A comparative study of the radiation and/or doxorubicin (DOX) survival response for synchronous populations of Chinese hamster V79 cells and two DOX-resistant variants (77A and LZ-8) was performed. The greatest cellular radiation sensitivity was observed in mitosis, while the greatest resistance was observed during late S phase for the three cell lines. The variation in radiation response throughout the cell cycle was expressed as a change in the width of the shoulder of the survival curves$(D_{q})$ with little change in D0. This suggests that each phase of the cell cycle has a different capacity for accumulation of radiation injury. The radiation age-response function for the three cell lines revealed that 77A and LZ-8 cells were more radiosensitive than V79 cells throughout the cell cycle. Exposure of synchronous populations to DOX (1.84 μM for V79, 9.21 μM for 77A, and 921 μM for LZ-8) for 1 h as a function of cell cycle phase revealed that V79, 77A, and LZ-8 cells exhibited the greatest sensitivity to DOX in mitosis and the most resistance to DOX during S phase, as indicated by the differences in the slope of the initial component of the survival curve. Levels of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) are probably not a factor contributing to DOX age-response function since P-gp levels remain constant throughout the cell cycle in all three cell lines. Synchronous populations of V79, 77A, and LZ-8 cells sequentially treated with DOX and radiation at various cell cycle phases were also analyzed. The results showed that the interaction between radiation and DOX damage resulted in a reduced cellular capacity for the accumulation of radiation damage throughout the cell cycle, as indicated by a decrease in the width of the shoulder of the survival curve. Overall, both DOX-sensitive V79 cells and DOX-resistant 77A and LZ-8 cells exhibited (1) a similar age-response function for radiation or DOX, and (2) no differences in the effects of DOX on radiation-induced damage throughout the cell cycle. These results indicate that acquired resistance to DOX associated with increased levels of P-gp in the cell membrane did not appear to affect the age-response function for radiation or DOX, and the nature of the interaction between damage caused by radiation and DOX was also not affected.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
October 1992
Research Article|
October 01 1992
Interaction between Radiation and Drug Damage in Mammalian Cells. VI. Radiation and Doxorubicin Age-Response Function of Doxorubicin-Sensitive and -Resistant Chinese Hamster Cells
Radiat Res (1992) 132 (1): 105–111.
Citation
Yin Zhang, Kevin M. Sweet, Marguerite A. Sognier, James A. Belli; Interaction between Radiation and Drug Damage in Mammalian Cells. VI. Radiation and Doxorubicin Age-Response Function of Doxorubicin-Sensitive and -Resistant Chinese Hamster Cells. Radiat Res 1 October 1992; 132 (1): 105–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3578340
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner