Radiation-induced cancer is an ongoing and significant problem, with sources that include clinics worldwide in which 3.1 billion radiology exams are performed each year, as well as a variety of other scenarios such as space travel and nuclear cleanup. These radiation exposures are typically anticipated, and the exposure is typically well below 1 Gy. When radiation-induced (actually ROS-induced) DNA mutation is prevented, then so too are downstream radiation-induced cancers. Currently, there is no protection available against the effects of such <1 Gy radiation exposures. In this study, we address whether the new PrC-210 ROS-scavenger is effective in protecting p53-deficient (p53–/–) mice against X-ray-induced accelerated tumor mortality; this is the most sensitive radiation tumorigenesis model currently known. Six-day-old p53–/– pups received a single intraperitoneal PrC-210 dose [0.5 maximum tolerated dose (MTD)] or vehicle, and 25 min later, pups received 4.0 Gy X-ray irradiation. At 5 min postirradiation, blood was collected to quantify white blood cell c-H2AX foci. Over the next 250 days, tumor-associated deaths were recorded. Findings revealed that when administered 25 min before 4 Gy X-ray irradiation, PrC-210 reduced DNA damage (c-H2AX foci) by 40%, and in a notable coincidence, caused a 40% shift in tumor latency/incidence, and the 0.5 MTD PrC210 dose had no discernible toxicities in these p53–/– mice. Essentially, the moles of PrC-210 thiol within a single 0.5 MTD PrC-210 dose suppressed the moles of ROS generated by 40% of the 4 Gy X-ray dose administered to p53–/– pups, and in doing so, eliminated the lifetime leukemia/lymphoma risk normally residing “downstream” of that 40% of the 4 Gy dose. In conclusion: 1. PrC-210 is readily tolerated by the 6-day-old p53–/– mice, with no discernible lifetime toxicities; 2. PrC-210 does not cause the nausea, emesis or hypotension that preclude clinical use of earlier aminothiols; and 3. PrC-210 significantly increased survival after 4 Gy irradiation in the p53–/– mouse model.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 January 2020
Research Article|
November 18 2019
Impact of the PrC-210 Radioprotector Molecule on Cancer Deaths in p53-Deficient Mice
William E. Fahl
;
William E. Fahl
1
a Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
1 Address for correspondence: Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705; email: fahl@oncology.wisc.edu.
Search for other works by this author on:
Frank Jermusek
;
Frank Jermusek
a Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas Guerin
;
Thomas Guerin
b Department of Medicine, Department of Oncology, UW Carbone Cancer Center
Search for other works by this author on:
Dawn M. Albrecht
;
Dawn M. Albrecht
b Department of Medicine, Department of Oncology, UW Carbone Cancer Center
Search for other works by this author on:
Carol J. Sarabia Fahl
;
Carol J. Sarabia Fahl
a Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
Search for other works by this author on:
Emma Dreischmeier
;
Emma Dreischmeier
a Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
Search for other works by this author on:
Chelsea Benedict
;
Chelsea Benedict
a Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan Back
;
Susan Back
a Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
Search for other works by this author on:
Jens Eickhoff
;
Jens Eickhoff
c Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard B. Halberg
Richard B. Halberg
b Department of Medicine, Department of Oncology, UW Carbone Cancer Center
Search for other works by this author on:
Radiat Res (2020) 193 (1): 88–94.
Article history
Received:
May 21 2019
Accepted:
October 21 2019
Citation
William E. Fahl, Frank Jermusek, Thomas Guerin, Dawn M. Albrecht, Carol J. Sarabia Fahl, Emma Dreischmeier, Chelsea Benedict, Susan Back, Jens Eickhoff, Richard B. Halberg; Impact of the PrC-210 Radioprotector Molecule on Cancer Deaths in p53-Deficient Mice. Radiat Res 1 January 2020; 193 (1): 88–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR15439.1
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
4
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner