The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act1  (BPCA) and the Pediatric Research Equity Act2  (PREA) are companion legislations enacted to improve pediatric labeling. BPCA has 2 sections, for on-patent and for off-patent drugs. The BPCA on-patent process provides an additional 6 months of marketing exclusivity to the pharmaceutical manufacturer/new drug application (NDA) holder in exchange for performance and submission of pediatric labeling studies. The off-patient process was delegated to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and then to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development3  (NICHD). The NICHD role consists of prioritization of drugs in need of improved labeling, performance of studies in accord with the Written Request negotiated with and issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and submission of those data to the FDA for consideration of labeling change. The purpose of this paper to talk about some of those labeling studies performed under the BPCA legislation by NICHD.

The NICHD, and the Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Branch, has developed and overseen the studies under BPCA for pediatric labeling. The complete listing of the off-patent labels developed by NIH/NICHD are available online.46 

Specific issues with pediatric clinical trials include: need for competent, trained pediatric clinical investigators and study staff familiar and comfortable in working with children and their families, need for minimally invasive procedures, small volume blood draws and potential development and expansion of dried blood spot analyses, maximal use of sparse sampling techniques, population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, age-appropriate study procedures and study endpoints, study procedures that are developed in consideration of the child (e.g., missed school) and the child’s family (e.g., missed work), and age-appropriate formulations. All clinical trial activities should be compliant with current Good Clinical Practice guidelines,7  making all results auditable by regulatory agencies, to be included in product labeling.

Neonates have been a particularly difficult population to study, for all of the above reasons as well as: medical frailty, conditions in neonates that occur only in neonates, and small blood volume for sampling. For reference, total blood volume is ∼ 80 mL/kg, or 40 mL in a 500 g premature neonate, 3% of which can be drawn over a 24-hour period, which translates to 1.2 mL. There is a pressing need for neonatal-appropriate clinical outcome measures. Pulmonary arterial hypertension would be a classic example, where the 6-minute walk test is the clinical outcome measure as a biomarker of pulmonary artery pressure in ambulatory patients, whereas in neonates an invasive pulmonary pressure is required. Incorporation of pediatric extrapolation principles simplified several of the clinical trials, eliminating the need to prove efficacy while requiring dosing and safety data.8 

A blinded, active comparator trial comparing lorazepam and diazepam for status epilepticus was performed, using exception from informed consent for the first time in children.9  In 273 children aged 3 months to 17 years of age from 11 US sites, “Cessation of status epilepticus for 10 minutes without recurrence within 30 minutes occurred in 101 of 140 (72.1%) in the diazepam group and 97 of 133 (72.9%) in the lorazepam group. Twenty-six patients in each group required assisted ventilation. There were no ­statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes except that lorazepam patients were more likely to be sedated.”10  These results have been incorporated into the evidence-based treatment guidelines of the American Epilepsy Society.11 

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lithium for bipolar I disorder in 81 children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years showed efficacy, as measured by improvement of the Youth Mania Rating Scale,12  in children randomly assigned to lithium compared with placebo. Overall Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores were also significantly better with lithium than placebo. Thyrotropin was increased in the lithium group, which is a known side effect of lithium treatment. The FDA label for lithium13  is available online.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, dose-ranging, effect-controlled multicenter study on the effects of sodium nitroprusside in pediatric patients requiring controlled hypotension was performed. The sodium nitroprusside trial14  demonstrated dose-dependent blood pressure reduction in 203 children less than 17 years of age who were randomized to 0.3, 1, 2 and 3 µg/kg/min. There were no measurable cyanide concentrations in the enrolled patients, which has been a safety concern as sodium nitroprusside is metabolized to cyanide. A starting infusion rate of 0.3 µg/kg/min appears reasonable.14  The sodium nitroprusside label15  is available online.

Neonates are newborns aged from birth to 28 days, and a full-term gestation is 40 weeks. Frequently, neonatal conditions are related to prematurity, some as young as 23 weeks. Premature infants have immature and/or poorly functioning organs; premature and immature kidneys and their liver cannot eliminate drugs as quickly as mature organs, leading to the delayed elimination of drugs cleared through those organs. The immature neonatal brain may not properly innervate the breathing center in the brainstem, leading to apnea of prematurity. The neonatal gut is prone to necrosis (necrotizing enterocolitis [NEC]), of unclear etiology but possibly related to infection. An immature immune system leads to systemic bacterial, viral, and fungal infections.

Associated issues include: how to do a PK study in a neonate weighing 500 g, how to minimize the blood volume removal, what kind of sampling strategy can be used (e.g., sparse sampling, use of scavenged blood/urine samples), and development of highly precise quantitative, reproducible assays capable of accommodating a very small volume of plasma (10–25 µL). As noted above, neonatal total blood volume is approximately 80 mL/kg, or 40 mL in a 500 g premature neonate, 3% of which can be drawn over a 24-hour period, which translates to 1.2 mL. Very small volume, less than 100 µL assays are therefore necessary for PK studies in neonates.

Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are often treated with many medications, most not FDA labeled for neonates, so doses are a best estimate. Several BPCA studies have addressed this question, leading to new labels for neonatal and infant dosing.

Our first neonatal study was for meropenem to treat complicated, or suspected, intra-abdominal infections (the labeled indication), leading to the first neonatal dosing recommendations in a label (see Table 1). Two hundred pre-term and term infants less than 91 days of age were enrolled from 24 NICUs.16  The safety question, seizure incidence, was resolved by data from a large data collection from NICUs, showing that meropenem was not associated with an increase in seizure frequency from baseline.17,18 

Table 1.

Recommended Meropenem for Injection Dosage Schedule for Pediatric Patients Less Than 1 Month of Age With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections and Normal Renal Function

Recommended Meropenem for Injection Dosage Schedule for Pediatric Patients Less Than 1 Month of Age With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections and Normal Renal Function
Recommended Meropenem for Injection Dosage Schedule for Pediatric Patients Less Than 1 Month of Age With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections and Normal Renal Function

PK sampling consisted of sparse sampling and scavenged samples (samples which were drawn for other purposes). An assay was developed for 50 µL of plasma.19  PK data were then analyzed and stratified by gestational age to develop dosing guidelines to achieve a time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for multiple neonatal ages. The meropenem label is available online.20 

Ampicillin is administered as standard of care for potentially infected neonates, which has lacked neonatal labeling for dosing in the premature neonate, and possible increased seizure frequency.

An opportunistic study design was used: enrolling 75 neonates who were already receiving ampicillin for clinical care, a PK sampling approach to minimize the volume of blood draws and to coincide with already-scheduled blood draws, and an assay using 10 µL plasma. A PK model was developed for gestational age groups to assure that the time above MIC (8 µg/mL for Escherichia coli) was greater than or equal to 90%.2124  The dosing regimens for ampicillin, now in the label,25  are in the Table 2. Using electronic health records, greater ampicillin exposure was associated with seizures.

Table 2.

Ampicillin Dosage in Neonates (Less Than or Equal to 28 Days of Postnatal Age) for Bacterial Meningitis and Septicemia

Ampicillin Dosage in Neonates (Less Than or Equal to 28 Days of Postnatal Age) for Bacterial Meningitis and Septicemia
Ampicillin Dosage in Neonates (Less Than or Equal to 28 Days of Postnatal Age) for Bacterial Meningitis and Septicemia

Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are life-threatening, and can cause long-term neurodevelopmental disability. Acyclovir is the drug of choice for treatment, but optimal dosing has been unknown. In a study of 28 infants less than 31 days postnatal age, a PK model was developed to achieve an acyclovir concentration greater than or equal to 3 µg/mL for greater than or equal to 50% of the dosing interval.26  Safety of acyclovir was assessed using electronic medical records, acyclovir exposure was not related to adverse events.27,28  The dosing guidelines for acyclovir are in the Table 3 and in the label,29  demonstrating the increase in clearance with gestational age.

Table 3.

Acyclovir Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Aged from Birth to 3 Months

Acyclovir Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Aged from Birth to 3 Months
Acyclovir Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Aged from Birth to 3 Months

Fluconazole, an antifungal agent, is used to treat premature neonates with suspected or confirmed fungal infections.30  Because there is a delay in achieving therapeutic fluconazole concentrations, a loading dose has been used in children and adults, but has not been tested or used in neonates and infants. Nine infants requiring antifungal treatment received a 25 mg/kg loading dose of fluconazole, and PK sampling was performed in 8 of the infants. Five infants achieved therapeutic concentrations on day 1 of dosing, and there were no safety signals.31  Recommended fluconazole dosing, from the updated label, is shown in Table 4.32 

Table 4.

Recommended Fluconazole Dosing ­Regimens for the Treatment of Systemic Candida Infections in Pediatric Patients

Recommended Fluconazole Dosing ­Regimens for the Treatment of Systemic Candida Infections in Pediatric Patients
Recommended Fluconazole Dosing ­Regimens for the Treatment of Systemic Candida Infections in Pediatric Patients

Clindamycin is an antibacterial agent commonly used to treat gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staph aureus) and anerobic infections, among others. Two studies were performed with clindamycin, in neonates and in children with obesity. Optimal dosing and safety in infants drove this study, along with a safety assessment. Clindamycin is metabolized by CYP3A4, and its clearance would be expected to be reduced in neonates and infants of a younger gestational age. A population PK study was performed in 62 infants with a median gestational age of 28 weeks and postnatal age less than or equal to 120 days, from 8 sites. Modeling and simulation, from PK data from three pediatric trials, provided dosing recommendations based on post-menstrual age to achieve an adequate concentration to treat methicillin-resistant Staph aureus.33,34  The updated clindamycin labeling for neonatal dosing is available in the label, and in Table 5 (below).35 

Table 5.

Predicted Drug Exposure (Mean ± SD) of Clindamycin in Adults and in Pediatric Patients with PMA ≤ 32 wk, or >32 to ≤ 40 wk

Predicted Drug Exposure (Mean ± SD) of Clindamycin in Adults and in Pediatric Patients with PMA ≤ 32 wk, or >32 to ≤ 40 wk
Predicted Drug Exposure (Mean ± SD) of Clindamycin in Adults and in Pediatric Patients with PMA ≤ 32 wk, or >32 to ≤ 40 wk

Obesity has become a major health problem globally, and a challenge to determine appropriate drug dosing. PK samples were collected from children already receiving clindamycin for a clinical indication (an opportunistic study). A virtual PK model was developed incorporating US demographic data, lab data from multiple studies, and organ size and blood flow estimates to predict volume and clearance changes in the obese pediatric population. Of note, the Schwartz equation was similar to the simulated GFR in the model. The upshot of this project was that the current dosing recommendations achieved desired drug concentrations in children with obesity.36 

The preciousness of these neonatal/pediatric resources, and the need to waste nothing in the course of these trials, is an ongoing theme. Embedded in these trials is clinical research/clinical trials training, so although one trial is being performed, clinical trials knowledge and infrastructure is being developed for future clinical trials. Training is also available through free on-line courses at the National Institutes of Health for clinical research (Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research)38  and clinical pharmacology (Principles of Clinical Pharmacology).39 

The ongoing problem of a lack of pediatric dosage forms has not been solved. Doing the math for a neonatal dose of meropenem (commercially available in 500 mg and 1 g vials), 20 mg/kg × 0.5 kg = 10 mg. For the pharmacist, this requires serial dilutions and an acute need for accuracy. The lack of swallowable and palatable oral dosage forms in the correct pediatric dose remains a problem, despite the statistic that many adults also have difficulty swallowing large tablets and capsules, leading to at-home dosage form modifications.37  The use of 3D printing, for smaller batches that tend not to be commercially viable, might be one technological solution. Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic agent, is the only 3D printed FDA approved, commercially available oral dosage form. Use of 3D printing to make isoleucine tablets for maple syrup urine disease produced tablets of various palatable round sizes, colors and flavors.40  Increasing use of 3D printing technologies could provide new opportunities in polymer chemistry, pharmaceutics, and engineering.41 

In summary, pediatric clinical trials sponsored by NICHD have improved pediatric labeling and the health of neonates and children. There is considerable room for improving swallowable, palatable dosage forms which will benefit children and adults.

AUC

area under the concentration-time curve;

BPCA

Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act;

Cmax

maximum concentration;

Cmin

minimum concentration;

CYP

cytochrome P450;

FDA

US Food and Drug Administration;

GA

gestational age;

IND

investigational new drug application;

MIC

minimum inhibitory concentration;

NDA

new drug application;

NEC

necrotizing enterocolitis;

NICHD

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development;

NICU

neonatal intensive care unit;

PK

pharmacokinetics;

PMA

post-menstrual age;

PNA

post-natal age;

PREA

Pediatric Research Equity Act

I would like to acknowledge the work of my colleague Perdita Taylor Zapata, MD, Program Director of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the editorial assistance of Rebecca Hwang.

3.
https://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/history/establishment (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and human Development, accessed 11/14/2024)
4.
https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/bpca/accomplishments (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and human Development, accessed 11/14/2024)
5.
https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/bpca/study-summaries (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and human Development, accessed 11/14/2024)
8.
Samuels
 
S
,
Park
 
K
,
Bhatt-Mehta
 
V
, et al.
Pediatric efficacy extrapolation in drug development submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration 2015–2020
.
J Clin Pharmacol
.
2023
;
63
(
3
):
307
313
.
9.
Holsti
 
M
,
Zemek
 
R
,
Baren
 
J
, et al.
Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered “Exception from Informed Consent” trial
.
Clin Trials
.
2015
;
12
(
1
):
67
76
.
10.
Chamberlain
 
JM
,
Okada
 
P
,
Holsti
 
M
, et al
;
Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)
.
Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA
.
2014
;
311
(
16
):
1652
1660
.
11.
Glauser
 
T
,
Shinnar
 
S
,
Gloss
 
D
, et al.
Evidence-based guideline: treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children and adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society
.
Epilepsy Curr
.
2016
;
16
(
1
):
48
61
.
12.
Findling
 
RL
,
Robb
 
A
,
McNamara
 
NK
, et al.
Lithium in the acute treatment of bipolar I disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
136
(
5
):
885
894
.
13.
Lithium Label: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/017812s031,018421s031,018558s026lbl.pdf (Food and Drug Administration, accessed 11/14/2024)
14.
Drover
 
DR
,
Hammer
 
GB
,
Barrett
 
JS
, et al.
Evaluation of sodium nitroprusside for controlled hypotension in children during surgery
.
Front Pharmacol
.
2015
;
6
:
136
.
15.
Sodium nitroprusside label: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=870b8428-3e48-40f5-9172-d962adc90dd5 (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Dailymed website of FDA labels, accessed 11/14/2024)
16.
Cohen-Wolkowiez
 
M
,
Poindexter
 
B
,
Bidegain
 
M
, et al.
;
Meropenem Study Team
.
Safety and effectiveness of meropenem in infants with suspected or complicated intra-abdominal infections
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
2012
;
55
(
11
):
1495
1502
.
17.
Hornik
 
CP
,
Herring
 
AH
,
Benjamin
 
DK
, et al;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act-Pediatric Trials Network
.
Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2013
;
32
(
7
):
748
753
.
18.
Ganguly
 
S
,
Edginton
 
AN
,
Gerhart
 
JG
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act-Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
.
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of meropenem in preterm and term infants
.
Clin Pharmacokinet
.
2021
;
60
(
12
):
1591
1604
.
19.
Cohen-Wolkowiez
 
M
,
White
 
NR
,
Bridges
 
A
, et al.
Development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay of six antimicrobials in plasma for pharmacokinetic studies in premature infants
.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci
.
2011
;
879
(
30
):
3497
506
.
20.
Meropenem label: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=31dd2160-7dbd-51fa-e054-00144ff88e88#S1.2 (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Dailymed website of FDA labels, accessed 11/14/2024)
21.
Tremoulet
 
A
,
Le
 
J
,
Poindexter
 
B
, et al
;
Administrative Core Committee of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act-Pediatric Trials Network
.
Characterization of the population pharmacokinetics of ampicillin in neonates using an opportunistic study design
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
.
2014
;
58
(
6
):
3013
3020
.
22.
Le
 
J
,
Greenberg
 
RG
,
Yoo
 
Y
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act – Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
.
Ampicillin dosing in premature infants for early-onset sepsis: exposure-driven efficacy, safety, and stewardship
.
J Perinatol
.
2022
;
42
(
7
):
959
964
.
23.
Hornik
 
CP
,
Benjamin
 
DK
,
Smith
 
PB
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act—Pediatric Trials Network
.
Electronic health records and pharmacokinetic modeling to assess the relationship between ampicillin exposure and seizure risk in neonates
.
J Pediatr
.
2016
;
178
:
125
129.e1
.
24.
Le
 
J
,
Poindexter
 
B
,
Sullivan
 
JE
, et al.
Comparative analysis of ampicillin plasma and dried blood spot pharmacokinetics in neonates
.
Ther Drug Monit
.
2018
;
40
(
1
):
103
108
.
25.
Ampicillin label: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=67dd2930-8482-4da5-b663-b751aff18c61#:∼:text=Ampicillin%20is%20the%20least%20serum,many%20weeks%20without%20adverse%20reactions. (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Dailymed website of FDA labels, accessed 11/14/2024)
26.
Sampson
 
MR
,
Bloom
 
BT
,
Lenfestey
 
RW
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network
.
Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous acyclovir in preterm and term infants
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2014
;
33
(
1
):
42
49
.
27.
Ericson
 
JE
,
Gostelow
 
M
,
Autmizguine
 
J
, et al
;
Pediatric Trials Network Executive Committee and Investigators
.
Safety of high-dose acyclovir in infants with suspected and confirmed neonatal herpes simplex virus infections
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2017
;
36
(
4
):
369
373
.
28.
Ericson
 
JE
,
Benjamin
 
DK
,
Boakye-Agyeman
 
F
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act - Pediatric Trials Network
.
Exposure-safety relationship for acyclovir in the treatment of neonatal herpes simplex virus disease
.
Early Hum Dev
.
2022
;
170
:
105616
.
29.
Acyclovir label: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=cb64dfab-52ee-4312-bc9c-c3d04efe9109 (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Dailymed website of FDA labels, accessed 11/14/2024)
30.
Piper
 
L
,
Smith
 
PB
,
Hornik
 
CP
, et al.
Fluconazole loading dose pharmacokinetics and safety in infants
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2011
;
30
(
5
):
375
378
.
31.
Turner
 
K
,
Manzoni
 
P
,
Benjamin
 
DK
, et al.
Fluconazole pharmacokinetics and safety in premature infants
.
Curr Med Chem
.
2012
;
19
(
27
):
4617
4620
.
32.
Fluconazole label: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=cd24a261-9c15-42b4-8040-89d2dbda174e#i4i_dosage_admin_id_inv-eda05601-3981-4fee-b126-05ee66521b2a (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Dailymed website of FDA labels, accessed 11/14/2024)
33.
Gonzalez
 
D
,
Delmore
 
P
,
Bloom
 
BT
, et al.
Clindamycin pharmacokinetics and safety in preterm and term infants
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
.
2016
;
60
(
5
):
2888
2894
.
34.
Gonzalez
 
D
,
Melloni
 
C
,
Yogev
 
R
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act – Pediatric Trials Network Administrative Core Committee
.
Use of opportunistic clinical data and a population pharmacokinetic model to support dosing of clindamycin for premature infants to adolescents
.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
.
2014
;
96
(
4
):
429
437
.
35.
Clindamycin label: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/050441s086,050639s043lbl.pdf (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Dailymed website of FDA labels, accessed 11/14/2024)
36.
Gerhart
 
JG
,
Carreño
 
FO
,
Edginton
 
AN
, et al
;
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act—Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
.
Development and evaluation of a virtual population of children with obesity for physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling
.
Clin Pharmacokinet
.
2022
;
61
(
2
):
307
320
.
37.
Mc Gillicuddy
 
A
,
Crean
 
AM
,
Sahm
 
LJ
.
Older adults with difficulty swallowing oral medicines: a systematic review of the literature
.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
.
2016
;
72
(
2
):
141
151
.
38.
https://ocreco.od.nih.gov/courses/ippcr.html (Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research online course, accessed 11/19.2024)
39.
https://ocreco.od.nih.gov/courses/principles-clinical-pharmacology.html Principles of Clinical Pharmacology online course, accessed 11/19/2024)
40.
Goyanes
 
A
,
Madla
 
CM
,
Umerji
 
A
, et al.
Automated therapy preparation of isoleucine formulations using 3D printing for the treatment of MSUD: first single-centre, prospective, crossover study in patients
.
Int J Pharm
.
2019
;
567
:
118497
.
41.
Carou-Senra
 
P
,
Rodríguez-Pombo
 
L
,
Awad
 
A
, et al.
Inkjet printing of pharmaceuticals
.
Adv Mater
.
2024
;
36
(
11
):
e2309164
.

Disclosures. Anne Zajicek, MD, PharmD has retired from the National Institutes of Health effective July 31, 2024. The author declares no conflicts or financial interest in any product mentioned in the manuscript. The opinions stated are those of the author, and are not representative of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the US Government.