Characteristic X rays of energies less than approximately 20 keV are of interest in radiobiology and radiation oncology. There is evidence that these low-energy photons produce higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and lower oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) relative to higher energies. Lower energy X rays also offer the advantage of healthy tissue sparing beyond the target treatment depth. Electronic brachytherapy systems that can deliver characteristic and bremsstrahlung X rays of varying energy are in clinical use as well as under development. We performed low-energy extrapolation ionization chamber dosimetry using two methods: 1. the exposure-to-dose method; and 2. the Burlin theory method combined with the extrapolation chamber method of Klevenhagen. We investigated fluorescent X rays emitted from seven metals: titanium (Ti, Z = 22); chromium (Cr, Z = 24); iron (Fe, Z = 26); cobalt (Co, Z = 27); copper (Cu, Z = 29); zinc (Zn, Z = 30); and molybdenum (Mo, Z = 42). X rays were produced by irradiation of the metals with a 55 kVp, 45 mA silver anode spectrum. The data obtained were air kerma rate (cGy/min), and radiation dose rate (cGy/min) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution and water. Air kerma rates ranged from 3.55 ± 0.10 to 14.36 ± 0.39 cGy/min. Dose rates ranged from 3.85 ± 0.10 to 16.96 ± 0.46 cGy/min in PBS and 3.59 ± 0.10 to 16.06 ± 0.43 cGy/min in water. Dose-rate energy dependence of both models was examined by taking a ratio of measured to Monte Carlo calculated dose rates. Dosimetry method 1 exhibited a linear relationship across all energies with a slope of 0.0127 keV−1 and R2 of 0.9276. Method 2 exhibited a linear relationship across all energies with a slope of 0.0467 keV−1 and R2 of 0.9933. Method 1 or 2 may be used as a relative dosimetry system to derive dose rates to water by using a second reference ion chamber with a NIST-traceable calibration for the molybdenum spectrum.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 September 2016
Research Article|
August 22 2016
Extrapolation Ionization Chamber Dosimetry of Fluorescent X-Ray Energies from 4.5 to 19.6 keV
Joseph T. Rakowski
;
Joseph T. Rakowski
1
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan;
1Address for correspondence: Wayne State University, Gershenson Radiation Oncology Center, 4100 John R Road, Mail Code GE00RO, Detroit, MI 48201-2013; e-mail: rakowski@karmanos.org.
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark A. Tucker
;
Mark A. Tucker
bDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Missouri Cancer Associates, Columbia, Missouri;
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael G. Snyder
;
Michael G. Snyder
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan;
Search for other works by this author on:
Simon P. Makar
;
Simon P. Makar
cDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Horizon Medical Services, Coral Springs, Florida; and
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Yudele
;
Mark Yudele
dDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McLaren-Macomb, Mt. Clemens, Michigan
Search for other works by this author on:
Jay Burmeister
;
Jay Burmeister
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan;
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael C. Joiner
Michael C. Joiner
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan;
Search for other works by this author on:
Radiat Res (2016) 186 (3): 283–291.
Citation
Joseph T. Rakowski, Mark A. Tucker, Michael G. Snyder, Simon P. Makar, Mark Yudele, Jay Burmeister, Michael C. Joiner; Extrapolation Ionization Chamber Dosimetry of Fluorescent X-Ray Energies from 4.5 to 19.6 keV. Radiat Res 1 September 2016; 186 (3): 283–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14384.1
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner