Stigma may negatively affect the treatment of people with mental illness, and pharmacists have the opportunity to play a key role in reducing mental health stigma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a pharmacy student–focused educational intervention impacts stigma toward people with mental illness.
A 90-minute interactive learning module, which used social media and fictional case scenarios, was developed and administered to third-year pharmacy students (n = 145) during small group class sessions. The Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), a validated tool to measure stigma, was administered immediately before and after the intervention. Pre-post OMS-HC scores were analyzed using related samples t tests.
A total of 93 presurvey and postsurvey OMS-HC scores were paired and analyzed. Based on the 15-item version of the scale, stigma was significantly reduced, consistent with a score reduction of 4.6%, from 36.8 (95% confidence interval, 35.4-38.1) to 35.1 (95% confidence interval, 33.8-36.3), P < .0001.
Educational interventions for pharmacy students that use social media applications might reduce mental health stigma. After the intervention, most participants believed that stigma impacts the treatment of mental illness, and that pharmacists may play a role in changing mental health stigma.
In 2015, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health1 reported that approximately 43.4 million adults (17.9%) in the United States were identified as having a mental illness, excluding substance use disorders, in the previous year. However, only 41% of US adults with a mental illness used mental health services within the past year.2 Among those adults with serious illness, 63% used mental health services.2 One factor that could delay help-seeking includes perceived stigma of mental illnesses. Social stigma is characterized by any discriminatory attitudes or behaviors directed toward persons with mental illnesses as a result of the label placed upon them. Perceived stigma relates to the internalization of this prejudice by a person with mental illness.3 Stigmatizing beliefs can be found in any environment, including the health care system.4 Perceived stigma in this setting can create distrust between patients and health care workers, which in turn may lead to poorer treatment outcomes.
Pharmacists can provide support services for patients with mental disorders, but the level of care often depends on the relationship between pharmacist and the patient. Murphy et al5 reported that people with a history of mental illness have expressed desire for more support from pharmacists in decision-making for treatment, as well as general support for their health and wellness. However, in a recent survey at our institution, many third- and fourth-year pharmacy students reported feeling unprepared to communicate with patients with mental illness. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to provide an opportunity for third professional year (P3) students to discuss mental health. This intervention used elements from the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) 2013 Educational Outcomes6 to emphasize the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed for effective pharmacy practice. With appropriate training, pharmacists may play a key role in reducing the stigma of mental illnesses.
In an effort to appeal to the current generation of student pharmacists, this intervention used items from several social media platforms. The integration of social media into medical education has been explored in the past, but its use remains controversial. Health educators may be hesitant to incorporate social media content into their teaching practice because of the lack of evidence that supports its efficacy and their concern for upholding the level of professionalism that is expected of health care leaders.7,8 Positive research findings may encourage pharmacy educators to incorporate more social media resources into their teaching practice.
The objectives of this study were (1) to assess pharmacy students' beliefs about (a) the effect of stigma in the treatment of mental health and (b) the role of pharmacists in reducing mental illness stigma; and (2) to determine whether an antistigma intervention using social media (a) reduces stigmatizing attitudes toward mental disorders or treating people with mental disorders, (b) improves beliefs about disclosing information about mental health or seeking help for mental illnesses, and (c) reduces social distancing from people with mental disorders.
A 90-minute intervention was developed and implemented at our institution. All participants were P3 pharmacy students enrolled in the Comprehensive Disease Management course seminar. All students had previously taken a Behavioral/Educational Interventions course in their first professional year but had not completed the psychiatric disorders lecture series. The participants were divided into 9 sections with an average of 16 students in each section. Each section was facilitated by a pharmacist affiliated with the Northeastern University School of Pharmacy.
Prior to their seminar class, students downloaded a document from the course Blackboard portal that contained instructions for the intervention. The facilitators were provided with a separate document containing the student version of the assignment, along with instructor guidance and “key questions” for the discussion. Prior to the intervention, an online presurvey was administered to assess the students' perceived stigma associated with mental illness. The intervention was divided into 3 activities (Table 1). Activities 1, 2, and 3 used a Buzzfeed video,9 a Reddit discussion thread,10 and an AsapSCIENCE video,11 respectively, to generate discussion about mental health stigma. At the completion of all 3 activities, participants were asked to complete the postsurvey. This intervention was developed in collaboration with the psychiatric course content expert, who provided both the didactic class series and associated weekly seminar cases. This study was approved by the human subjects Institutional Review Board at Northeastern University.
The online, password-protected surveys were administered through Qualtrics (Provo, UT), the University's preferred survey platform. Each student was given the opportunity to participate or to opt out of each survey. Students created a unique identifier that preserved the anonymity of the student but allowed the researchers to track the progress of each participant. Demographic information was intentionally not collected to preserve anonymity and to avoid overgeneralization of groups who hold stigmatizing beliefs.
The surveys assessed students' stigma using the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers Questionnaire (OMS-HC).12 The OMS-HC was previously validated by Modgill et al,13 who found it had acceptable internal consistency and may detect positive changes in antistigma interventions.13 The OMS-HC consists of 20 statements related to the stigmatization of mental illness. Survey responses were captured for each statement using a 5-point Likert scale that assessed the respondent's degree of agreement or disagreement. Each response was graded according to the strength of its stigma; the higher the score, the higher the degree of stigma. According to the analysis by Modgill et al13 of the OMS-HC, 15 statements from the original OMS-HC best measured changes in stigma, and these 15 statements could be divided into 3 subcategories: attitudes, disclosure/help-seeking, and social distancing. The primary outcome of this study was the 15-item OMS-HC score. Related samples t tests were used to compare stigma scores preintervention and postintervention.
All 20 OMS-HC statements were directly incorporated into the presurvey and postsurvey, without any modifications. In addition to the OMS-HC, the postsurvey included a 2-part, open-response reflection: What role does stigma have in the treatment of mental health, if any? What role do pharmacists have in changing the mental health stigma, if any? For the first part of the reflection, responses were interpreted and categorized as either “stigma impacts the treatment of mental health” or “other.” For the second part of the reflection, each response was analyzed and matched to a corresponding CAPE 2013 Educational Outcome (Table 2).6
Among the 145 students who participated in the activities, 89.0% (n = 129) and 78.6% (n = 114) fully completed the presurvey and postsurvey. Additionally, 64.1% (n = 93) of the scores were able to be paired and analyzed. A total of 15 scores were unable to be paired because of duplicate participant identifiers; another 6 scores were unable to be paired because those participants did not fully complete both surveys. Overall, mental health stigma significantly decreased for the class, and the 15-item OMS-HC survey scores showed a significant reduction in stigma of 4.6%, from 36.8 (95% confidence interval, 35.4-38.1) to 35.1 (95% confidence interval, 33.8-36.3), P < .0001. Stigma significantly decreased according to the attitudes and disclosure/help-seeking subcategories, but not the social distancing subcategory (Table 3).
Of the 114 participants who completed the postsurvey, 102 participants provided a response to the reflection question about the role of stigma in mental health and the pharmacist's role in changing the stigma (Table 2). Eighty-two of these students reported that stigma impacts the treatment of mental health. There were 85 participants who affirmed that pharmacists should have an active role in reducing mental health stigma, whereas 4 participants did not believe that pharmacists were qualified to minimize stigma.
This study showed that a brief, social media–focused, antistigma intervention for pharmacy students may reduce their stigma of mental health disorders. Most students agreed that stigma has a significant impact on the treatment of mental health, with substantial implications on patient quality of life. From the perspective of the patient, stigma can deter one from seeking treatment for mental illness, for reasons such as fear of being discriminated against by providers, fear of being perceived as weak by friends or family, and/or not seeing their illness as a real medical condition. From the perspective of the health care provider, stigma may affect quality of care and the relationships between the patient and the provider. Pharmacy students identified a key role of the pharmacist to support initiatives that reduce social stigma and stigma perceived by persons with mental illness.
Our intervention effectively reduced OMS-HC scores for the stigma subcategories of attitude and disclosure/help-seeking but not social distancing domains. This disparity is consistent with other antistigma interventions for pharmacy students14,15 and with the analysis by Modgill et al13 of the OMS-HC. Modgill et al proposed that this was because most antistigma interventions, including the one described here, do not focus specifically on reducing social distancing. To attempt to reduce social distancing, future antistigma interventions should explicitly include messages such as, Developing relationships with people with mental illnesses may benefit both parties, or Avoiding relationships with people with mental illness is harmful.
This study adds to the collection of successful antistigma interventions found in pharmacy literature.14-18 The intervention discussed here is unique because it took place during one seminar class, divided students into groups, and was solely focused on stigma. The smaller group size allowed participants to feel more comfortable discussing sensitive topics, such as mental illness, and the separation of this intervention from the classroom lecture allowed for maximal time efficiency. The facilitators were valuable to the intervention because they brought experience from their own pharmacy practices to the discussion.
Another unique aspect of this intervention was the incorporation of social media content. Social media can be a powerful resource in an educational setting for any age range, but particularly for this current generation of students, who developed alongside social media technology.19 Clauson et al20 surveyed first-year pharmacy students in 2013 and found that 75% of the respondents indicated that the integration of social media into their education would positively impact their learning ability. Similarly, El Bialy and Jalali21 surveyed medical students and educators and found that 95% of the educators and 70% of the students believed that social networking sites enhanced the learning experience. The Internet offers unlimited access to any student who requires supplemental information, and social media platforms like Buzzfeed9 or Reddit10 are able to offer content that is relatable to this generation of students and can enhance the students' learning experience.
There were several limitations to this study. First, each group in this study had students and facilitators with varying experiences, knowledge of mental illness, and readiness to talk about mental health. To increase the consistency of the discussion across the groups, a comprehensive guidance document was provided to each seminar facilitator. Second, response bias may have affected participants' answers to the OMS-HC or reflection questions. To minimize social desirability bias, the survey was anonymous, and confidentiality was reassured in the beginning of the survey. Because no demographic information was collected, the generalizability of the results to other pharmacy students is limited. Third, the postsurvey was conducted immediately at the end of the intervention. Evidence of long-term effects is scarce in the current literature, so similar studies should follow up with participants after extended periods of time. Finally, there was no control group, so the results of this study may not necessarily be attributable to the unique aspects discussed. More research is needed to support the use of social media in education, and future studies should compare lengthier, comprehensive interventions to shorter interventions focused on stigma.
To provide professional, culturally sensitive care, pharmacists should reflect on their skills, attitudes, and beliefs of mental health treatment and actively participate in changing the stigma of mental illnesses. Brief interventions for pharmacy students that use social media applications, which are relatable to current-generation pharmacy students, might reduce negative attitudes toward mental illness and increase readiness to seek help for a mental illness. The generalizability of the results of this study are limited to P3 pharmacy students who have not completed a psychiatric disorders course module. Future antistigma interventions should especially focus on reducing the social distancing aspect of mental health stigma.
2Graduate Pharmacist, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
Disclosures: The authors have no conflict of interest or other disclosures to acknowledge.