The use of new powerful nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques to identify and screen for prevalence of parasites has a huge potential. It allows for the detection and identification of low-intensity infections, but its high sensitivity and technical setup may also induce problems. Here, we report a cautionary note regarding misleading amplification of avian malaria species (Haemoproteus and Plasmodium) during Leucocytozoon spp. detection. We used a previously described nested PCR method for the molecular detection of avian malaria and Leucocytozoon spp. In the first step of the PCR protocol, these parasites are detected simultaneously; in the second PCR, Haemoproteus and Plasmodium spp. are separated from Leucocytozoon spp. However, in certain cases when a bird was infected with avian malaria, we obtained a slightly longer PCR product during the detection of Leucocytozoon spp. Our data imply that these “false” Leucocytozoon fragments are the consequences of strong amplification of certain malaria lineages in the first PCR, which can also be detected after the second PCR amplification that is specific to Leucocytozoon spp. parasites. Because these “false” Leucocytozoon fragments are slightly longer than the normal Leucocytozoon fragments, we suggest the use of well-separating agarose gels, several positive controls, and molecular standards to facilitate their separation. If one obtains a fragment that differs in length from the one expected for Leucocytozoon spp., sequencing is essential. More generally, in order to limit this type of problem with nested PCR protocols, we suggest that the first and the second primer pair be chosen so that they have different annealing temperatures.
A Cautionary Note on the Use of Nested PCR for Parasite Screening—An Example From Avian Blood Parasites
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Eszter Szöllősi, Olof Hellgren, Dennis Hasselquist; A Cautionary Note on the Use of Nested PCR for Parasite Screening—An Example From Avian Blood Parasites. J Parasitol 1 April 2008; 94 (2): 562–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1286.1
Download citation file: