DNA isolated from the bacteriophage ΦX174 was irradiated with γ-rays in a solution of pH 7.0 buffered with 0.01 M phosphate. At concentrations of a few milligrams per milliliter the yield of inactivation is 1.9 molecules of DNA per 100 eV of absorbed energy. The radio-sensitivity in oxygen and nitrogen does not differ significantly. Bubbling with nitrous oxide increases the yield by a factor of 2. These yields were derived from measurements of the 37% survival dose as a function of DNA concentration. Potassium iodide is strongly protective. Because potassium iodide scavenges OH radicals whereas nitrous oxide converts hydrated electrons into OH radicals, it is concluded that in concentrated DNA solutions at least 95% of the inactivations are due to primary attack by OH radicals, although reducing radicals are not completely inactive. At concentrations of a few micrograms per milliliter the yield of inactivation is lower by an order of magnitude and reducing radicals are relatively more important. From the protection afforded by free nucleotides it is concluded that OH radicals react about five times as fast with free nucleotides as with nucleotides in single-stranded DNA. In the presence of free pyrimidine nucleotides oxygen enhances the radiosensitivity considerably.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 June 1968
Research Article|
June 01 1968
The Attack of Free Radicals on Biologically Active DNA in Irradiated Aqueous Solutions
Radiat Res (1968) 34 (3): 689–703.
Citation
Joh. Blok, W. S. D. Verhey; The Attack of Free Radicals on Biologically Active DNA in Irradiated Aqueous Solutions. Radiat Res 1 June 1968; 34 (3): 689–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3572513
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Monte Carlo Simulation of SARS-CoV-2 Radiation-Induced Inactivation for Vaccine Development
Ziad Francis, Sebastien Incerti, Sara A. Zein, Nathanael Lampe, Carlos A. Guzman, Marco Durante
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
RITCARD: Radiation-Induced Tracks, Chromosome Aberrations, Repair and Damage
Ianik Plante, Artem Ponomarev, Zarana Patel, Tony Slaba, Megumi Hada