Research on antisweatshop mobilizations and labor-organizing campaigns in the countries of the global South has shown that under the pressure of transnational advocacy networks, notably NGOs and trade unions, US brands and retailers intervene in labor conflicts in their outsourced factories, in order to escape shaming campaigns. However, little attention has been paid to the responses of local employers to the emergence of labor organizations in their factories, partly as a result of these campaigns. This article, based on a two-year fieldwork project in the Guatemalan apparel sector, shows how the local managers of this industry manage to reconcile the demands of brands with the continuation of repressive labor control in the workplace by means of “concealed repression”; namely, preventive strategies, subtle antiunion discrimination, “opportune inaction,” and deliberate illicit transactions involving state officials.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 September 2015
Research Article|
September 01 2015
Concealed Repressions: Labor Organizing Campaigns and Antiunion Practices in the Apparel Industry of Guatemala*
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2015) 20 (3): 325–344.
Citation
Quentin Delpech; Concealed Repressions: Labor Organizing Campaigns and Antiunion Practices in the Apparel Industry of Guatemala. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 September 2015; 20 (3): 325–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-3-325
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
12
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
BOOK REVIEWS
Elizabeth Borland, Dana M. Moss, Nicholas Toloudis, John Thomas, III, Anna Zhelnina, Wilson Sherwin, Yifat Gutman, Amy Austin Holmes, Alejandro Ciordia