Whether in contemporary protests or in key movements in United States history, protesters must often contend with police and sometimes also with counterprotesters. Clashes with counterprotesters are often tense, ripe with the possibility of violence, and increase the chance of a police response. Although there is research on countermovements, there is little on counterprotesting. We conduct a systematic, cross-movement analysis to forward a strategic threatbased explanation of counterprotesting. We examine the frequency of counterdemonstration, the relative merits of threat versus weakness explanations of counterdemonstrator mobilization, and the relationship between counterdemonstrating and protest policing. We find that counterprotesting is relatively uncommon, is more common at conservative protests, and is explained by the threat posed by, and strength of, the initial movement. Furthermore, policing and counterdemonstrating appear positively and reciprocally related: we find that recent police repression increases counterdemonstration, and existing research shows that counterdemonstrators, in turn, increase police response.
CLASHES OF CONSCIENCE:EXPLAINING COUNTERDEMONSTRATION AT PROTESTS*
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Heidi Reynolds-Stenson, Jennifer Earl; CLASHES OF CONSCIENCE:EXPLAINING COUNTERDEMONSTRATION AT PROTESTS. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 September 2018; 23 (3): 263–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-23-3-263
Download citation file: