As an applied anthropologist, I work on the twin tasks of impact assessment and conflict resolution as these are necessitated by proposals for major construction projects or natural resource development. I run a consulting firm which works with American Indian tribes, federal agencies, and corporations in the Pacific Northwest regarding the design, siting, or permitting of major and often controversial facilities or resource uses: hydroelectric projects, natural gas pipelines, timber sales, nuclear waste storage facilities, and the like. In conjunction with tribal colleagues, I participate in assessing the cultural implications of proposed environmental change. When a conflict exists between tribal cultural practices or values and a proposed project, as is common, we determine whether there are any changes in the design or siting of the project through which both the values of the tribe and the technical/economic requirements of the developer can be accommodated.
Skip Nav Destination
Native| February 17 2010
Conflicting Perceptions: Tribal and Regulatory Views of Nature, Risk, and Change
Cultural Solutions, P.O. Box 401, Ashland, OR 97520
Search for other works by this author on:
Practicing Anthropology (1994) 16 (3): 25–28.
Robert Winthrop; Conflicting Perceptions: Tribal and Regulatory Views of Nature, Risk, and Change. Practicing Anthropology 1 July 1994; 16 (3): 25–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/praa.16.3.221356051617g2r2
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign in via your Institution
The Problem with University Affiliation: Notes from an Independent Scholar
Emily C. Donaldson
Perks of Pivoting: Key Learnings from Data Collection Amid COVID-19 Regulations
Rachael Sorcher, Ami Dasig Salazar, Elvis Gatchalian, Juanjoe (Rhed) Gonzales, Elene Cloete
Are Tattoos Just a Muse?
Divyasree Sreedhar, Santosh Loganathan