The acute lethality of total-body irradiation (TBI) involves damage to multiple organs, including bone marrow and intestine. Ionizing radiation mitigators that are effective when delivered 24 h or later after TBI include the anti-apoptotic drug, JP4-039 and the anti-necroptotic drug, necrostatin-1. In contrast to effective delivery of JP4-039 at 24 h after TBI, necrostatin-1 is most effective when delivery is delayed until 48 h, a time that correlates with the elevation of necroptosis-inducing inflammatory cytokines and necroptosis-induced serine phosphorylation of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase-3 (RIP3) in tissues. The goal of this work was to determine whether administration of JP4-039 influenced the optimal delivery time for necrostatin-1. We measured daily levels of 33 proteins in plasma compared to intestine and bone marrow of C57BL/6NTac female mice over a 7-day time period after 9.25 Gy TBI (LD50/30). Protein responses to TBI in plasma were different from those measured in intestine or bone marrow. In mice that were given JP4-039 at 24 h after TBI, we delayed necrostatin-1 delivery for 72 h after TBI based on measured delay in RIP-3 kinase elevation in marrow and intestine. Sequential delivery of these two radiation mitigator drugs significantly increased survival compared to single drug administration.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 January 2018
Research Article|
November 15 2017
Improved Total-Body Irradiation Survival by Delivery of Two Radiation Mitigators that Target Distinct Cell Death Pathways
Justin Steinman;
Justin Steinman
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Epperly;
Michael Epperly
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Wen Hou;
Wen Hou
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
John Willis;
John Willis
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Hong Wang;
Hong Wang
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Renee Fisher;
Renee Fisher
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Bing Liu;
Bing Liu
gComputational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Ivet Bahar;
Ivet Bahar
gComputational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Travis McCaw;
Travis McCaw
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Valerian Kagan;
Valerian Kagan
bDepartments of Environmental and Occupational Health
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Saiful Huq;
M. Saiful Huq
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Joel S. Greenberger
Joel S. Greenberger
1
aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
1Address for correspondence: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, POB 2, Rm. 533, 5150 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232; email: greenbergerjs@upmc.edu.
Search for other works by this author on:
Radiat Res (2018) 189 (1): 68–83.
Article history
Received:
March 15 2017
Accepted:
October 05 2017
Citation
Justin Steinman, Michael Epperly, Wen Hou, John Willis, Hong Wang, Renee Fisher, Bing Liu, Ivet Bahar, Travis McCaw, Valerian Kagan, Hulya Bayir, Jian Yu, Peter Wipf, Song Li, M. Saiful Huq, Joel S. Greenberger; Improved Total-Body Irradiation Survival by Delivery of Two Radiation Mitigators that Target Distinct Cell Death Pathways. Radiat Res 1 January 2018; 189 (1): 68–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14787.1
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Extended analysis of solid cancer incidence among the Nuclear Industry Workers in the UK: 1955–2011
Nezahat Hunter, Richard G.E. Haylock, Michael Gillies, Wei Zhang
Radiofrequency Fields and Calcium Movements Into and Out of Cells
Andrew Wood, Ken Karipidis
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner