Effects of x-ray exposures of 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 512, and 1024 R on mitosis in hanging-drop preparations were determined by repeated observations of selected prophase cells before and at short intervals after irradiation. Prophase was subdivided into eight microscopically distinguishable stages: very-early, early, initial-middle, intermediate-middle, terminal-middle, initial-late, intermediate-late, and terminal-late. With one exception, cells treated at intermediate- or terminal-late prophase with any of the doses were neither delayed nor reverted. After 8 to 16 R nearly all cells from early to initial-late prophase are delayed in reaching prometaphase, but none reverts. After 32 to 64 R all cells in early to initial-late prophase are delayed and most revert; after 128 to 1024 R nearly all revert. Delay or reversion is preceded by a postirradiation inertia, during which the cell progresses mitotically at an almost normal rate for a short time. Duration of inertia is inversely related to dose. The degree of reversion depends on the exposure; at 128 R and greater, all cells that revert go back to early prophase. The relations of the G1, S, and G2 periods of the mammalian cell to the morphologically defined stages of the cell cycle of the acridian neuroblast are considered.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 January 1969
Research Article|
January 01 1969
A Detailed Analysis of X-Ray-Induced Prophase Delay and Reversion of Grasshopper Neuroblasts in Culture
Radiat Res (1969) 37 (1): 1–14.
Citation
J. Gordon Carlson; A Detailed Analysis of X-Ray-Induced Prophase Delay and Reversion of Grasshopper Neuroblasts in Culture. Radiat Res 1 January 1969; 37 (1): 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3572747
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner