Dental implant demand is expected to grow at an annual rate of 11% between now and 2028. The market is expected to be valued at $8 billion by then. Patients want teeth that are stable, efficient, and esthetically pleasing. If their natural teeth do not meet those desires, then many will make the investment in dental implants. The majority of implant cases will meet, or exceed, the patient's expectations. However, just as multiple local and systemic risk factors can decrease the probability for survival of natural teeth, those same risk factors will be present for dental implants and jeopardize their long-term success.

Along with a large number of implants being placed, the future will also bring complications. Dental implant complications will include technical, mechanical, and biological issues.1  Technical and mechanical complications include abutment screw loosening, fracture of the overdenture prostheses, activation of retentive clips, ceramic chipping, fractures, etc. Biological complications include peri-implant mucositis, mucosal enlargement, peri-implantitis (bone loss), pain, inflammation, possible implant loss, and more.2  Undoubtedly, every implant dentist reading this editorial can relate to all of these complications. Simonis et al,3  found that on follow-up of implants ≤16 years, there was a cumulative survival rate of 82.94% and a cumulative complication rate of 48.03% (biological 16.94%, technical 31.09%). The majority of implant losses and biological complications were concentrated in a small group of patients. Technical/mechanical complications were spread out over a larger number of patients. Consequently, there were many successes with a smaller number of patients experiencing most of the complications. This translates to considerable additional chairside time being spent on nearly half of the cases after placement. This is a mutual problem for both patients and clinicians.

Currently, complications are a widespread problem as witnessed by the large number of complication-related articles in peer-reviewed journals. A PubMed search on all dental journals between January 1, 2019 and April 23, 2021 revealed that there are 1176 articles published on the topic of dental complications. In that same time-period, JOI published many implant complication-related articles that include peri-implantitis; intraoperative, systemic medication effects; sinus surgery; genetic effects; all-4-screw prosthesis; prosthetic; plus others.412 

Patients and clinicians would both benefit if the implantologist could take the complication rate from 48% to near zero. Medical comorbidities and perioperative risks for patients will become increasingly complex as patients live longer. Our colleagues in orthopedics are making collaborative efforts to decrease surgical orthopedic complication rates. Steps being taken by orthopedists include prudent presurgical assessments regarding indications, risks, and benefits. They have concluded that an organized, systematic, coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to the perioperative management of patients have resulted in decreased complications.13 

Implant dentistry's complication rate will diminish if researchers, manufacturers, and clinicians work together to discover evidence-based solutions. Clinicians should focus on (i) prevention that includes thorough diagnoses and treatment planning, (ii) precise placement/restoration techniques, and (iii) early detection with proper treatment of complications. Patients also have a responsibility in this near-zero complication goal by practicing state-of-the-art daily oral hygiene with proper diet considerations.

1. 
Liaw
K,
Delfini
RH,
Abrahams
JJ.
Dental implant complications
.
Semin Ultrasound CT MR
.
2015
;
36
:
427
433
.
2. 
Srinivasan
M,
Meyer
S,
Mombelli
A,
Müller
F.
Dental implants in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2017
;
28
:
920
930
.
3. 
Simonis
P,
Dufour
T,
Tenenbaum
H.
Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants
.
Clin Oral Implants Res
.
2010
;
21
:
772
777
.
4. 
Chen
X,
Zhao
Y.
Genetic involvement in dental implant failure: association with polymorphisms of genes modulating inflammatory responses and bone metabolism
.
J Oral Implantol
.
2019
;
45
:
318
326
.
5. 
Fang
Y,
Bi
Y,
Mashrah
M,
et al.
Does sinus floor elevation in the presence of Schneiderian membrane pathology increase therisk of membrane perforation and implant failure rate?
J Oral Implantol
.
In press
.
6. 
Ferreira
GZ,
Bachesk
AB,
Bachesk
AB,
et al.
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants and the importance of a preventive evaluation for osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with medications
.
J Oral Implantol
.
2020
;
46
:
431
437
.
7. 
Flanagan
D.
Leptin and peri-implantitis
.
J Oral Implantol
.
In press
.
8. 
Oh
JH,
Kim
YS,
Lim
JY,
Choi
BH.
Stress distribution on the prosthetic screws in the all-on-4 concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis
.
J Oral Implantol
.
2020
;
46
:
3
12
.
9. 
Park
WB,
Herr
Y,
Kwon
YD,
Shin
SI,
Lim
HC.
Advanced peri-implantitis and implant removal as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients on oral bisphosphonate therapy
.
J Oral Implantol
.
In press
.
10. 
Park
WB,
Kim
YJ,
Park
JS,
Han
JY,
Lim
HC.
Complication and salvage of sinus floor elevation in the maxillary sinus with asymptomatic and non-calcified fungus colonization: a case report
.
J Oral Implantol
.
In press
.
11. 
Varvara
G,
Sinjari
B,
Caputi
S,
Scarano
A,
Piattelli
M.
The relationship between time of retightening and preload loss of abutment screws for two different implant designs: an in vitro study
.
J Oral Implantol
.
2020
;
46
:
13
17
.
12. 
Yoon
SH,
Jung
S,
Kang
T,
Yang
HC.
Accidental swallowing of dental implant: complication of transnasal endoscopic removal from maxillary sinus
.
J Oral Implantol
.
2019
;
45
:
219
222
.
13. 
Greenstein
AS,
Gorczyca
JT.
Orthopedic surgery and the geriatric patient
.
Clin Geriatr Med
.
2019
;
35
:
65
92
.