There is an ongoing debate in the sociology of collective action on the function of difference—often measured as group diversity—in mobilization. While some scholarship suggests that difference is often an impediment to collective action, other research finds that activisms attuned to difference can produce more flexible mobilization capable of tackling converging oppressions. To understand the meanings and negotiations of difference in collective action, this article examines how Latinx feminists do intersectionality in the movement for reproductive justice (RJ). Drawing on three years of ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews with a Latina/x reproductive justice organization in California, I argue that staff of the organization engage in contextual, relational, and cultural shift practices that together create a fluid sensibility, what I term “politicmaking,” focused on negotiating difference as a necessarily fraught and messy endeavor. The “politicmaking” of movement actors suggests the need to reexamine the role of difference in collective action.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2020
Articles|
December 22 2020
LATINX FEMINIST POLITICMAKING: ON THE NECESSITY OF MESSINESS IN COLLECTIVE ACTION*
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2020) 25 (4): 441–460.
Citation
Rocío R. García; LATINX FEMINIST POLITICMAKING: ON THE NECESSITY OF MESSINESS IN COLLECTIVE ACTION. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 December 2020; 25 (4): 441–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-25-4-441
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
PATRIARCHAL ERASURE AND MANUFACTURED PASSIVITY: ASYMMETRIC GOVERNMENT AND NEWS MEDIA ATTENTION TO PROTESTS IN CHINA
Linda Hong Cheng, Yao Lu, Han Zhang
BOOK REVIEWS
Kelsy Kretschmer