
Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post-extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: a 2-year randomized clinical trial
.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
.
2015
;
17
:
983
995
.
25
Araujo
MG,
Linder
E,
Lindhe
J.
Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2011
;
22
:
1
8
.
26
Trimpou
G,
Weigl
P,
Krebs
M,
et al.
Rationale for esthetic tissue preservation of a fresh extraction socket by an implant treatment concept simulating a tooth replantation
.
Dent Traumatol
.
2010
;
26
:
105
111
.
27
Tarnow
DP,
Chu
SJ,
Salama
MA,
et al.
Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. The effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change–a retrospective cohort study
.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
.
2014
;
34
:
323
331
.
28
Kan
JY,
Rungcharassaeng
K,
Sclar
A,
Lozada
JL.
Effects of the facial osseous defect morphology on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration: 1-year results
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
.
2007
;
65
:
13
19
.
29
Chen
ST,
Darby
IB,
Reynolds
EC.
A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2007
;
18
:
552
562
.
30
Cordaro
L,
Torsello
F,
Roccuzzo
M.
Clinical outcome of submerged vs non-submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2009
;
20
:
1307
1313
.