Buffer solutions used in experiments in radiation biology may be sterilized by either autoclaving or filtration. We show here that for phosphate-buffered saline such differences in buffer treatment may result in widely differing dose-effect curves for cell killing. The temperature-dependent transformation of monophosphate ions into di- or polyphosphate evidently proceeds to an appreciable extent upon autoclaving the buffers at 120°C for 10 to 20 min. This increases the capability of the buffer to chelate spurious metal contaminations and, as a consequence, to reduce the amount of cytotoxic hypochlorite being produced. Depending on conditions of buffer treatment we have observed dose modification factors for the colony-forming ability of yeast cells up to the order of 3. Thus effects due to buffer treatment might easily outweigh the effect which the experiment was originally designed to determine. We strongly advise, therefore, that results of parallel sets of experiments in which different methods of buffer sterilization have been used should not be compared directly.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
August 1996
Research Article|
August 01 1996
Radiation-Induced Cell Killing Is Highly Dependent upon Buffer Treatment (Filtration Compared to Autoclaving) Due to Metal-Catalyzed Formation of Hypochlorite: A Cautionary Note
Radiat Res (1996) 146 (2): 232–235.
Citation
Manfred Saran, Ulrike Hamm, Anna A. Friedl, Wolf Bors; Radiation-Induced Cell Killing Is Highly Dependent upon Buffer Treatment (Filtration Compared to Autoclaving) Due to Metal-Catalyzed Formation of Hypochlorite: A Cautionary Note. Radiat Res 1 August 1996; 146 (2): 232–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3579596
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner