Populations of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.), were exposed to a series of selected levels of x-rays (0 R, 1600 R, 3200 R, and 6400 R). Females mated with irradiated males produced a normal complement of eggs regardless of the dose administered to the males; however, the viability of the eggs decreased with increasing dose to the males. Nontreated females mated with irradiated males (6400 R) produced eggs that were only 0.0005% viable. Females treated with 3200 R and mated with nontreated males failed to produce eggs. Sterile individuals of either sex or both sexes were introduced into nontreated populations having a sex ratio of 1:1. The introduction of sterile males was more effective as a population control method when the percentagewise variation in egg viability was considered; however, the number of individuals produced was 11% less when sterile females were introduced than was found with the comparable introduction of sterile males. The more practical means of population control of Aedes aegypti was concluded to be the introduction of sterile males. Contrary to observations in many species, the females were twice as sensitive to radiation as were the males when compared on the basis of the dose required to sterilize and with regard to the production of viable eggs.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 March 1969
Research Article|
March 01 1969
Radiosensitivity and Regulation of Population Density in the Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti)
Radiat Res (1969) 37 (3): 493–498.
Citation
William K. Willard; Radiosensitivity and Regulation of Population Density in the Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti). Radiat Res 1 March 1969; 37 (3): 493–498. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3572689
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr