OBJECTIVES Limited data exist regarding clinical outcomes of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in children treated with vancomycin. Treatment success in adults correlates best with an area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24/MIC) ratio ≥400. It is unknown if this relationship is useful in children.

METHODS Charts of children who received vancomycin ≥5 days for MRSA bacteremia with a steady state trough were reviewed. AUC24/MIC ratios were estimated using 2 different vancomycin clearance equations. Vancomycin treatment failure was defined as persistent bacteremia ≥7 days, recurrent bacteremia within 30 days, or 30-day mortality.

RESULTS There were 67 bacteremia episodes in 65 patients. Nine (13.4%) met failure criteria: persistent bacteremia (n = 6), recurrent bacteremia (n = 2), 30-day mortality (n = 1). There were no differences between patients receiving <60 mg/kg/day and ≥60 mg/kg/day of vancomycin in median trough (11.9 versus 12.3 mg/L, p = 0.1). Troughs did not correlate well with AUC24/MIC ratios (R2 = 0.32 and 0.22). Patients receiving ≥60 mg/kg/day had greater probability of achieving ratios ≥400. There were no significant differences in median dose (p = 0.8), trough (p = 0.24), or AUC24/MIC ratios (p = 0.07 and p = 0.6) between patients with treatment success and failure.

CONCLUSIONS Treatment failure was lower than previously reported in children. AUC24/MIC ratios ≥400 were frequently achieved but were not associated with treatment success, dose, or troughs. Prospective studies using standard definitions of vancomycin treatment failure are needed to understand treatment failure in children with MRSA bacteremia.

Limited data exist regarding clinical outcomes of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in children treated with vancomycin.17 Studies in adults suggest that vancomycin treatment success correlates best with an estimated area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24/MIC) ratio ≥400, but this relationship has not been established in children.6,810 Guidelines suggest that higher trough concentrations increase the probability of achieving a target AUC24/MIC ratio ≥400, but this also has not been validated in children.3,11,12 Pharmacokinetic models suggest that ratios ≥400 may be achievable in pediatric patients with lower trough concentrations than in adults.1315 However, trough concentrations have not been shown to correlate well with AUC24/MIC ratios in the pediatric population.3,1517 

In a study of 22 children with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin, Welsh et al2 reported a treatment failure of 50%, but vancomycin trough concentrations and estimated AUC24/MIC ratios were not reported. Treatment failure was reported to be 35% in a multicenter study of children with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin with a measured steady state vancomycin trough concentration (n = 174). While trough concentrations and risk factors for treatment failure were evaluated, AUC24/MIC ratios were not. In their study, treatment failure was associated with critical illness and source of infection (musculoskeletal and endovascular) but not with vancomycin MICs or troughs.4 For 59 children with MRSA bacteremia, treatment failure (37%) was not associated with AUC24/MIC ratios.1 The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the rate of vancomycin treatment failure in children with primary or secondary MRSA bacteremia. Secondary objectives assessed the correlation between vancomycin trough concentrations and the corresponding estimated AUC24/MIC ratios as well as the relationship of dose, trough, and estimated AUC24/MIC ratio with vancomycin treatment failure.

Study Population. This was a single-center, retrospective study of children with MRSA bacteremia who received vancomycin from February 2005 through January 2015 at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital in Memphis, TN. Patients with a blood culture positive for MRSA were identified through the electronic medical record and microbiology records. Patients were included if they were 2 months to 17 years of age, had a confirmed diagnosis of MRSA bacteremia, and had at least 1 appropriately drawn steady state vancomycin trough concentration. Trough concentrations were considered appropriately drawn if the trough level was drawn within 1 hour of administration of the next vancomycin dose. Patients were excluded if they received vancomycin therapy for fewer than 5 days, received non-weight-based dosing, were treated while admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (due to variability of pharmacokinetics and renal function), or complete medical records were unable to be located. Patients who were excluded for non-weight-based dosing were adult sized and received doses, such as 1000 or 1500 mg, which were less than traditional pediatric weight-based dosing of 10 to 15 mg/kg/dose. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center.

Data Collection. We collected demographic and clinical data including gender, race, age, weight, height, primary source of infection, source control documentation, if applicable (e.g., intravenous catheter removal, surgical debridement, drainage of abscess), vancomycin dosing (dose per kilogram and duration), and any additional antimicrobials for the treatment of MRSA. We collected laboratory data that included time of blood cultures, time to culture positivity, source (central venous catheter [CVC] versus peripheral blood) of positive blood culture, and vancomycin MIC. Episodes were defined as the initial positive MRSA blood culture during the patient's hospital admission; whereas, recurrence of bacteremia was defined as a new positive MRSA blood culture within 30 days of the end of vancomycin therapy.

MICs were obtained by broth microdilution using an automated susceptibility testing instrument (Vitek 2, bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). Prior to March 2009, our microbiology laboratory reported MIC values as ≤1 and 2 mg/L. After a laboratory reporting change, MIC values were reported as ≤0.5, 1, and 2 mg/L. For the purpose of consistency, this latter set of values was used for calculations, and organisms with vancomycin MICs reported as ≤1 mg/L were grouped with those reported as 1 mg/L.

Additional laboratory parameters collected included steady state vancomycin trough concentrations and serum creatinine. The first steady state trough concentration following the optimal vancomycin dose was recorded and used for evaluations. The optimal vancomycin dose was defined as the final dose requiring no further adjustment. If a dose change was made but no corresponding steady state trough concentration was available, then the preceding vancomycin dose and corresponding trough was used for analysis. Troughs between 10 and 20 mg/L were considered within the traditional therapeutic range, and undetectable trough concentrations (<5 mg/L) were reported as zero.

AUC24 was calculated using the following equation: AUC24 = vancomycin total daily dose/vancomycin clearance. There is variability in pharmacokinetic models estimating AUC24/MIC ratios. We used 2 methods to estimate vancomycin clearance. Neither the Chang18 nor Le et al14 method require repeat vancomycin trough concentrations for calculations making them practical for implementing in practice.6 Thus, our study chose to compare both of these methods of determining clearance for all patients. Chang18 developed the following equation in pediatric patients with malignancies: vancomycin clearance (mL/min) = creatinine clearance × 0.7099 + 1.4084. Le et al14 produced the following equation: vancomycin clearance (L/hr) = 0.248 × weight (kg)0.75 × (0.48/serum creatinine)0.361 × [ln(age)/7.8]0.995. For patients younger than 1 year of age, the Schwartz et al19 equation was used to estimate creatinine clearance, and the modified Schwartz and Work20 equation was used for patients ≥1 year of age.6,21 

Outcomes. The primary outcome, rate of vancomycin treatment failure, was defined as persistent bacteremia ≥7 days while receiving vancomycin therapy, recurrence of bacteremia within 30 days of the end of vancomycin therapy, or 30-day all-cause mortality.1,2,4 Secondary outcomes included correlation between vancomycin trough concentrations and their corresponding estimated AUC24/MIC ratios. Additionally, the relationship of vancomycin treatment failure with vancomycin dose, vancomycin trough concentration, and estimated AUC24/MIC ratio was evaluated.

Statistical Analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported as frequencies and medians with IQRs. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using the χ2 test. Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated using Spearman rank correlation and reported as an R2 value. The relationship of vancomycin treatment outcome (success or failure) with vancomycin dose, trough concentration, and estimated AUC24/MIC ratio was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Patient Characteristics. There were 215 episodes of MRSA bacteremia during the study period. Sixty-seven episodes of infection in 65 patients met inclusion criteria; 1 patient had 3 separate episodes of MRSA bacteremia associated with a CVC. Most episodes were excluded for absence of a measured trough concentration (n = 40, 27%) and lack of vancomycin administration (n = 36, 24.3%) (Figure). Patient demographics and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Thirty-nine patients (58%) were African-American, and 64% of patients were male. The median age of the patients was 4 years (IQR, 1.4–12 years). Musculoskeletal infections accounted for 43% (n = 29) of bacteremia episodes, while 28% (n = 19) of patients had a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).

Figure.

Patient selection.

Figure.

Patient selection.

Close modal
Table 1.

Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

Vancomycin Therapy and Associated MICs. The median dose of vancomycin was 60 mg/kg/day (IQR, 45–60 mg/kg/day), and the median duration of therapy was 11 days (IQR, 7–14 days) for the 55 patients who completed therapy in the hospital. Twelve patients were discharged home on vancomycin therapy. Twenty-nine patients (43%) initially received <60 mg/kg/day of vancomycin. Forty patients (60%) experienced vancomycin dosing changes following their initial dose and associated trough concentration, most of which (n = 36) involved increasing the dose. MRSA isolates for 64 episodes (96%) had an MIC of ≤0.5 mcg/mL (n = 11) or 1 mcg/mL (n = 53). Three isolates (4%) had an MIC of 2. For the 9 patients (13.4%) classified as treatment failure, the associated MIC values were as follows: ≤0.5 mg/L (n = 1), 1 mg/L (n = 7), and 2 mg/L (n = 1).

Vancomycin Treatment Failure. Nine of 67 (13.4%; 95% CI, 6%–22%) episodes of bacteremia were classified as vancomycin treatment failure. Six patients had persistent bacteremia ≥7 days while receiving vancomycin therapy, 2 had recurrence of bacteremia within 30 days of the end of vancomycin therapy, and 1 patient died within 30 days of MRSA isolation. Among the 6 patients with persistent bacteremia ≥7 days, 4 presented with a primary musculoskeletal infection requiring repeated incision and drainage procedures. Primary bacteremia and CLABSI were the other 2 sources associated with persistent bacteremia. In the latter, the CVC was removed, and linezolid was initiated after the patient was believed to have failed vancomycin therapy. The 2 patients who experienced recurrent bacteremia within 30 days both had a CLABSI. Of these, 1 patient had their original CVC removed followed by the removal of the replacement CVC after continued MRSA infection. The other patient received 16.5 days of continuous vancomycin therapy without removal of the CVC. The single patient who died within 30 days of infection onset presented with pneumonia and septic shock requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Six of the 9 patients (67%) who met treatment failure criteria were ≤2 years of age; however, larger studies are warranted to determine if there is clinical significance regarding this relationship.

Comparisons of Dose, Trough Concentrations, and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios. For the analysis of vancomycin trough concentrations and estimated AUC24/MIC ratios (Table 2), patients were grouped according to vancomycin daily dosing regimens of <60 mg/kg/day and ≥60 mg/kg/day. Fifteen patients (22%) experienced dose changes but did not have a new vancomycin trough concentration drawn appropriately. The median trough concentration for the 29 patients (43%) receiving <60 mg/kg/day of vancomycin was 11.9 mg/L (IQR, 7.6–15.6) compared with a median trough of 12.3 mg/L (IQR, 9.9–15.6, p = 0.1) for the 38 patients (57%) receiving ≥60 mg/kg/day. There were no differences in the proportion of patients achieving trough values in the 10 to 20 mg/L range (62% for <60 mg/kg/day versus 74% for ≥60 mg/kg/day, p = 0.6) or in the 15 to 20 mg/L range (35% for <60 mg/kg/day versus 26% for ≥60 mg/kg/day, p = 0.5).

Table 2.

Vancomycin Daily Dose and Corresponding Vancomycin Trough Concentrations and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios

Vancomycin Daily Dose and Corresponding Vancomycin Trough Concentrations and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios
Vancomycin Daily Dose and Corresponding Vancomycin Trough Concentrations and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios

The Chang18 and Le et al14 methods to estimate vancomycin clearance for determination of AUC24 yielded differing results for AUC24/MIC ratios. Six patients were not included in the analyses using the Chang18 method as no height was documented. The Chang18 method produced a broader range of AUC24/MIC ratio values than the Le et al14 method (Table 2). Median AUC24/MIC ratios for the 2 vancomycin dosing groups, using the Chang18 method, did not differ significantly [<60 mg/kg/day, 388 (IQR, 230–801); ≥60 mg/kg/day, 591 (IQR, 430–793); p = 0.1]; whereas, the medians did differ significantly using the Le et al14 method [<60 mg/kg/day, 456 (IQR, 288–576); ≥60 mg/kg/day, 609 (IQR, 483–727); p = 0.001)] (Table 2). There was a higher proportion of children with AUC24/MIC ratios ≥400 in the high dose versus the low dose group for both the Chang18 (84% versus 48%, p = 0.002) and the Le et al14 methods (100% versus 52%, p < 0.001). There was weak correlation between vancomycin trough concentrations and estimated AUC24/MIC ratios using both the Chang18 method (R2 = 0.32; p = 0.009) and the Le et al14 method (R2 = 0.22; p = 0.07).

Correlations With Treatment Success or Failure. Comparisons of vancomycin dose, trough concentrations, and estimated AUC24/MIC ratios between treatment successes and failures are shown in Table 3. There were no differences in the median daily dose or median trough concentrations between treatment successes and failures. In addition, the differences between the median estimated AUC24/MIC ratios were not significantly different between treatment successes and failures for either the Chang18 method [median AUC24/MIC ratio, 591 (IQR, 385–793) for successes compared with 245 (IQR, 90–728) for failures (p = 0.07)] or the Le et al14 method [median AUC24/MIC ratio, 540 (IQR, 446–681) for successes versus 523 (IQR, 250–772) for failures (p = 0.6)].

Table 3.

Correlation of Treatment Outcomes With Vancomycin Doses, Trough Concentrations, and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios

Correlation of Treatment Outcomes With Vancomycin Doses, Trough Concentrations, and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios
Correlation of Treatment Outcomes With Vancomycin Doses, Trough Concentrations, and Estimated AUC24/MIC Ratios

Our study estimates AUC24/MIC ratios and evaluates their relationship with not only vancomycin dose and trough concentrations, but also treatment outcomes in children with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report relationship of AUC24/MIC ratios, trough concentrations, vancomycin doses, and treatment outcomes in pediatric patients who have received vancomycin for a duration of therapy greater than 72 hours. Previous studies either partially assessed these relationships or included patients with vancomycin durations too short to attribute outcomes.1,2,4 We found that higher vancomycin doses, ≥60 mg/kg/day, were not associated with higher trough concentrations but were associated with higher median AUC24/MIC ratios. While the median estimated AUC24/MIC ratio was higher in patients receiving ≥60 mg/kg/day, using the Le et al14 method, we did not find a statistically significant difference between dosing groups using the Chang18 method.

While several studies have examined the relationship between vancomycin dosing and pharmacokinetics, the available data addressing clinical outcomes of invasive MRSA infections in children in relation to vancomycin dose and achievable trough concentrations are more limited.1,2,4,5,7,22 These studies have assessed a mix of healthcare-associated and community-acquired infections. In addition, there is no standard definition for treatment failure in children making comparisons across studies difficult.1,2,4,7,2325 We used a definition similar to that used in 3 pediatric studies.1,2,4 In the first, Welsh et al2 evaluated 22 children with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin for at least 5 days. Both community-acquired and healthcare-associated cases were included in their analysis. Treatment failure, which occurred in 50% of patients, included persistent bacteremia ≥7 days. They did not report dosing, trough concentrations, or AUC24/MIC ratios. The second study, by Hamdy et al,4 was a retrospective review of 232 episodes of MRSA bacteremia in which treatment failure was defined as persistent bacteremia >3 days. With this less stringent definition, treatment failure was documented in 35% of children (n = 174) who had a steady state trough concentration available within the first 3 days of therapy. In the third study, Hahn et al1 defined MRSA bacteremia ≥3 days as failure and evaluated 59 children receiving vancomycin for at least 3 days. Treatment failure was reported as 36% for patients with an AUC24/MIC ratio < 400 (n = 25) and 38% for those with a ratio ≥400 (n = 34). Yoo et al22 analyzed mortality in 46 cases of healthcare-associated MRSA bacteremia. All-cause mortality and recurrence of bacteremia in their study population were substantially higher than in our patient cohort at 11.1% and 15.2%, respectively, versus 1% and 3%. They concluded that initial vancomycin trough concentrations are not predictive of 30-day mortality or recurrent bacteremia in children. While we used a definition of treatment failure similar to the Welsh et al2 study, persistent bacteremia ≥7 days, community-acquired infections comprised the majority of episodes in our patients, which may explain the lower mortality and recurrence rates compared with nosocomial infections in these other studies. The lack of a standard definition of treatment failure clearly contributes to variability in treatment failure rates.

The Infectious Diseases Society of America11 recommends 60 mg/kg/day (15 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours) of vancomycin for the treatment of severe invasive MRSA infections in children and adults. Additionally, they consider 15 to 20 mg/L to be the target vancomycin trough concentration; however, this dose may not be sufficient to achieve target trough concentrations in children.3,11,13,26,27 In 1 study of 94 patients receiving vancomycin 60 mg/kg/day, fewer than 15% of patients achieved a trough concentration within the range of 15 to 20 mg/L.26 Chhim et al3 reported similar findings for 60 mg/kg/day dosing regimens with only 16.5% of patients (n = 102) achieving concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L, 43% of whom had concentrations <10 mg/L.3 Both Hamdy et al4 and Yoo et al22 concluded that initial vancomycin trough concentrations ≤10 mg/L were not predictive of vancomycin treatment failure although, in the Hamdy et al4 study, troughs <10 mg/L were associated with a longer duration of MRSA bacteremia.5 Our study further exposes difficulties in achieving trough concentrations above 15 mg/L in children and lack of association of trough concentrations with vancomycin dose and outcome of infection. While 74% of our patients receiving ≥60 mg/kg/day had a trough between 10 and 20 mg/L, only 26% achieved a trough of 15 to 20 mg/L. For patients receiving <60 mg/kg/day, 35% achieved a trough of 15 to 20 mg/L (p = 0.5).

In adults, treatment success appears to correlate best with an estimated AUC24/MIC ratio ≥400.810,12 Vancomycin troughs of 15 to 20 mg/L are suggested to increase the probability of achieving this target ratio.12,25 However, modeling studies suggest that lower vancomycin trough concentrations, which are more easily achieved, may produce ratios ≥400 in children.13,14 Frymoyer et al13 predicted that lower trough concentrations of 7 to 10 mg/L may achieve ratios ≥400 in children receiving 15 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours when the MIC is 1. AUC24/MIC ratios ≥400 were achieved via Monte Carlo simulation with trough concentrations of 8 to 9 mg/L in patients receiving vancomycin 60 to 70 mg/kg/day at varying dosing intervals.14 In a retrospective study of 40 children, a mean trough of 11 mg/L was associated with a mean AUC24/MIC ratio of 489.15 For our entire population, the median vancomycin trough concentration was 12.2 mg/L, and the median estimated AUC24/MIC ratio was 598 using the Chang18 method and 529 using the Le et al14 method to estimate vancomycin clearance. Correlation between trough concentration and estimated ratio was low, reinforcing that trough concentrations may be poor surrogates for AUC24/MIC ratios in children.

A major issue confounding all these studies is that AUC24 is being estimated rather than measured. Both the Le et al14 and Chang18 equations for vancomycin clearance were derived using population pharmacokinetic simulation. These methods are attractive as they do not require additional trough concentration monitoring; however, we question their use in clinical practice due to finding widely differing results for each method.6,14,18 Similarly, when Kishk et al6 determined AUC24/MIC ratios using 3 pharmacokinetic methods, trapezoidal, Chang,18 and Le et al,14 the likelihood of achieving an AUC24/MIC >400 varied from 16% to 91% depending on the method used. They concluded that the trapezoidal method (which required 2 trough values) had the highest correlation with trough concentrations (R2 = 0.59), and the Le et al14 method was most likely to produce ratios >400.6 In our analysis, we found that neither the Chang18 nor Le et al14 methods correlated well with trough levels (Chang18: R2 = 0.32; Le et al14: R2 = 0.22), similar to Kishk et al.6 This indicates a need for studies to prospectively validate the methods used to estimate vancomycin AUC24.

In the absence of a prospectively validated method for estimating vancomycin AUC24 practical for use in routine clinical practice, examining the association between vancomycin dose, trough concentration, and outcome of infection should be the best way to determine optimal vancomycin dosing for invasive MRSA infections. In our patient population, comprising entirely MRSA infections, we observed treatment failure in 13.4% of patients. Median daily vancomycin doses did not differ significantly between treatment failures and successes (56 versus 60 mg/kg/day, p = 0.8) nor did median vancomycin trough concentration (13.7 versus 11.8 mg/L, p = 0.24). Although the median AUC24/MIC ratio was greater for successes than for failures using the Chang18 method (591 versus 245), the difference was not significant and was not replicated using the Le et al14 method. This, again, highlights the problem of the validity of these equations and the difficulty of determining the optimal vancomycin dose in children to achieve treatment success while minimizing the risk of toxicity.

This study has several limitations as a result of its retrospective design. Although we reviewed 10 years of bacteremia episodes after exclusions, we were left with a relatively small sample (with few treatment failures), which limited the statistical power to detect differences between patient groups. We could not control timing of repeat cultures, which leads to inaccuracies in predicting duration of bacteremia. In addition, vancomycin trough concentrations were not always collected after changes in dosing, limiting our ability to assess the effect of the dose change. Additionally, attribution of treatment failure directly to antibiotic failure is fraught with uncertainty as there are factors outside of antibiotic therapy that contribute to treatment success such as source control. Source control is crucial to the successful treatment of many infection sites, such as CLABSIs and infections with abscess formation (complicated skin and soft tissue infections or bone and joint infections). Finally, we cannot assess the accuracy of AUC24 estimates as it is not routine practice in pediatrics to repeatedly measure vancomycin concentrations to accurately calculate AUC24.

Vancomycin treatment failure occurred in 13.4% of children in this study, a much lower rate than previously reported. Vancomycin trough concentrations did not correlate well with estimated AUC24/MIC ratios in our population of children with MRSA bacteremia no matter the method of AUC24 estimation. Vancomycin treatment failure was not associated with vancomycin daily dose, vancomycin trough concentration, or estimated AUC24/MIC ratios. Large prospective studies using standard definitions of treatment failure and repeated vancomycin trough measurements are needed to predict failure in children with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin. Methods to estimate vancomycin AUC24, such as those by Chang18 and Le et al,14 require validation of appropriate pharmacokinetic studies in children in order to be used in future studies.

Preliminary data presented at the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, IN on May 2, 2013.

AUC

area under the curve

AUC24

area under the curve at 24 hours

CLABSI

central line-associated bloodstream infection

CVC

central venous catheter

MIC

minimum inhibitory concentration

MRSA

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

1.
Hahn
A
,
Frenck
RW
,
Allen-Staat
M
,
et al
.
Evaluation of target attainment of vancomycin area under the curve in children with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
.
Ther Drug Monit
.
2015
;
37
(
5
):
619
625
.
2.
Welsh
KJ
,
Abbott
AN
,
Lewis
EM
,
et al
.
Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and microbiologic features associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in pediatric patients treated with vancomycin
.
J Clin Microbiol
.
2010
;
48
(
3
):
894
899
.
3.
Chhim
RF
,
Arnold
SR
,
Lee
KR.
Vancomycin dosing practices, trough concentrations, and predicted area under the curve in children with suspected invasive Staphylococcal infections
.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc
.
2013
;
2
(
3
):
259
262
.
4.
Hamdy
RF
,
Hsu
AJ
,
Stockman
C
,
et al
.
Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in children
.
Pediatrics
.
2017
;
139
(
6
):
e20170183
.
5.
Hsu
AJ
,
Hamdy
RF
,
Huang
Y
,
et al
.
Association between vancomycin trough concentrations and duration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in children
.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc
.
2017
:
00
(
00
):
1
4
.
6.
Kishk
OA
,
Lardieri
AB
,
Heil
EL
,
et al
.
Vancomycin AUC/MIC and corresponding troughs in a pediatric population
.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther
.
2017
;
22
(
1
):
41
47
.
7.
McNeil
JC
,
Kok
EY
,
Forbes
AR
,
et al
.
Healthcare-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in children: evidence for reverse vancomycin creep and impact of vancomycin trough values on outcome
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2016
;
35
(
3
):
263
268
.
8.
Moise-Broder
PA
,
Forrest
A
,
Birmingham
MC
,
et al
.
Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections
.
Clin Pharmacokinet
.
2004
;
43
(
13
):
925
942
.
9.
Brown
J
,
Brown
K
,
Forrest
A.
Vancomycin AUC24/MIC ratio in patients with complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus and its association with attributable mortality during hospitalization
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
.
2012
;
56
(
2
):
634
638
.
10.
Gawronski
KM
,
Goff
DA
,
Brown
J
,
et al
.
A stewardship program's retrospective evaluation of vancomycin AUC24/MIC and time to microbiological clearance in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis
.
Clin Ther
.
2013
;
35
(
6
):
772
779
.
11.
Liu
C
,
Bayer
A
,
Cosgrove
SE
,
et al
.
Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
2011
;
52
(
3
):
285
292
.
12.
Rybak
MJ
,
Lomaestro
BM
,
Rotschafer
JC
,
et al
.
Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adults summary of consensus recommendations from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists
.
Pharmacotherapy
.
2009
;
29
(
11
):
1275
1279
.
13.
Frymoyer
A
,
Guglielmo
BJ
,
Hersh
AL.
Desired vancomycin trough serum concentration for treating invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal infections
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2013
;
32
(
10
):
1077
1079
.
14.
Le
J
,
Bradley
JS
,
Murray
W
,
et al
.
Improved vancomycin dosing in children using area under the curve exposure
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2013
;
32
(
4
):
e155
e163
.
15.
Ploessel
C
,
White
C
,
Manasco
K.
Correlation of a vancomycin pharmacokinetic model and trough serum concentrations in pediatric patients
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2015
;
34
:
e244
e247
.
16.
Lanke
S
,
Yu
T
,
Rower
JE
,
et al
.
AUC-guided vancomycin in adolescent patients with suspected sepsis
.
J Clin Pharmacol
.
2017
;
57
(
1
):
77
84
.
17.
Hwang
D
,
Chiu
N
,
Chang
L
,
et al
.
Vancomycin dosing and target attainment in children
.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect
.
2017
;
50
(
4
):
494
499
.
18.
Chang
D.
Influence of malignancy on the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in infants and children
.
Pediatric Infect Dis J
.
1995
;
14
(
8
):
667
673
.
19.
Schwartz
GJ
,
Feld
LG
,
Langford
DJ.
A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in full-term infants during the first year of life
.
J Pediatr
.
1984
;
104
(
6
):
849
854
.
20.
Schwartz
GJ
,
Work
DF.
Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
.
2009
;
4
(
11
):
1832
643
.
21.
Schwartz
GJ
,
Brion
LP
,
Spitzer
A.
The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children, and adolescents
.
Pediatr Clin North Am
.
1987
;
34
(
3
):
571
590
22.
Yoo
RN
,
Kim
SH
,
Lee
J.
Impact of initial vancomycin trough concentration on clinical and micrological outcomes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in children
.
J Korean Med Sci
.
2017
;
32
:
22
28
.
23.
Lodise
TP
,
Graves
J
,
Evans
A
,
et al
.
Relationship between vancomycin MIC and failure among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia treated with vancomycin
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
.
2008
;
52
(
9
):
3315
3320
.
24.
Kullar
R
,
Davis
SL
,
Taylor
TN
,
et al
.
Effects of targeting higher vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes and costs in a matched patient cohort
.
Pharmacotherapy
.
2012
;
32
(
3
):
195
201
.
25.
Kullar
R
,
Davis
SL
,
Levine
DP
,
et al
.
Impact of vancomycin exposure on outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: support for consensus guidelines suggested targets
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
2011
;
52
(
8
):
975
981
.
26.
Frymoyer
A
,
Guglielmo
BJ
,
Wilson
SD
,
et al
.
Impact of a hospital-wide increase in empiric pediatric vancomycin dosing on initial trough concentrations
.
Pharmacotherapy
.
2011
;
31
(
9
):
871
876
.
27.
Eiland
LS
,
English
TM
,
Eiland
EH.
Assessment of vancomycin dosing and subsequent serum concentrations in pediatric patients
.
Ann Pharmacother
.
2011
;
45
(
5
):
582
589
.

Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria. The authors had full access to all the data and take responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis.

Author notes

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science (RBR, SSS, RFC, KRL), The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, Department of Pediatrics (SRA), The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital (RBR, SSS, RFC, SRA, KRL) Memphis, TN