A calorimetric method for measuring the absorbed dose received by an aqueous solution from a 15-MeV linear accelarator, has been developed. A quartz conductivity cell with two parallel, circular platinum electrodes, filled with a 0.01 M phosphate buffer of pH 7, is placed coaxially behind a collimator confining a circular electron beam of about half the electrode diameter. When the cell receives a burst of electrons, the absorbed energy causes a temperature rise in the irradiated electrolyte which in turn results in an increase in electrical conductivity, corresponding to a temperature coefficient of about 2%/°C. The conductivity change is measured in a sensitive bridge circuit and recorded. Since, due to the short irradiation time of 2 seconds or less, the temperature rise is quasi-adiabatic, no thermal insulation is required. Doses as low as 1 krad can be measured with a standard deviation of 3%. Errors due to radiation chemical reactions could be excluded, but a correction for the energy absorption in the platinum was necessary. The conductimetric dosimeter agreed with the Fricke dosimeter within experimental random errors.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 December 1969
Research Article|
December 01 1969
Conductimetric Dosimetry: A Calorimetric Method for Measuring High-Intensity Pulsed Radiation
Radiat Res (1969) 40 (3): 473–483.
Citation
Klaus H. Schmidt, Warren L. Buck; Conductimetric Dosimetry: A Calorimetric Method for Measuring High-Intensity Pulsed Radiation. Radiat Res 1 December 1969; 40 (3): 473–483. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3573000
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner