Although episodes of contentious politics in undemocratic regimes constitute the lion's share of contentious political events worldwide, the theorizing of political opportunity structures is based largely on contentious episodes in democratic/liberal political settings. This anomaly hampers recent attempts to redefine the boundaries among episodes of contention across time and place. Employing the case of the first Palestinian Intifada (1987-1992), I critically examine three theoretical aspects of political opportunity structures (POS): (1) how the link between POS, strateg, and tactics is forged; (2) how different levels of POS interact; and (3) the ability of multiactor movements to cope with the shifting nature of POS. I conclude by briefly illustrating the relevance of my findings to other structurally similar cases, and discuss the implications of my analysis for further sensitization of the Dynamics of Contention research program.
Mobilizing Under the Gun: Theorizing Political Opportunity Structure in a Highly Repressive Setting
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Eitan Alimi; Mobilizing Under the Gun: Theorizing Political Opportunity Structure in a Highly Repressive Setting. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 June 2009; 14 (2): 219–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.14.2.u210745765568737
Download citation file: