Repression sometimes can lead to greater movement mobilization: repressive events that are perceived as unjust have the potential to generate enormous public outrage against those seen as responsible. One result of repression-backfire-can contribute to the understanding of the conditions under which some repressive events may become transformative for social movements. Three case studies that highlight the processes involved in backfire are examined: the 1930 Salt March in India, in particular the beatings at Dharasana, that mobilized popular support for independence; the 1991 massacre in Dili, East Timor, which stimulated a massive expansion in international support for East Timorese independence; and the arrest of alternative cancer therapist John Richardson in 1972, which led to a huge growth in the U.S. movement for alternative therapies. The cases generate a preliminary understanding of the potential scope of backfire, the processes involved in backfire, and new hypotheses.
Research Article| August 04 2006
Repression, Backfire, and The Theory of Transformative Events
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2006) 11 (2): 249–267.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
David Hess, Brian Martin; Repression, Backfire, and The Theory of Transformative Events. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 June 2006; 11 (2): 249–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.11.2.3204855020732v63
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
Citing articles via
THE RISE OF A TRANSNATIONAL MOVEMENT TO PROTECT PRIVACY
Emilio Lehoucq, Sidney Tarrow