Here, 4 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are compared to test for the presence of avian malaria, including both the Plasmodium and Haemoproteus genera, in 29 different species of African rainforest birds. Two of these PCR assays use primer sets that amplify fragments of the cytochrome b (cyt b) gene of Plasmodium; the other 2 target the 18S ribosomal subunit gene. These PCR assays were performed using genomic DNA extracted from blood and subsequently compared with the results obtained by microscopic examination of blood smears taken from the same individuals. The 2 primer sets amplifying the cyt b gene were found to perform more reliably than those that target the 18S rRNA gene and yielded a substantial number of positive samples that were undetected by blood smear analysis. Of all the individuals screened by PCR, 40% tested positive for avian malaria, whereas 27% tested positive by blood smear analysis. Although sequence variation in the parasites may prohibit the specific alignment of primers and the subsequent PCR amplification of some individuals, PCR, once optimized, is faster, cheaper, and more reliable than blood smear analysis for large-scale screening.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2002
RESEARCH NOTES|
August 01 2002
A Comparative Analysis of PCR-Based Detection Methods for Avian Malaria
F. Alexander Richard;
F. Alexander Richard
aCenter for Tropical Research, Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, California 94132
Search for other works by this author on:
Ravinder N. M. Sehgal;
Ravinder N. M. Sehgal
aCenter for Tropical Research, Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, California 94132
bTo whom correspondence should be addressed
Search for other works by this author on:
Hugh I. Jones;
Hugh I. Jones
cDepartment of Microbiology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6907, Western Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas B. Smith
Thomas B. Smith
aCenter for Tropical Research, Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, California 94132
dCenter for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California, Los Angeles, 1365 Hershey Hall, P.O. Box 951496, Los Angeles, California 90095-1496. [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
J Parasitol (2002) 88 (4): 819–822.
Citation
F. Alexander Richard, Ravinder N. M. Sehgal, Hugh I. Jones, Thomas B. Smith; A Comparative Analysis of PCR-Based Detection Methods for Avian Malaria. J Parasitol 1 August 2002; 88 (4): 819–822. doi: https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0819:ACAOPB]2.0.CO;2
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
AN UPDATED KEY TO THE GENERA OF CALIGIDAE (COPEPODA: SIPHONOSTOMATOIDA)
James P. Bernot, Geoffrey A. Boxshall, Terue Cristina Kihara, Pedro Martínez Arbizu
HELMINTH EGGS FROM PACHYCROCUTA BREVIROSTRIS (CARNIVORA, HYAENIDAE) COPROLITES FROM TAURIDA CAVE (EARLY PLEISTOCENE, CRIMEA)
Tatiana N. Sivkova, Daniyar R. Khantemirov, Dmitriy O. Gimranov, Alexander V. Lavrov
IT’S NOT ALWAYS ABOUT THE PARASITES
Reginald B. Blaylock
ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2024 CLARK P. READ MENTOR AWARD
Vasyl V. Tkach