To use the micronucleus (MN) assay as a biological dosimeter, it is essential that the dose response to different radiation qualities is known. In this paper we present dose-response curves for MN induction by X rays (14, 50 and 350 kVp) and60 Co γ rays. The dose responses for 14 kVp compared to 50 kVp and for 350 kVp compared to60 Co were found to differ significantly, whereas no significant difference could be demonstrated between 50 kVp and 350 kVp. Calculated RBE values with respect to60 Co γ rays increase strongly with decreasing dose. The high RBE value (2.7) obtained for 14 kVp X rays in the low-dose region is of importance for radiological protection in clinical practice. A good linear correlation was found between the biological damage expressed by the RBE values for MN induction and the calculated physical parameter$\overline{{\rm LET}}_{100,{\rm T}}$ expressing the energy deposition pattern in the medium. This correlation points to the fact that secondary phenomena involved in MN formation (repair, coagulation) do not differ greatly for the X-ray qualities used in this work. It can be concluded that MN induction in human lymphocytes can be used as a sensitive biological dosimeter for radiation damage by X rays and γ rays.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
August 1994
Research Article|
August 01 1994
Sensitivity of Micronucleus Induction in Human Lymphocytes to Low-LET Radiation Qualities: RBE and Correlation of RBE and LET
Radiat Res (1994) 139 (2): 208–213.
Citation
F. Verhaegen, A. Vral; Sensitivity of Micronucleus Induction in Human Lymphocytes to Low-LET Radiation Qualities: RBE and Correlation of RBE and LET. Radiat Res 1 August 1994; 139 (2): 208–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3578666
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner