It has been clearly established that changes in intratumor$p{\rm O}_{2}$ and pH occur following hyperthermia, and it has been hypothesized that these changes may, in some way, be related to the ultimate response (i.e., cure) of the lesion. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to examine the changes in intratumor pH during the course of a hyperthermia treatment at biologically related end point "does"; second, to examine the response of$p{\rm O}_{2}$ after treatment in a different lesion transplant site. During hyperthermia treatment of the tumor transplanted in the leg, intratumor pH was found to drop from a control value of 6.74 ± 0.17 to 6.47 ± 0.13 within 15 min following the start of treatment. The values then remained relatively constant throughout the remainder of the treatment (either 1 or 2 h at 43.5°C). Following the subcurative (10% tumor cures at 30 days; 60 min at 43.5°C) treatment the pH began to rise immediately, while after the higher dose (60% tumor cures at 30 days; 120 min at 43.5°C) a slight rise in pH was followed by a continuous drop in pH for up to 4 h, as we have reported previously. Oxygen response in the two transplant sites (leg and flank) was found to be remarkably different even though the tumor cure rate was identical for a given hyperthermia "dose" in terms of time and temperature. In the leg, only very low levels of oxygen can be measured in the tumor 24 h after treatment with either "dose" studied (all measured$p{\rm O}_{2}$ values ≤5 mm Hg). In the flank, the tumor response is dependent on hyperthermia "dose." Only 28% of measured oxygen values are ≤5 mm Hg 24 h following a subcurative "dose," while 4 h following the higher "dose" there is a nonsignificant trend toward hypoxia (∼65% of values ≤5 mm Hg) with a subsequent shift toward reoxygenation. These latter observations are contrary to results reported previously and tend to contradict some current theories regarding the physiological mechanisms associated with hyperthermia treatment.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
August 1992
Research Article|
August 01 1992
Variations in$p{\rm O}_{2}$ and pH Response to Hyperthermia: Dependence on Transplant Site and Duration of Treatment
Radiat Res (1992) 131 (2): 152–156.
Citation
Fred W. Hetzel, Michael Chopp, Mary O. Dereski; Variations in$p{\rm O}_{2}$ and pH Response to Hyperthermia: Dependence on Transplant Site and Duration of Treatment. Radiat Res 1 August 1992; 131 (2): 152–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3578435
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner