Social movement scholars have considered several political and cultural consequences of social movements, but have paid limited attention to whether and how social movements shape discourse. We develop a theory of discursive eruption, referring to the ability of radical movements to initially ignite media coverage but not control the content once other actors— particularly those that can take advantage of journalistic norms—enter the discourse. We hold that one long-term outcome of radical social movements is the ability to alter discursive fields through mechanisms such as increasing the salience and content of movement-based issues. We examine the way movements shape discourse by focusing on newspaper articles about inequality before, during, and after the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement. We analyze changes in the salience and content of coverage as well as shifts in actor standing and influence. Using 7,024 articles from eight newspapers, we find that the OWS movement increased media attention to inequality, shifting the focus of the discourse toward movement-based issue areas (e.g., the middle class and minimum wage). Further, we find that compared to the pre-OWS period, the influence of social movement organizations and think tanks rose in discourse on inequality. In addition, the discourse on inequality became more highly politicized as a result of the Occupy movement. These findings highlight the importance of social movements in shaping discourse and indicate that social movement scholars should further consider discursive changes as a consequence of social movements.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2016
Articles|
December 01 2016
THE RISE OF INEQUALITY: HOW SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SHAPE DISCURSIVE FIELDS*
Sarah Gaby;
Please direct correspondence to Sarah Gaby at [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2016) 21 (4): 413–429.
Citation
Sarah Gaby, Neal Caren; THE RISE OF INEQUALITY: HOW SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SHAPE DISCURSIVE FIELDS. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 December 2016; 21 (4): 413–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-21-4-413
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
ASSEMBLING GOD’S “LAST BEST HOPE”: THE EXPANDING REACH OF THE WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES
Kristopher Velasco, Jeffrey Swindle
WHO’S THE REAL FEMINIST? FEMINIST DISCURSIVE BOUNDARY MAKING IN THE CONTEXT OF ANTI-GENDER CAMPAIGNS
Kerstin Jacobsson, Eva Karlberg, Elżbieta Korolczuk, Anna Meeuwisse