This article studies how the support workers expect from colleagues for strike participation affects their willingness to participate in a strike. We formulate hypotheses on the effects of anticipated social support for participation as well as anticipated social support for nonparticipation. We include the potentially mediating effect of social identification and the social costs of (non-)participation. We test our hypotheses on survey data of 725 Dutch employees collected in 2010. Using structural equation modeling techniques, we find that the support for participation has a stronger positive effect on the willingness to strike than the support for nonparticipation has on the willingness to strike. In addition, our findings suggest that union membership substitutes the effect of social support of colleagues.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2017
Articles|
September 01 2017
PEER SUPPORT IN INDUSTRIAL ACTION: HOW COLLEAGUES' ANTICIPATED SOCIAL SUPPORT AFFECTS WILLINGNESS TO STRIKE*
Agnes Akkerman
Agnes Akkerman
†
Direct all correspondence to a.akkerman@fm.ru.nl.
Search for other works by this author on:
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2017) 22 (3): 331–344.
Citation
Marieke J. Born, Agnes Akkerman; PEER SUPPORT IN INDUSTRIAL ACTION: HOW COLLEAGUES' ANTICIPATED SOCIAL SUPPORT AFFECTS WILLINGNESS TO STRIKE. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 September 2017; 22 (3): 331–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-23-3-331
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
38
Views
Citing articles via
CATALOGING PROTEST: NEWSPAPERS, NEXIS UNI, OR TWITTER?*
Lesley J. Wood, Dyllan Goldstein
BOOK REVIEWS
Elizabeth Borland