Comprehensive Comparison of the 5-Year Results of All-on-4 Mandibular Implant Systems With Acrylic and Ceramic Suprastructures | Citedby Results | Journal of Oral Implantology

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Comprehensive Comparison of the 5-Year Results of All-on-4 Mandibular Implant Systems With Acrylic and Ceramic Suprastructures

J Oral Implantol (2015) 41 (6): 675–683.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

A Retrospective Evaluation of 5 Years of Clinical Results of Metal–Ceramic vs. Monolithic Zirconia Superstructures in Maxillary All-on-4TM Concept

Mustafa Ayna
Søren Jepsen

Journal of Clinical Medicine (2024) 13 (2): 557.

The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Suleyman Cagatay Dayan
Onur Geckili

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering (2021) 24 (14): 1606.

Six-year clinical outcomes of implant-supported acrylic vs. ceramic superstructures according to the All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla

Mustafa Ayna
Fatih Karayürek
Søren Jepsen
Marie Emmert
Yahya Acil
Jörg Wiltfang
Aydin Gülses

Odontology (2021) 109 (4): 930.

Long-Term Clinical Behavior and Complications of Intentionally Tilted Dental Implants Compared with Straight Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann
Ignacio García-Gil
Patricia Pedregal
Jesús Peláez
Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
María Jesús Suárez

Biology (2021) 10 (6): 509.

Stress Distribution on the Prosthetic Screws in the All-on-4 Concept: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Ji-Hyeon Oh
Young-Seong Kim
Joong Yeon Lim
Byung-Ho Choi

Journal of Oral Implantology (2020) 46 (1): 3.

A clinical study on the 6-year outcomes of immediately loaded three implants for completely edentulous mandibles: “the all-on-3 concept”

Mustafa Ayna
Keyvan Sagheb
Ralf Gutwald
Henning Wieker
Christian Flörke
Yahya Açil
Jörg Wiltfang
Aydin Gülses

Odontology (2020) 108 (1): 133.

Stress Analysis Of Fixed Dental Prostheses Produced With Different Materials According To The All-On-Four Concept

Ahmet ÇALIŞKAN
İsa YÖNDEM

Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research (2019) 3 (3): 183.

A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6 mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading

Mustafa Ayna
Bastian Wessing
Ralf Gutwald
Andreas Neff
Thomas Ziebart
Yahya Açil
Jörg Wiltfang
Aydin Gülses

Odontology (2019) 107 (2): 244.

Prosthodontic Complications of Metal‐Ceramic and All‐Ceramic, Complete‐Arch Fixed Implant Prostheses with Minimum 5 Years Mean Follow‐Up Period. A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Chi Kin Kenneth Wong
Unnati Narvekar
Haralampos Petridis

Journal of Prosthodontics (2019) 28 (2)

A comparative study on 7-year results of “All-on-Four™” immediate-function concept for completely edentulous mandibles: metal-ceramic vs. bar-retained superstructures

Mustafa Ayna
Aydin Gülses
Yahya Acil

Odontology (2018) 106 (1): 73.

Number of implants placed for complete‐arch fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Waldemar Daudt Polido
Tara Aghaloo
Thomas W. Emmett
Thomas D. Taylor
Dean Morton

Clinical Oral Implants Research (2018) 29 (S16): 154.

Clinical performance of intentionally tilted implants versus axially positioned implants: A systematic review

Wei‐Shao Lin
Steven E. Eckert

Clinical Oral Implants Research (2018) 29 (S16): 78.

Mandibular Full‐Arch Fixed Prostheses Supported on 4 Implants with Either Axial Or Tilted Distal Implants: A 3‐Year Prospective Study

Stefan Krennmair
Michael Weinländer
Michael Malek
Thomas Forstner
Gerald Krennmair
Michael Stimmelmayr

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (2016) 18 (6): 1119.