Efficacy of disinfectants used in veterinary, wildlife, and environmental settings were tested on Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola, the cause of snake fungal disease. Bleach and several common household cleaners are effective disinfectants; chlorhexidine, Simple Green, and spectricide were not. This information can be used to prevent transmission of this fungus between snakes.

Snake fungal disease caused by Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola, a keratinophilic fungus, infects snakes as a primary pathogen (Allender et al. 2015b). It was first observed in 2006 in timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) (Clark et al. 2011) and in 2008 in eastern massasaugas (Sistrurus catenatus; Allender et al. 2011). This fungus causes dermal infections in captive and wild snakes (Allender et al. 2015b). Clinical signs include skin swelling, crusts, and nodules of the skin (Allender et al. 2011, 2015b). The mode of transmission is unknown, but is speculated to occur with direct contact between individuals or with the contaminated environment (Allender et al. 2015b).

There are no current protocols for disinfecting equipment used in the field, in the laboratory, and in animal husbandry facilities for this fungus. Protocols established for other pathogens threatening reptiles and amphibians, such as ranaviruses (Bryan et al. 2009) and Batrachochytrium (Johnson et al. 2003), have not been evaluated for Ophidiomyces. A simple disinfection protocol for the inhibition of O. ophiodiicola is necessary in field and laboratory settings to prevent transmission of fungal spores that may lead to disease. We tested the efficacy of several disinfectants in free-ranging reptile and amphibian protocols.

An isolate of O. ophiodiicola was cultured in 2013 from the face of an eastern massasauga, confirmed morphologically and by 18S rRNA sequencing and quantitative PCR (Allender et al. 2015a). Cultures were propagated at room temperature (20 C) on potato dextrose agar slants (Remel, Thermo Scientific, Lenexa, Kansas, USA). Spores were scraped from the slants and suspended in 10 mL sterile saline, filtered with sterile glass wool in a funnel under vacuum, and diluted to a turbidity of 1 McFarland. Plate counts with saline averaged 541,600 colony-forming units/mL in the 1 McFarland suspension. We added 100 μL of the filtrate to 100 μL of 11 disinfectants (Table 1). After 0.5-, 2-, 5-, and/or 10-min exposures, the mixture was centrifuged at 5 × G for 10 min and all but 20 μL of the disinfectant was removed. Each sample was resuspended in 380 μL of saline. Serial dilutions were made to obtain five final dilutions of 1:20 to 1:200 that would result in 30–300 colonies for the untreated saline control following 10–14 d of incubation (data not shown).

Table 1.

Disinfectants used to test inactivation of Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola in vitro.

Disinfectants used to test inactivation of Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola in vitro.
Disinfectants used to test inactivation of Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola in vitro.

One hundred microliters of each dilution were spiral plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar Emmons plates (Remel) using a T-spreader and incubated at room temperature. Disinfectants were evaluated along with a sterile saline positive control to determine the number of colony-forming units present in each disinfectant treatment compared to no disinfectant. All procedures for treatment and control were performed in triplicate and results averaged (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of average Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola colony forming units between days 10 and 14 for each disinfectant at five dilutions of spores after exposure to respective disinfectant. Disinfectants without a specified time were tested at 10 min.

Summary of average Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola colony forming units between days 10 and 14 for each disinfectant at five dilutions of spores after exposure to respective disinfectant. Disinfectants without a specified time were tested at 10 min.
Summary of average Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola colony forming units between days 10 and 14 for each disinfectant at five dilutions of spores after exposure to respective disinfectant. Disinfectants without a specified time were tested at 10 min.
a

TNTC = too numerous to count.

Several products resulted in 100% inactivation of Ophidiomyces in vitro, but there were time-dependent relationships for many of the trials. Disinfectants were chosen based on availability and common use in similar studies. Based on preliminary data we used 3% bleach as a starting point; lower concentrations might still be effective in field settings, but were not tested. The fungus was sensitive to disinfectants that may be good alternatives for laboratory and veterinary applications. Lysol products, CLR, and 409 (vendors provided in Table 1) are ready-to-use disinfectants and are easily accessible as common household cleaners. Process NPD, a germicidal detergent used for broad antimicrobial disinfection, is practical in laboratory settings.

Bleach was effective at inactivating Ophidiomyces and is commonly used in the field. Equipment can be cleaned and disinfected to prevent spread of the fungus between individuals using either a 3% or 10% solution at 2-, 5-, and 10-min contact times. Because ranaviruses and chytrid fungi are effectively inactivated with concentrations of bleach lower than those tested in this study, the use of bleach at these concentrations will be effective at disinfecting all three pathogens (Table 2). Including bleach in shoe-washing stations for visitors has merit in high-risk areas and may prevent spread of the fungus. Care must be taken as even 3% bleach is corrosive and irritating to skin. Quaternary ammonia products (NPD) were as effective as bleach when used at 10 min and are less corrosive.

Three products were ineffective against Ophidiomyces even with a 10-min contact time. Chlorhexidine, a bactericide and virucide, is frequently used in veterinary settings because of its spectrum of activity and low risk of adverse effects (Zoetis 2015). Chlorhexidine decreased fungal growth but did not prevent it. Simple Green, promoted to be an environmentally safe disinfectant, was also not efficacious. Colony counts were lower than with both saline and chlorhexidine, but growth was not inhibited at even the lowest dilution of spores. Spectracide, a product intended for residential purposes, did not inhibit growth even at the higher concentration suggested for tree and shrub care. The active ingredient, propiconazole, was registered in 1981 and is used as an antifungal in landscape and agricultural settings (EPA 2006). In 2006, the US Environmental Protection Agency approved it for disease control in crops such as vegetables, berries, tree nuts, cereals, and grains (EPA 2006). While its use and relationship to the emergence of snake fungal disease cannot be determined, future studies should investigate the role that environmental use of this and other fungicides has on O. ophiodiicola.

We only tested spores, and while unlikely, the hyphae may be resistant to these methods. Studies of the effect on hyphae and of the presence of organic debris in field settings are needed.

In conclusion, a 2-min exposure to at least 3% bleach or 70% ethanol or a 10-min exposure to 0.16% Roccal, Lysol products, CLR, NPD, or 409 are recommended for disinfection of O. ophiodiicola. Furthermore, in areas that may have risk of chytrid or ranavirus exposure, at least 3% bleach is recommended. We recommend mud or leaf litter be removed from shoes and field equipment before application of disinfectant to ensure adequate exposure to bleach. These methods should reduce the spread of this often-fatal disease in free-ranging and captive snakes, but much work is still needed.

Funding for this project was provided through a Competitive State Wildlife Grant from the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Allender
MC,
Baker
S,
Wylie
D,
Loper
D,
Dreslik
MJ,
Phillips
CA,
Maddox
C,
Driskell
EA.
2015
a
.
Development of snake fungal disease after experimental challenge with Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola in cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorous)
.
PLoS One
10
:
e0140193
.
Allender
MC,
Dreslik
M,
Wylie
S,
Phillips
C,
Wylie
DB,
Maddox
C,
Delaney
MA,
Kinsel
MJ.
2011
.
Chrysosporium sp. infection in eastern massasauga rattlesnakes [letter]
.
Emerg Infect Dis
17
:
2383
2384
.
Allender
MC,
Raudabaugh
D,
Gleason
F,
Miller
A.
2015
b
.
The natural history, ecology, and epidemiology of Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola and its potential impact on free-ranging snake populations
.
Fungal Ecol
17
:
187
196
.
Bryan
LK,
Baldwin
CA,
Gray
MJ,
Miller
DL.
2009
.
Efficacy of select disinfectants at inactivating Ranavirus
.
Dis Aquat Org
84
:
89
94
.
Clark
RW,
Marchand
MN,
Clifford
BJ,
Stechert
R,
Stephens
S.
2011
.
Decline of an isolated timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus) population: Interactions between climate change, disease, and loss of genetic diversity
.
Biol Conserv
144
:
886
891
.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
.
2006
.
Reregistration eligibility decision: Propiconazole
(July 2006).
.
Johnson
ML,
Berger
L,
Philips
L,
Speare
R.
2003
.
Fungicidal effects of chemical disinfectants, UV light, desiccation, and heat on the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
.
Dis Aquat Org
57
:
255
260
.
Zoetis
.
2015
.
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
.
Nolvasan
. .