We introduce a set of concepts and general guidelines for what we call Contentious Episode Analysis (CEA). In the footsteps of Dynamics of Contention (DoC), we attempt to develop a conceptual framework that improves upon the concepts originally introduced by McAdam, Tarrow, and Tilly (2001). Our analytical strategy is similar to that of DoC in that we also propose to decompose the episodes into their component elements—actors, actions, sequences of actions, pairs of actions—that can then be recombined in a systematic way. We suggest that contentious episode analysis holds out the promise to go beyond the narrative approach by infusing it with the rigor and explicitness, while maintaining a dynamic quality. At the same time, CEA aims to move beyond a narrow focus on protest activities by challengers by incorporating into the analysis a broader set of action repertoires by a broader set of actors.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2019
Research Article|
September 01 2019
CONTENTIOUS EPISODE ANALYSIS*
Hanspeter Kriesi;
Please direct correspondence to Hanspeter Kriesi, Department of Social and Political Science, European University Institute, S. Domenico di Fiesole ([email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2019) 24 (3): 251–273.
Citation
Hanspeter Kriesi, Swen Hutter, Abel Bojar; CONTENTIOUS EPISODE ANALYSIS. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 September 2019; 24 (3): 251–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-24-3-251
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
PATRIARCHAL ERASURE AND MANUFACTURED PASSIVITY: ASYMMETRIC GOVERNMENT AND NEWS MEDIA ATTENTION TO PROTESTS IN CHINA
Linda Hong Cheng, Yao Lu, Han Zhang
BOOK REVIEWS
Kelsy Kretschmer