Accidental exposures to ionizing radiation from external sources usually result in an inhomogeneous dose distribution rather than a homogeneous total-body irradiation (TBI). To study the hematological effects of an inhomogeneous dose distribution, dogs were unilaterally exposed to a beam of 300 kVp X rays (HVL = 3.8 mm Cu) with their left side directed to the source. The entrance and exit surface doses were 3.8 Gy and 0.9 Gy, respectively. Dose measurements performed in bone marrow spaces of various bones revealed a maximum of 3.1 Gy in the head of the left humerus and a minimum of 0.9 Gy in the right iliac crest. Based on survival for granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells (GM-CFC) determined in different bone marrow sites 24 h after the exposure, the dose-dependent reduction ranged from 0.44 to 16% of the control values. The regeneration of the GM-CFC compartments in the various bone marrow spaces showed patterns which were independent of each other up to Day 28. Values were normal again at Day 125 after exposure. For comparative purposes, three dogs were exposed bilaterally to achieve a homogeneous dose distribution. They received a TBI of 2.4 Gy, which according to previous calculations should have caused the same systemic damage to the GM-CFC compartment as the unilateral exposure. The peripheral blood cell changes, including the GM-CFC, and the colony stimulating activity in the serum showed a similar pattern for both exposures. These findings support the hypothesis that the overall survival fraction of progenitor cells in the bone marrow is the main determinant of the blood cell changes, independent of the anatomical distribution.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| July 01 1990
Hematological Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Exposures of Dogs to 300-kVp X Rays
Radiat Res (1990) 123 (1): 7–16.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Klaus Baltschukat, Wilhelm Nothdurft; Hematological Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Exposures of Dogs to 300-kVp X Rays. Radiat Res 1 July 1990; 123 (1): 7–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3577651
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Monte Carlo Simulation of SARS-CoV-2 Radiation-Induced Inactivation for Vaccine Development
Ziad Francis, Sebastien Incerti, Sara A. Zein, Nathanael Lampe, Carlos A. Guzman, Marco Durante
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
RITCARD: Radiation-Induced Tracks, Chromosome Aberrations, Repair and Damage
Ianik Plante, Artem Ponomarev, Zarana Patel, Tony Slaba, Megumi Hada