Health effects of in utero exposure to ionizing radiation, especially among adults, are still unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze cancer risk in a cohort of subjects exposed in utero due to releases of nuclear waste into the Techa River in the Southern Urals, taking into account additional postnatal exposure. Analysis for solid cancer was based on 242 cases among 10,482 cohort members, accumulating 381,948 person-years at risk, with follow-up from 1956–2009, while analysis for hematological malignancies was based on 26 cases among 11,070 persons, with 423,502 person-years at risk, with follow-up from 1953–2009. Mean doses accumulated in soft tissues and in red bone marrow during the prenatal period were 4 mGy and 30 mGy, respectively. Additional respective mean postnatal doses received by cohort members were 11 and 84 mGy. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the excess relative risk (ERR) of cancer incidence related to in utero and postnatal doses. No association was observed for in utero exposure with solid cancer risk [ERR per 10 mGy: −0.007; 95% confidence interval (CI): <−0.107; 0.148] or with hematological malignancy risk (ERR/10 mGy: −0.011; 95% CI: <–0.015; 0.099). However, ERR of solid cancer increased significantly with increasing postnatal dose (ERR/10 mGy: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04; 0.22). The very wide confidence intervals in these ERR results are similar to those of studies performed on the LSS cohort and the offspring of the Mayak Female Worker Cohort, as well as case-control studies of effects after in utero medical exposure. There were limitations of this study, with decreased statistical power, due to the low prenatal doses received by most of the cohort members, the small number of cancer cases and the absence of cohort members over the age of 59 years (living cohort members had reached 49–59 years of age). Further aging of the cohort and extension of the follow-up period will enhance the statistical power of this study in the future. There is a shortage of cohort studies reporting on the effects of prenatal radiation exposure, as well as information on chronic exposure during the prenatal period. Therefore, further research of this unique cohort will be a useful addition to the published literature on this subject, and a valuable means of elucidating the long-term effects of low-dose radiation exposure in the fetus.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2017
REGULAR ARTICLES|
July 17 2017
Cancer Incidence after In Utero Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Techa River Residents
L. Yu. Krestinina;
L. Yu. Krestinina
1
aUrals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
1Address for correspondence: Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, Vorovsky St. 68-a, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454076; email: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
Yu. E. Kharyuzov;
Yu. E. Kharyuzov
aUrals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Search for other works by this author on:
S. B. Epiphanova;
S. B. Epiphanova
aUrals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Search for other works by this author on:
E. I. Tolstykh;
E. I. Tolstykh
aUrals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Search for other works by this author on:
I. Deltour;
I. Deltour
bSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Schüz;
J. Schüz
bSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
Search for other works by this author on:
A. V. Akleyev
A. V. Akleyev
aUrals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Search for other works by this author on:
Radiat Res (2017) 188 (3): 314–324.
Article history
Received:
November 28 2016
Accepted:
May 16 2017
Citation
L. Yu. Krestinina, Yu. E. Kharyuzov, S. B. Epiphanova, E. I. Tolstykh, I. Deltour, J. Schüz, A. V. Akleyev; Cancer Incidence after In Utero Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Techa River Residents. Radiat Res 1 September 2017; 188 (3): 314–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14695.1
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Dosimetry: Was and Is an Absolute Requirement for Quality Radiation Research
Daniel Johnson, H. Harold Li, Bruce F. Kimler
Hepatic Stellate Cell-mediated Increase in CCL5 Chemokine Expression after X-ray Irradiation Determined In Vitro and In Vivo
Masataka Taga, Kengo Yoshida, Shiho Yano, Keiko Takahashi, Seishi Kyoizumi, Megumi Sasatani, Keiji Suzuki, Tomohiro Ogawa, Yoichiro Kusunoki, Tatsuaki Tsuruyama
Gastrointestinal Acute Radiation Syndrome: Mechanisms, Models, Markers, and Medical Countermeasures
Thomas A. Winters, Libero Marzella, Olivia Molinar-Inglis, Paul W. Price, Nyun Calvin Han, Jonathan E. Cohen, Sue-Jane Wang, Anthony F. Fotenos, Julie M. Sullivan, John I. Esker, Paula J. Lapinskas, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases
Kotaro Ozasa, Yukiko Shimizu, Akihiko Suyama, Fumiyoshi Kasagi, Midori Soda, Eric J. Grant, Ritsu Sakata, Hiromi Sugiyama, Kazunori Kodama
Brain Damage and Patterns of Neurovascular Disorder after Ionizing Irradiation. Complications in Radiotherapy and Radiation Combined Injury
Nikolai V. Gorbunov, Juliann G. Kiang