Tumor reoxygenation after irradiation may contribute to a tumor's response to subsequent doses of radiation. The timing of reoxygenation in RIF-1 murine tumors was determined using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry with intratumoral implantation of an oxygen-sensitive paramagnetic material (India ink) to monitor the$p{\rm O}_{2}$ in individual murine tumors before, during and after three different irradiation schemes. Radiation was given as a single 20-Gy dose or was split into two 10-Gy doses where the second dose of radiation was delivered at the minimum postirradiation tumor$p{\rm O}_{2}$ (24-h interval, hypoxic group) or where the second dose of radiation was delivered after reoxygenation had occurred (72-h interval, oxygenated group). The end point for tumor response was time taken to reach double the volume at the time of treatment. There were significantly longer tumor doubling times in the oxygenated compared to the hypoxic group, indicating that the measured changes in$p{\rm O}_{2}$ reflected changes in tumor radiosensitivity. A 24-h interval between doses resulted in a delay of reoxygenation in the tumors, while a 72-h interval resulted in a second cycle of hypoxia/reoxygenation. Our results suggest that repeated direct measurements of$p{\rm O}_{2}$ in tumors by EPR oximetry could be useful in timing radiation doses to achieve improved local control of tumors.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
November 1998
Research Article|
November 01 1998
Effect on Regrowth Delay in a Murine Tumor of Scheduling Split-Dose Irradiation Based on Direct$p{\rm O}_{2}$ Measurements by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oximetry
Radiat Res (1998) 150 (5): 549–556.
Citation
Julia A. O'Hara, Fuminori Goda, Eugene Demidenko, Harold M. Swartz; Effect on Regrowth Delay in a Murine Tumor of Scheduling Split-Dose Irradiation Based on Direct$p{\rm O}_{2}$ Measurements by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oximetry. Radiat Res 1 November 1998; 150 (5): 549–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3579872
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr