Emotions are essential for mobilization. In the face of violent repression, individual participants evaluate their relational positions in the interaction order within relation to other participants and compare their contributions. This evaluation leads to the arousal of emotions that help sustain mobilization. Using Hong Kong’s anti-extradition movement as a case and based on thirty-two in-depth interviews of participants, this article proposes two emotional mechanisms of sustained mobilization. Through the guilt mechanism, interviewees believed that some others were making more contributions, and felt sorry for failing to do more. Interviewees mobilized by the mechanism of moral pleasure and solidarity, on the other hand, argued that participants contributed equally. They took part in the movement out of the desire to fulfill their moral obligations, and they felt good to be part of the movement. The key factor distinguishing the mechanisms was how participants evaluated their positions and contributions compared to other participants.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2022
ARTICLES|
September 21 2022
VIOLENT REPRESSION, RELATIONAL POSITIONS, AND EMOTIONAL MECHANISMS IN HONG KONG’S ANTI-EXTRADITION MOVEMENT*
Chit Wai John Mok
† I thank Yang Su and his reading group, Francesca Polletta, Kennedy Chi-pan Wong, Samson Yuen, David Meyer, Mobilization editor Neal Caren, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and encouragement.
Please direct correspondence to cwmok@uci.edu.
Search for other works by this author on:
Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2022) 27 (3): 297–317.
Citation
Chit Wai John Mok; VIOLENT REPRESSION, RELATIONAL POSITIONS, AND EMOTIONAL MECHANISMS IN HONG KONG’S ANTI-EXTRADITION MOVEMENT. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 September 2022; 27 (3): 297–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-27-3-297
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
114
Views