The disciplinary insurgency that created the academic field of social movement studies distinguished dissent from crime. This dichotomy has led the field to ignore the relation between the repression of dissent and the control of "ordinary" crime. There was massive repression in the wake of the Black riots of the 1960s that did not abate when the riots abated. The acceleration of the mass incarceration of African Americans in the United States after 1980 suggests the possibility that crime control and especially the drug war have had the consequence of repressing dissent among the poor. Social movement scholars have failed to recognize these trends as repression because of the theoretical turn that built too strong a conceptual wall between crime and dissent. Revisiting this dichotomy is essential for understanding repression today.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 February 2008
Research Article|
July 02 2008
Repression and Crime Control: Why Social Movement Scholars Should Pay Attention to Mass Incarceration as a Form of Repression
Pamela Oliver
Pamela Oliver
1
Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1393
Search for other works by this author on:
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2008) 13 (1): 1–24.
Citation
Pamela Oliver; Repression and Crime Control: Why Social Movement Scholars Should Pay Attention to Mass Incarceration as a Form of Repression. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 February 2008; 13 (1): 1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.13.1.v264hx580h486641
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
100
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
BOOK REVIEWS
Elizabeth Borland, Dana M. Moss, Nicholas Toloudis, John Thomas, III, Anna Zhelnina, Wilson Sherwin, Yifat Gutman, Amy Austin Holmes, Alejandro Ciordia