Scholars have long found profound normative and structural differences between the privacy movements of Europe and the United States, alongside incompatible regimes of regulation. After 9/11, both Europe and the U.S. adopted increasingly intrusive digital security measures, which impinged on the privacy of commercial and personal data. Both the overlap in privacy regimes and the securitization of the two regimes were uncovered by Edward Snowden’s revelations in 2013. The eventual result was the passage of a European privacy protection regulation, the General Data Protection Regulation, in 2016 and greater transnational diffusion and transnational cooperation among European and American privacy activists. But has this convergence produced a transnational movement for privacy? Studying three mechanisms of transnational mobilization—externalization, diffusion, and collective transnationalism—this article employs a political opportunity framework to understand how international events have increased the inclination and the capacity of nationally and regionally based privacy groups to come together in contentious collective action.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2020
Articles|
July 10 2020
THE RISE OF A TRANSNATIONAL MOVEMENT TO PROTECT PRIVACY*
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2020) 25 (2): 161–184.
Citation
Emilio Lehoucq, Sidney Tarrow; THE RISE OF A TRANSNATIONAL MOVEMENT TO PROTECT PRIVACY. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 June 2020; 25 (2): 161–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-25-2-161
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
PATRIARCHAL ERASURE AND MANUFACTURED PASSIVITY: ASYMMETRIC GOVERNMENT AND NEWS MEDIA ATTENTION TO PROTESTS IN CHINA
Linda Hong Cheng, Yao Lu, Han Zhang
BOOK REVIEWS
Kelsy Kretschmer