There have been numerous published studies reporting on the extent of genetic damage observed in animal and human cells exposed in vitro and in vivo to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields (RF, electromagnetic waves that carry energy as they propagate in air and dense media). Overall, the data are inconsistent; while some studies have suggested significantly increased damage in cells exposed to RF energy compared to unexposed and/or sham-exposed control cells, others have not. Several variables in exposure conditions used in the experiments might have contributed to the controversy. In this comprehensive review, four specific quality control measures were used to determine the quality of 225 published studies in animal and human cells exposed in vitro and in vivo to RF energy, and the results from 2,160 tests with different sample sizes were analyzed. The four specific quality control measures were as follows: 1. “Blind” collection/analysis of the data to eliminate individual/observer “bias”; 2. Adequate description of “dosimetry” for independent replication/confirmation; 3. Inclusion of “positive controls” to confirm the outcomes; and 4. Inclusion of “sham-exposed controls” which are more appropriate to compare the data with those in RF exposure conditions. In addition, meta-analysis of the genetic damage in cells exposed to RF energy and control cells, thus far available in the RF literature database, was performed to obtain the “d” values, i.e., standardized mean difference between these two types of cells or the effect size. The relationship between d values and the above-mentioned quality control measures was ascertained. In addition, the correlation between the quality control measures and the conclusions reported in the publications (no significant difference between the cells exposed to RF energy and control cells; increased damage in former cells compared to the latter; increased, no significant difference and decreased damage in cells exposed to RF energy in the same experiment; or decreased damage in cells exposed to RF energy) was examined. The overall conclusions were as follows: 1. When all four quality control measures were mentioned in the publication, the d values were smaller compared to those when one or more quality control measures were not mentioned in the investigation; 2. Based on the inclusion of quality control measures, the weighted outcome in cells exposed to RF energy (d values) indicated a very small effect, if any; 3. The number of published studies reporting no significant difference in genetic damage of cells exposed to RF energy, compared to that of control cells, increased with increased number of quality control measures employed in investigations; 4. The number of published studies reporting increased genetic damage in cells exposed to RF energy decreased with increased number of quality control measures; and 5. There was a “bias” towards the publications reporting increased genetic damage in cells exposed to RF energy even with very small sample size. Overall, the results from this study underscore the importance of including quality control measures in investigations so that the resulting data are useful, nationally and internationally, in evaluating “potential” health risks from exposure to RF energy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 January 2019
REVIEWS|
October 19 2018
Comprehensive Review of Quality of Publications and Meta-analysis of Genetic Damage in Mammalian Cells Exposed to Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields
Vijayalaxmi;
Vijayalaxmi
1
Department ofaRadiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229
1Address for correspondence: Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229; email: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas J. Prihoda
Thomas J. Prihoda
bDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229
Search for other works by this author on:
Radiat Res (2019) 191 (1): 20–30.
Article history
Received:
April 22 2018
Accepted:
September 12 2018
Citation
Vijayalaxmi, Thomas J. Prihoda; Comprehensive Review of Quality of Publications and Meta-analysis of Genetic Damage in Mammalian Cells Exposed to Non-Ionizing Radiofrequency Fields. Radiat Res 1 January 2019; 191 (1): 20–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR15117.1
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Dosimetry: Was and Is an Absolute Requirement for Quality Radiation Research
Daniel Johnson, H. Harold Li, Bruce F. Kimler
Hepatic Stellate Cell-mediated Increase in CCL5 Chemokine Expression after X-ray Irradiation Determined In Vitro and In Vivo
Masataka Taga, Kengo Yoshida, Shiho Yano, Keiko Takahashi, Seishi Kyoizumi, Megumi Sasatani, Keiji Suzuki, Tomohiro Ogawa, Yoichiro Kusunoki, Tatsuaki Tsuruyama
Gastrointestinal Acute Radiation Syndrome: Mechanisms, Models, Markers, and Medical Countermeasures
Thomas A. Winters, Libero Marzella, Olivia Molinar-Inglis, Paul W. Price, Nyun Calvin Han, Jonathan E. Cohen, Sue-Jane Wang, Anthony F. Fotenos, Julie M. Sullivan, John I. Esker, Paula J. Lapinskas, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases
Kotaro Ozasa, Yukiko Shimizu, Akihiko Suyama, Fumiyoshi Kasagi, Midori Soda, Eric J. Grant, Ritsu Sakata, Hiromi Sugiyama, Kazunori Kodama
Brain Damage and Patterns of Neurovascular Disorder after Ionizing Irradiation. Complications in Radiotherapy and Radiation Combined Injury
Nikolai V. Gorbunov, Juliann G. Kiang